William B Hanley1. 1. The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To review the status of universal newborn screening programs in Canada. METHODS: A brief questionnaire (seven questions) was circulated to one key individual in each province (n=10) and territory (n=3). These individuals were usually physicians or clinical biochemists closely involved in the diagnosis and treatment of genetic metabolic diseases. RESULTS: Universal newborn screening is under provincial jurisdiction. The number of diseases screened for varies and ranges from three to 28. Nine provinces/territories have a central computerized system for tracking initially positive cases. Only five provinces/territories have adequate personnel and resources for follow-up and treatment. Treatment costs are only partially covered in most jurisdictions. Only five provinces/territories have formal advisory committees with official mandates. Expensive, restricted access treatment products for adults with inherited metabolic diseases are only fully available in six provinces/territories. There is very limited access to these products in an additional four provinces/territories. To date, specific informed consent for newborn screening is not required in any province or territory. CONCLUSIONS: Canada is far behind the rest of the developed (and some 'emerging') countries of the world in the field of universal newborn screening. New strategies for advocating expanded screening, follow-up and (long-term) payment of treatment costs on behalf of the potentially affected infants and their families must be devised, and such initiatives should include participation from the new Public Health Agency of Canada.
OBJECTIVES: To review the status of universal newborn screening programs in Canada. METHODS: A brief questionnaire (seven questions) was circulated to one key individual in each province (n=10) and territory (n=3). These individuals were usually physicians or clinical biochemists closely involved in the diagnosis and treatment of genetic metabolic diseases. RESULTS: Universal newborn screening is under provincial jurisdiction. The number of diseases screened for varies and ranges from three to 28. Nine provinces/territories have a central computerized system for tracking initially positive cases. Only five provinces/territories have adequate personnel and resources for follow-up and treatment. Treatment costs are only partially covered in most jurisdictions. Only five provinces/territories have formal advisory committees with official mandates. Expensive, restricted access treatment products for adults with inherited metabolic diseases are only fully available in six provinces/territories. There is very limited access to these products in an additional four provinces/territories. To date, specific informed consent for newborn screening is not required in any province or territory. CONCLUSIONS: Canada is far behind the rest of the developed (and some 'emerging') countries of the world in the field of universal newborn screening. New strategies for advocating expanded screening, follow-up and (long-term) payment of treatment costs on behalf of the potentially affected infants and their families must be devised, and such initiatives should include participation from the new Public Health Agency of Canada.
Entities:
Keywords:
Congenital hypothyroidism; Hearing screening; Inherited metabolic disease; Newborn screening; Phenylketonuria; Tandem mass spectrometry
Authors: R J Pollitt; A Green; C J McCabe; A Booth; N J Cooper; J V Leonard; J Nicholl; P Nicholson; J R Tunaley; N K Virdi Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 1997 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: C A Seymour; M J Thomason; R A Chalmers; G M Addison; M D Bain; F Cockburn; P Littlejohns; J Lord; A H Wilcox Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 1997 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: T H Zytkovicz; E F Fitzgerald; D Marsden; C A Larson; V E Shih; D M Johnson; A W Strauss; A M Comeau; R B Eaton; G F Grady Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Anne Marie Comeau; Richard B Parad; Henry L Dorkin; Mark Dovey; Robert Gerstle; Kenan Haver; Allen Lapey; Brian P O'Sullivan; David A Waltz; Robert G Zwerdling; Roger B Eaton Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sandra A Banta-Wright; Nancy Press; Kathleen A Knafl; Robert D Steiner; Gail M Houck Journal: Breastfeed Med Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: J S Camelo; M I Machado Fernandes; L M Zanini Maciel; C A Scrideli; J L Ferreira Santos; A S Camargo; C Souza Passador; P Carvalho Leite; D Ruffato Resende; L Oliveira de Souza; R Giugliani; S Moysés Jorge Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2009-05-04 Impact factor: 4.982
Authors: S G Nicholls; L Tessier; H Etchegary; J C Brehaut; B K Potter; R Z Hayeems; P Chakraborty; J Marcadier; J Milburn; D Pullman; L Turner; B J Wilson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 2.692