Literature DB >> 22113619

18F-FDG PET/CT for detection and localization of residual or recurrent disease in patients with multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation.

Thorsten Derlin1, Christoph Weber, Christian R Habermann, Jochen Herrmann, Christian Wisotzki, Francis Ayuk, Christine Wolschke, Susanne Klutmann, Nicolaus Kröger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT for the detection and localization of residual or recurrent disease in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after stem cell transplantation.
METHODS: A total of 197 whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed in 99 patients with MM at different time points in the course of disease after autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Post-transplant PET/CT scans and clinical remission status as determined by the clinical gold standard (Uniform Response Criteria) were analysed and compared.
RESULTS: A total of 576 focal osseous and extramedullary lesions were detected in 79 scans. Additional diffuse bone marrow involvement was detected in 17 patients. (18)F-FDG PET/CT had a sensitivity of 54.6%, a specificity of 82.1%, a positive predictive value of 82.3%, a negative predictive value of 54.2% and an overall accuracy of 65.5%. The sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT was shown to depend on the disease category according to the Uniform Response Criteria for myeloma.
CONCLUSION: In patients with MM in the post-transplant setting, (18)F-FDG PET/CT may (1) contribute to the detection and localization of disease, (2) provide information about the extent of distinct myeloma manifestations and the total disease burden and (3) add information about the metabolic activity of disease, but (4) has substantially lower sensitivity for this purpose compared to the pretreatment setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22113619     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-011-1993-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  31 in total

1.  Value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography/computed tomography in predicting survival in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rauf Haznedar; Sahika Z Akı; Ozgür U Akdemir; Zübeyde N Ozkurt; Ozcan Ceneli; Münci Yağcı; Gulsan T Sucak; Mustafa Unlü
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Diagnostic utility of FDG PET in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma.

Authors:  Brian G M Durie; Alan D Waxman; Allesandro D'Agnolo; Cindy M Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Prognostic value of pretreatment serum beta 2 microglobulin in myeloma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  B G Durie; D Stock-Novack; S E Salmon; P Finley; J Beckord; J Crowley; C A Coltman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1990-02-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Myeloma bone disease.

Authors:  N S Callander; G D Roodman
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.851

6.  Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of bone involvement in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: preliminary results.

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Elena Zamagni; Mohsen Farsad; Paolo Castellucci; Patrizia Tosi; Delia Cangini; Eugenio Salizzoni; Romeo Canini; Michele Cavo; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Multiple myeloma treatment response assessment with whole-body dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Chieh Lin; Alain Luciani; Karim Belhadj; Jean-François Deux; Frédérique Kuhnowski; Mezri Maatouk; Pauline Beaussart; Charles A Cuenod; Corinne Haioun; Alain Rahmouni
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bhawna Sirohi; Ray Powles
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Early prediction of treatment response to high-dose salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed germ cell cancer using [(18)F]FDG PET.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; C Kollmannsberger; K Oechsle; B M Dohmen; A Pfannenberg; C D Claussen; R Bares; L Kanz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-02-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  25 in total

1.  Value of low-dose whole-body CT in the management of patients with multiple myeloma and precursor states.

Authors:  F Joseph Simeone; Joel P Harvey; Andrew J Yee; Elizabeth K O'Donnell; Noopur S Raje; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  (11)C-acetate as a new biomarker for PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma: initial staging and postinduction response assessment.

Authors:  Chieh Lin; Chi-Lai Ho; Shu-Hang Ng; Po-Nan Wang; Yenlin Huang; Yu-Chun Lin; Tzung-Chih Tang; Shu-Fan Tsai; Alain Rahmouni; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT for Detection of Metachronous Hodgkin's Disease in Patients with Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Till Sebastian Clauditz
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-11-14

Review 4.  Sequential whole-body PET/MR scanner: concept, clinical use, and optimisation after two years in the clinic. The manufacturer's perspective.

Authors:  Antonis Kalemis; Bénédicte M A Delattre; Susanne Heinzer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  Imaging of multiple myeloma: Current concepts.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Peter Bannas
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

6.  Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI before and early after treatment of multiple myeloma: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha; Maged Abdel Gelil Hamed; Rania Refaat; Mohamad Zakarya AlAzzazy; Manar A Bessar; Elshaimaa Mohamed Mohamed; Ayman F Ahmed; Heba Fathy Tantawy; Khaled Mohamed Altaher; Ahmed Ali Obaya; Amira Hamed Mohamed Afifi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Treatment response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT in multiple myeloma patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; J Hillengass; H Goldschmidt; B Wagner; U Haberkorn; K Kopka; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Comparative diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT versus whole-body MRI for determination of remission status in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Kersten Peldschus; Silvia Münster; Peter Bannas; Jochen Herrmann; Thomas Stübig; Christian R Habermann; Gerhard Adam; Nicolaus Kröger; Christoph Weber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Clinical value of ¹¹C-methionine PET/CT in patients with plasma cell malignancy: comparison with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Yuji Nakamoto; Kensuke Kurihara; Masatoshi Nishizawa; Kouhei Yamashita; Koya Nakatani; Tadakazu Kondo; Akifumi Takaori-Kondo; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  18F-fluorocholine versus 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for PET/CT imaging in patients with suspected relapsing or progressive multiple myeloma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Thibaut Cassou-Mounat; Sona Balogova; Valérie Nataf; Marie Calzada; Virginie Huchet; Khaldoun Kerrou; Jean-Yves Devaux; Mohamad Mohty; Jean-Noël Talbot; Laurent Garderet
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.