Literature DB >> 33331325

[Application of mixed reality technique for the surgery of oral and maxillofacial tumors].

Z N Tang, Y Hui, L H Hu, Y Yu, W B Zhang, X Peng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application of mixed reality technique for the surgery of oral and maxillofacial tumors.
METHODS: In this study, patients with a diagnosis of an oral and maxillofacial tumor who were referred to Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from December 2018 to January 2020 were selected. The preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography data of the patients were imported into StarAtlas Holographic Medical Imaging System (Visual 3D Corp., Beijing, China). Three-dimensional (3D) model of tumor and key structures, such as skeleton and vessels were reconstructed to three-dimensionally present the spatial relationship between them, followed with the key structures delineation and preoperative virtual surgical planning. By using mixed reality technique, the real-time 3D model was displayed stereotactically in the surgical site. While keeping sterile during operation, the surgeon could use simple gestures to adjust the 3D model, and observed the location, range, and size of tumor and the key structures adjacent to the tumor. Mixed reality technique was used to assist the operation: 3D model registration was performed for guidance before tumor excision; intraoperative real-time verification was performed during tumor exposure and after excision of the tumor. The Likert scale was used to evaluate the application of mixed reality technique after the operation.
RESULTS: Eight patients underwent mixed reality assisted tumor resection, and all of them successfully completed the operation. The average time of the 3D model registration was 12.0 minutes. In all the cases, the surgeon could intuitively and three-dimensionally observe the 3D model of the tumor and the surrounding anatomical structures, and could adjust the model during the operation. The results of the Likert scale showed that mixed reality technique got high scores in terms of perceptual accuracy, helping to locate the anatomical parts, the role of model guidance during surgery, and the potential for improving surgical safety (4.22, 4.19, 4.16, and 4.28 points respectively). Eight patients healed well without perioperative complications.
CONCLUSION: By providing real-time stereotactic visualization of anatomy of surgical site and guiding the operation process through 3D model, mixed reality technique could improve the accuracy and safety of the excision of oral and maxillofacial tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D reconstruction; Mixed reality(MR); Oral and maxillofacial tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33331325      PMCID: PMC7745289     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  17 in total

1.  Navigation-guided fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction: A proof of concept study.

Authors:  Piotr Pietruski; Marcin Majak; Ewelina Światek-Najwer; Magdalena Żuk; Michał Popek; Maciej Mazurek; Marta Świecka; Janusz Jaworowski
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Augmented and virtual reality in surgery-the digital surgical environment: applications, limitations and legal pitfalls.

Authors:  Wee Sim Khor; Benjamin Baker; Kavit Amin; Adrian Chan; Ketan Patel; Jason Wong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

3.  Effective Application of Mixed Reality Device HoloLens: Simple Manual Alignment of Surgical Field and Holograms.

Authors:  Daisuke Mitsuno; Koichi Ueda; Yuka Hirota; Mariko Ogino
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Outcomes of Orbital Floor Reconstruction After Extensive Maxillectomy Using the Computer-Assisted Fabricated Individual Titanium Mesh Technique.

Authors:  Wen-Bo Zhang; Chi Mao; Xiao-Jing Liu; Chuan-Bin Guo; Guang-Yan Yu; Xin Peng
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Mixed Reality with HoloLens: Where Virtual Reality Meets Augmented Reality in the Operating Room.

Authors:  Oren M Tepper; Hayeem L Rudy; Aaron Lefkowitz; Katie A Weimer; Shelby M Marks; Carrie S Stern; Evan S Garfein
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Osteomark: a surgical navigation system for oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  C Bouchard; J C Magill; V Nikonovskiy; M Byl; B A Murphy; L B Kaban; M J Troulis
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  [Application of three-dimensional reconstruction of the enhanced CT with iPlan CMF software in head and neck neoplasms].

Authors:  Y Yu; W B Zhang; Y Wang; X J Liu; C B Guo; G Y Yu; X Peng
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2017-10-18

8.  Clinical Feasibility of a Wearable Mixed-Reality Device in Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Fatih Incekara; Marion Smits; Clemens Dirven; Arnaud Vincent
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  A first attempt of inferior vena cava filter successfully guided by a mixed-reality system: a case report.

Authors:  Hang Zhu; Yao Li; Chi Wang; Qiu-Yang Li; Zheng-Yang Xu; Xin Li; Abudureyimu Abudulitipujiang; Ji-Xing Pan; Er-Long Fan; Jun Guo; Yun-Dai Chen
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  Surgery guided by mixed reality: presentation of a proof of concept.

Authors:  Thomas M Gregory; Jules Gregory; John Sledge; Romain Allard; Olivier Mir
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and Application of Digital Maxillofacial Surgery System Based on Mixed Reality Technology.

Authors:  Rong Yang; Chenyao Li; Puxun Tu; Abdelrehem Ahmed; Tong Ji; Xiaojun Chen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.