Literature DB >> 21287167

Value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography/computed tomography in predicting survival in multiple myeloma.

Rauf Haznedar1, Sahika Z Akı, Ozgür U Akdemir, Zübeyde N Ozkurt, Ozcan Ceneli, Münci Yağcı, Gulsan T Sucak, Mustafa Unlü.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the role of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) of bone marrow and the extramedullary lesion with the highest SUV(max) in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients in predicting overall survival (OS).
METHODS: A total of 61 newly diagnosed patients (55 MM and 6 plasmacytoma) were enrolled in the study [37 men and 24 women with a median age of 57 years (range 28-80 years)]. The SUV(max) of bone marrow and the extramedullary lesion in PET/CT was correlated with the levels of β(2)-microglobulin, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, creatinine, per cent of bone marrow plasma cells, serum free light chain (FLC) ratio, International Staging System (ISS) score and Durie-Salmon stage.
RESULTS: The extramedullary lesion with the highest SUV(max) showed significant correlation with bone marrow fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake (p = 0.027) and near significant correlation with ISS (p = 0.048). Bone marrow SUV(max) correlated significantly with the per cent of bone marrow plasma cell count (p = 0.024), CRP (p = 0.012) and ISS (p = 0.013). In stage III MM the mean values of SUV(max) in extramedullary lesions were significantly higher than stages I and II (6.23 ± 6.32 vs 2.85 ± 3.44, p = 0.023). The serum FLC ratio did not show any correlation with SUV(max) of lesions and bone marrow (p > 0.05). Forty-four MM patients with FDG-positive lesions in PET/CT showed inferior 5-year estimated survival (61.73%) when compared to 11 patients without FDG-positive lesions, all of whom were alive (p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis an extramedullary lesion with the highest SUV(max) was the only independent predictor of OS (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: PET/CT allows identification of high-risk myeloma patients, and extramedullary lesions with the highest SUV(max) independently predict inferior OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21287167     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-011-1738-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  25 in total

1.  Diagnostic utility of FDG PET in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma.

Authors:  Brian G M Durie; Alan D Waxman; Allesandro D'Agnolo; Cindy M Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of occult disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Kim Orchard; Sally Barrington; John Buscombe; Andrew Hilson; Hugh Grant Prentice; Atul Mehta
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  The prognostic value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose bone marrow uptake in patients with recent diagnosis of multiple myeloma: a comparative study with Tc-99m sestamibi.

Authors:  Massimo Castellani; Marco Carletto; Luca Baldini; Rossella Calori; Virgilio Longari; Davide Soligo; Luca Dellavedova; Paolo Gerundini
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.794

5.  Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of bone involvement in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: preliminary results.

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Elena Zamagni; Mohsen Farsad; Paolo Castellucci; Patrizia Tosi; Delia Cangini; Eugenio Salizzoni; Romeo Canini; Michele Cavo; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Cancer statistics, 1998.

Authors:  S H Landis; T Murray; S Bolden; P A Wingo
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Imaging in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Stefan Delorme; Andrea Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Prediction of progression-free survival in patients with multiple myeloma following anthracycline-based chemotherapy based on dynamic FDG-PET.

Authors:  Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; Martin Hoffmann; Raoul Bergner; Michael Uppenkamp; Uwe Haberkorn; Ludwig G Strauss
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.794

10.  Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.998

View more
  27 in total

1.  Whole-body MRI and PET/CT in multiple myeloma patients during staging and after treatment: personal experience in a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lucio Cascini; Carmela Falcone; Domenico Console; Antonino Restuccia; Marco Rossi; Antonello Parlati; Oscar Tamburrini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  (11)C-acetate as a new biomarker for PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma: initial staging and postinduction response assessment.

Authors:  Chieh Lin; Chi-Lai Ho; Shu-Hang Ng; Po-Nan Wang; Yenlin Huang; Yu-Chun Lin; Tzung-Chih Tang; Shu-Fan Tsai; Alain Rahmouni; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Quantitative dynamic 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography before autologous stem cell transplantation predicts survival in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; Maximilian Merz; Annette Kopp-Schneider; Anna Jauch; Marc-Steffen Raab; Sandra Sauer; Jens Hillengass; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Imaging of multiple myeloma: Current concepts.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Peter Bannas
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

5.  18F-FDG PET/CT for detection and localization of residual or recurrent disease in patients with multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Christoph Weber; Christian R Habermann; Jochen Herrmann; Christian Wisotzki; Francis Ayuk; Christine Wolschke; Susanne Klutmann; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Clinical relevance of PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Chaoyu Wang; Ling Wu; Chengtao Sun; Yizhuo Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2019-02-01

7.  Prognostic significance of normalized FDG-PET parameters in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing induction chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective single-center evaluation.

Authors:  Daria Ripani; Carmelo Caldarella; Tommaso Za; Daniele Antonio Pizzuto; Elena Rossi; Valerio De Stefano; Alessandro Giordano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Imaging in myeloma with focus on advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  Tara Barwick; Laure Bretsztajn; Kathryn Wallitt; Dimitri Amiras; Andrea Rockall; Christina Messiou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  FDG-PET imaging in hematological malignancies.

Authors:  L Valls; C Badve; S Avril; K Herrmann; P Faulhaber; J O'Donnell; N Avril
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 10.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT: a review of diagnostic and prognostic features in multiple myeloma and related disorders.

Authors:  Franco Dammacco; Giuseppe Rubini; Cristina Ferrari; Angelo Vacca; Vito Racanelli
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.