Literature DB >> 33633247

Electromagnetic surgical navigation in patients undergoing mandibular surgery.

S G Brouwer de Koning1, F Geldof2, R L P van Veen3,4, M J A van Alphen3,4, L H E Karssemakers3,4, J Nijkamp2, W H Schreuder3,4, T J M Ruers2,5, M B Karakullukcu3,4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of electromagnetic (EM) navigation for guidance on osteotomies in patients undergoing oncologic mandibular surgery. Preoperatively, a 3D rendered model of the mandible was constructed from diagnostic computed tomography (CT) images. Cutting guides and patient specific reconstruction plates were designed and printed for intraoperative use. Intraoperative patient registration was performed using a cone beam CT scan (CBCT). The location of the mandible was tracked with an EM sensor fixated to the mandible. The real-time location of both the mandible and a pointer were displayed on the navigation system. Accuracy measurements were performed by pinpointing four anatomical landmarks and four landmarks on the cutting guide using the pointer on the patient and comparing these locations to the corresponding locations on the CBCT. Differences between actual and virtual locations were expressed as target registration error (TRE). The procedure was performed in eleven patients. TREs were 3.2 ± 1.1 mm and 2.6 ± 1.5 mm using anatomical landmarks and landmarks on the cutting guide, respectively. The navigation procedure added on average half an hour to the duration of the surgery. This is the first study that reports on the accuracy of EM navigation in patients undergoing mandibular surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633247      PMCID: PMC7907338          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84129-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  16 in total

1.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Evaluation of 3 different registration techniques in image-guided bimaxillary surgery.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Heinz-Theo Luebbers; Jimoh Olubanwo Agbaje; Serge Schepers; Luc Vrielinck; Ivo Lambrichts; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  A surgical navigated cutting guide for mandibular osteotomies: accuracy and reproducibility of an image-guided mandibular osteotomy.

Authors:  Timon Peter Ter Braak; Susan Gijsbertje Brouwer de Koning; Maarten Jan Antony van Alphen; Ferdinand van der Heijden; Willem Hans Schreuder; Robert Leonardus Petrus van Veen; Munir Baris Karakullukcu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Real-time augmented model guidance for mandibular proximal segment repositioning in orthognathic surgery, using electromagnetic tracking.

Authors:  Sang-Jeong Lee; Hoon Joo Yang; Min-Hyuk Choi; Sang-Yoon Woo; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Sam-Sun Lee; Min-Suk Heo; Soon-Chul Choi; Soon Jung Hwang; Won-Jin Yi
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Intraoperative cone-beam CT-guided osteotomy navigation in mandible and maxilla surgery.

Authors:  Wael Hasan; Michael J Daly; Harley H L Chan; Jimmy Qiu; Jonathan C Irish
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Prospective study on image-guided navigation surgery for pelvic malignancies.

Authors:  Jasper Nijkamp; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Oleksandra Ivashchenko; Bas Pouw; Nikie Hoetjes; Melanie A Lindenberg; Arend G J Aalbers; Geerard L Beets; Frits van Coevorden; Niels KoK; Theo J M Ruers
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Utilization of a 3D printed dental splint for registration during electromagnetically navigated mandibular surgery.

Authors:  S G Brouwer de Koning; J J M Riksen; T P Ter Braak; M J A van Alphen; F van der Heijden; W H Schreuder; L H E Karssemakers; M B Karakullukcu; R L P van Veen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Electromagnetic navigated condylar positioning after high oblique sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: a guided method to attain pristine temporomandibular joint conditions.

Authors:  Moritz Berger; Igor Nova; Sebastian Kallus; Oliver Ristow; Urs Eisenmann; Hartmut Dickhaus; Michael Engel; Christian Freudlsperger; Jürgen Hoffmann; Robin Seeberger
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2017-12-29

9.  Osteomark: a surgical navigation system for oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  C Bouchard; J C Magill; V Nikonovskiy; M Byl; B A Murphy; L B Kaban; M J Troulis
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: evaluation of mandible registration accuracy and report of the first clinical cases of navigated sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  H Naujokat; M Rohnen; J Lichtenstein; F Birkenfeld; M Gerle; C Flörke; J Wiltfang
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 2.789

View more
  1 in total

1.  A hybrid registration method using the mandibular bone surface for electromagnetic navigation in mandibular surgery.

Authors:  A F de Geer; M J A van Alphen; C L Zuur; A J Loeve; R L P van Veen; M B Karakullukcu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.924

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.