Literature DB >> 25035830

Imaging of multiple myeloma: Current concepts.

Thorsten Derlin1, Peter Bannas1.   

Abstract

Medical imaging is of crucial importance for diagnosis and initial staging as well as for differentiation of multiple myeloma (MM) from other monoclonal plasma cell diseases. Conventional radiography represents the reference standard for diagnosis of MM due to its wide availability and low costs despite its known limitations such as low sensitivity, limited specificity and its inability to detect extraosseous lesions. Besides conventional radiography, newer cross-sectional imaging modalities such as whole-body low-dose computed tomography (CT), whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT are available for the diagnosis of osseous and extraosseous manifestations of MM. Whole-body low-dose CT is used increasingly, replacing conventional radiography at selected centers, due to its higher sensitivity for the detection of osseous lesions and its ability to diagnose extraosseous lesions. The highest sensitivity for both detection of bone marrow disease and extraosseous lesions can be achieved with whole-body MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. According to current evidence, MRI is the most sensitive method for initial staging while (18)F-FDG PET/CT allows monitoring of treatment of MM. There is an evolving role for assessment of treatment response using newer MR imaging techniques. Future studies are needed to further define the exact role of the different imaging modalities for individual risk stratification and therapy monitoring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion-weighted imaging; Imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple myeloma; Plasmocytoma; Positron emission tomography-computed tomography; X-Ray

Year:  2014        PMID: 25035830      PMCID: PMC4095020          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  75 in total

1.  Lumbar bone marrow microcirculation measurements from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is a predictor of event-free survival in progressive multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jens Hillengass; Klaus Wasser; Stefan Delorme; Fabian Kiessling; Christian Zechmann; Axel Benner; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Anthony D Ho; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Thomas M Moehler
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  (11)C-acetate as a new biomarker for PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma: initial staging and postinduction response assessment.

Authors:  Chieh Lin; Chi-Lai Ho; Shu-Hang Ng; Po-Nan Wang; Yenlin Huang; Yu-Chun Lin; Tzung-Chih Tang; Shu-Fan Tsai; Alain Rahmouni; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  The value of FDG PET/CT in the initial staging and bone marrow involvement of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sait Sager; Nurhan Ergül; Hediye Ciftci; Güven Cetin; Sebnem Izmir Güner; Teyfik Fikret Cermik
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Advances in imaging and the management of myeloma bone disease.

Authors:  Evangelos Terpos; Lia A Moulopoulos; Meletios A Dimopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Whole-body low-dose multidetector row-CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: an alternative to conventional radiography.

Authors:  Marius Horger; Claus D Claussen; Ulrike Bross-Bach; Reinhard Vonthein; Tobias Trabold; Martin Heuschmid; Christina Pfannenberg
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of bone involvement in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: preliminary results.

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Elena Zamagni; Mohsen Farsad; Paolo Castellucci; Patrizia Tosi; Delia Cangini; Eugenio Salizzoni; Romeo Canini; Michele Cavo; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Current concepts in the evaluation of multiple myeloma with MR imaging and FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Christopher J Hanrahan; Carl R Christensen; Julia R Crim
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Sonja Buhmann; Christoph Becker; Stefan Oswald Schoenberg; Nicola Lang; Reiner Bartl; Maximilian Ferdinand Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.998

View more
  16 in total

1.  Imaginological characterization of multiple myeloma lesions of the jaws through cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Thaiza Gonçalves Rocha; Édila Figuerêdo Feitosa; Ângelo Maiolino; Roberto José Pessoa de Magalhães Filho; Fábio Ribeiro Guedes; Sandra Regina Torres; Maria Augusta Visconti
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 2.  The Critical Role of Imaging in the Management of Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Shahzad Raza; Siyang Leng; Suzanne Lentzsch
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Consensus on Surgical Management of Myeloma Bone Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 4.  FDG-PET imaging in hematological malignancies.

Authors:  L Valls; C Badve; S Avril; K Herrmann; P Faulhaber; J O'Donnell; N Avril
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 8.250

5.  Extramedullary Solitary Plasmacytoma: Demonstrating the Role of 18F-FDG PET Imaging.

Authors:  Archana Gautam; Kamal Kant Sahu; Ahsan Alamgir; Imran Siddiqi; Sikander Ailawadhi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-04-01

6.  Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; Jens Hillengass; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Jennifer Mosebach; Leyun Pan; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Uwe Haberkorn; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-12

Review 7.  MRI in multiple myeloma: a pictorial review of diagnostic and post-treatment findings.

Authors:  Julie C Dutoit; Koenraad L Verstraete
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-05-10

Review 8.  Towards Stratified Medicine in Plasma Cell Myeloma.

Authors:  Philip Egan; Stephen Drain; Caroline Conway; Anthony J Bjourson; H Denis Alexander
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Panoramic and skull imaging may aid in the identification of multiple myeloma lesions.

Authors:  K-M Faria; T-B Brandão; W-G Silva; J Pereira; F-S Neves; M-C Alves; W-H ShinLeataku; M-A Lopes; A-C-P Ribeiro; C-A Migliorati; A-R Santos-Silva
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-01-01

10.  11C-Methionine-PET: a novel and sensitive tool for monitoring of early response to treatment in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Katharina Lückerath; Constantin Lapa; Christa Albert; Ken Herrmann; Gerhard Jörg; Samuel Samnick; Herrmann Einsele; Stefan Knop; Andreas K Buck
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.