Literature DB >> 22103996

Osteomark: a surgical navigation system for oral and maxillofacial surgery.

C Bouchard1, J C Magill, V Nikonovskiy, M Byl, B A Murphy, L B Kaban, M J Troulis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this project was to test a surgical navigation tool designed to help execute a surgical treatment plan. It consists of an electromagnetically tracked pencil that is used to mark bone intraoperatively. The device was tested on a precision block, an ex vivo pig mandible and during performance of six endoscopic vertical ramus osteotomies on pig cadavers. The difference between actual pencil position and that displayed by the computer was measured three times each at ten 2mm holes on the block (n=30 observations) and on the ex vivo mandible (n=11 measurements). Errors between planned and actual osteotomy locations for the cadaver procedures were measured. The mean distance between known and displayed locations was 1.55 ± 0.72 mm on the precision block and 2.10 ± 0.88 mm on the pig mandible. The error measured marking the same point on the block multiple (n=5) times was 0.58 ± 0.37 mm. The mean error on the simulated osteotomies was 2.35 ± 1.35 mm. Osteomark was simple to use and permitted localisation of holes and osteotomies with acceptable accuracy. In the future, the device and algorithms will be revised to further decrease error and the system will be tested on live animals.
Copyright © 2011 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22103996      PMCID: PMC3288652          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  17 in total

1.  Minimally invasive orthognathic surgery: endoscopic vertical ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  M J Troulis; O Nahlieli; F Castano; L B Kaban
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Computer-aided procedures in implantology, distraction and cranio-maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Rainer Schmelzeisen; Ralf Schön; Alexander Schramm; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg       Date:  2002-10

3.  Indications and limitations of intraoperative navigation in maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Max Heiland; Christian R Habermann; Rainer Schmelzle
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  General approach to first-order error prediction in rigid point registration.

Authors:  Andrei Danilchenko; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review.

Authors:  R Ewers; K Schicho; G Undt; F Wanschitz; M Truppe; R Seemann; A Wagner
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Comparison of two computer-assisted surgery techniques to guide a mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedure. Technical note.

Authors:  C d'Hauthuille; F Taha; B Devauchelle; S Testelin
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Stability of miniature electromagnetic tracking systems.

Authors:  Kurt Schicho; Michael Figl; Markus Donat; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Rudolf Seemann; Arne Wagner; Helmar Bergmann; Rolf Ewers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  A computer-assisted approach to planning multidimensional distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Krishna C Yeshwant; Edward B Seldin; Ron Kikinis; Leonard B Kaban
Journal:  Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2005-03

9.  Intraoperative navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  S Hassfeld; J Mühling; J Zöller
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Interventional sialoendoscopy: early clinical results.

Authors:  Maria E Papadaki; Joseph P McCain; King Kim; Ronald L Katz; Leonard B Kaban; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  5 in total

1.  Assessment of the OsteoMark-Navigation System for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Zachary S Peacock; John C Magill; Brad J Tricomi; Brian A Murphy; Vladimir Nikonovskiy; Nobuhiko Hata; Laurent Chauvin; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  [Application of mixed reality technique for the surgery of oral and maxillofacial tumors].

Authors:  Z N Tang; Y Hui; L H Hu; Y Yu; W B Zhang; X Peng
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-12-18

3.  Electromagnetic surgical navigation in patients undergoing mandibular surgery.

Authors:  S G Brouwer de Koning; F Geldof; R L P van Veen; M J A van Alphen; L H E Karssemakers; J Nijkamp; W H Schreuder; T J M Ruers; M B Karakullukcu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Vision-based markerless registration using stereo vision and an augmented reality surgical navigation system: a pilot study.

Authors:  Hideyuki Suenaga; Huy Hoang Tran; Hongen Liao; Ken Masamune; Takeyoshi Dohi; Kazuto Hoshi; Tsuyoshi Takato
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Comparing Accuracy of Implant Installation with a Navigation System (NS), a Laboratory Guide (LG), NS with LG, and Freehand Drilling.

Authors:  Ting-Mao Sun; Huey-Er Lee; Ting-Hsun Lan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.