Literature DB >> 15617960

Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review.

R Ewers1, K Schicho, G Undt, F Wanschitz, M Truppe, R Seemann, A Wagner.   

Abstract

Computer-aided surgical navigation technology is commonly used in craniomaxillofacial surgery. It offers substantial improvement regarding esthetic and functional aspects in a range of surgical procedures. Based on augmented reality principles, where the real operative site is merged with computer generated graphic information, computer-aided navigation systems were employed, among other procedures, in dental implantology, arthroscopy of the temporomandibular joint, osteotomies, distraction osteogenesis, image guided biopsies and removals of foreign bodies. The decision to perform a procedure with or without computer-aided intraoperative navigation depends on the expected benefit to the procedure as well as on the technical expenditure necessary to achieve that goal. This paper comprises the experience gained in 12 years of research, development and routine clinical application. One hundred and fifty-eight operations with successful application of surgical navigation technology--divided into five groups--are evaluated regarding the criteria "medical benefit" and "technical expenditure" necessary to perform these procedures. Our results indicate that the medical benefit is likely to outweight the expenditure of technology with few exceptions (calvaria transplant, resection of the temporal bone, reconstruction of the orbital floor). Especially in dental implantology, specialized software reduces time and additional costs necessary to plan and perform procedures with computer-aided surgical navigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15617960     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  30 in total

Review 1.  Zygomatic implants: a critical review of the surgical techniques.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Alexsander Ribeiro Pedrosa; Antônio Luís Neto Custódio
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-01-25

2.  Marker-free registration for the accurate integration of CT images and the subject's anatomy during navigation surgery of the maxillary sinus.

Authors:  S-H Kang; M-K Kim; J-H Kim; H-K Park; W Park
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Comparison of cone-beam and conventional multislice computed tomography for image-guided dental implant planning.

Authors:  Paul W Poeschl; Nina Schmidt; Godoberto Guevara-Rojas; Rudolf Seemann; Rolf Ewers; Harald T Zipko; Kurt Schicho
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Oral Implant Imaging: A Review.

Authors:  Sarika Gupta; Neelkant Patil; Jitender Solanki; Ravinder Singh; Sanjeev Laller
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015 May-Jun

5.  Bone treatment laser-navigated surgery.

Authors:  Bettina Hohlweg-Majert; Herbert Deppe; Marc C Metzger; Sebstian Stopp; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Tim C Lueth
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Accuracy assessment for the co-registration between optical and VIVE head-mounted display tracking.

Authors:  Leah A Groves; Patrick Carnahan; Daniel R Allen; Rankin Adam; Terry M Peters; Elvis C S Chen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Warning navigation system using real-time safe region monitoring for otologic surgery.

Authors:  Byunghyun Cho; Masamichi Oka; Nozomu Matsumoto; Riichi Ouchida; Jaesung Hong; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Osteomark: a surgical navigation system for oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  C Bouchard; J C Magill; V Nikonovskiy; M Byl; B A Murphy; L B Kaban; M J Troulis
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  [Computer-assisted orbital floor reconstruction. Use of a CAD/CAM implant with intraoperative contact-free 3D endo- and exophthalmometry].

Authors:  T V Kühnel; E Vairaktaris; C Alexiou; K A Schlegel; F W Neukam; E Nkenke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  [Enophthalmos correction in complex orbital floor reconstruction : computer-assisted, intraoperative, non-contact, optical 3D support].

Authors:  T V Kühnel; E Vairaktaris; K A Schlegel; F W Neukam; B Kühnel; L M Holbach; E Nkenke
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.