Literature DB >> 12483429

Diagnostic utility of FDG PET in multiple myeloma.

Hossein Jadvar1, Peter S Conti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Very little information is available regarding the diagnostic utility of positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG PET) in multiple myeloma. Our objective was to further define the role of FDG PET in the clinical assessment of patients with multiple myeloma. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Nine whole-body PET scans (45 min after intravenous administration of 370-555 MBq FDG) were performed in six patients (age 38-62 years, 5 males) with multiple myeloma for evaluation of the extent of disease at the time of initial diagnosis (n=3) and for assessment of therapy response (n=3). Three patients had PET scans both before and after therapy. Prior treatments included chemoradiation therapy (n=2) and chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation (n=1). Correlative imaging data were available in all patients and included skeletal radiographic survey (n=6), bone scan (n=3), and spinal CT or MRI (n=4), and were all obtained within 3 months of the PET study. Validation was by clinical or imaging follow-up.
RESULTS: In three patients with both pre- and post-therapy PET scans, PET demonstrated a favorable treatment response, by showing a decline in lesion metabolic activity (n=1), or progression of disease, by showing development of new lesions or higher lesion glucose metabolism (n=2), concordant with the clinical evaluation, while the other imaging studies showed no discernible interval changes. PET detected multiple hypermetabolic lesions in one patient with a negative bone scan and concordant positive skeletal radiographic survey. Bone scans underestimated the extent of disease in two other patients in comparison with PET. PET also detected a few early marrow lesions with subtle radiographic changes while all radiographically aggressive lytic lesions corresponded to intense hypermetabolism on PET.
CONCLUSION: PET can detect early marrow involvement of multiple myeloma and is useful in assessing the extent of active disease at the time of initial presentation and in evaluating treatment response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12483429     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-002-0580-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  23 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET to identify soft tissue disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sharon F Hain; Sobia Khan; William Stevenson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Comparison of imaging with FDG PET/CT with other imaging modalities in myeloma.

Authors:  Richard J Breyer; Michael E Mulligan; Stacy E Smith; Bruce R Line; Ashraf Z Badros
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography/computed tomography in predicting survival in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rauf Haznedar; Sahika Z Akı; Ozgür U Akdemir; Zübeyde N Ozkurt; Ozcan Ceneli; Münci Yağcı; Gulsan T Sucak; Mustafa Unlü
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  The value of FDG PET/CT in the initial staging and bone marrow involvement of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sait Sager; Nurhan Ergül; Hediye Ciftci; Güven Cetin; Sebnem Izmir Güner; Teyfik Fikret Cermik
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  PET/CT and MR imaging in myeloma.

Authors:  Michael E Mulligan; Ashraf Z Badros
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  PET/CT in primary musculoskeletal tumours: a step forward.

Authors:  A Lakkaraju; C N Patel; K M Bradley; A F Scarsbrook
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  18F-FDG PET/CT for detection and localization of residual or recurrent disease in patients with multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Christoph Weber; Christian R Habermann; Jochen Herrmann; Christian Wisotzki; Francis Ayuk; Christine Wolschke; Susanne Klutmann; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Current and future imaging modalities for multiple myeloma and its precursor states.

Authors:  Esther Tan; Brendan M Weiss; Esther Mena; Neha Korde; Peter L Choyke; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2011-06-08

Review 10.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.