Literature DB >> 7699162

Interference in detection of interaural delay in a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone produced by a second, spectrally remote sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone.

L M Heller1, C Trahiotis.   

Abstract

Sensitivity to interaural time delays (ITDs) within high-frequency sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) target tones was measured in the presence of a second, spectrally remote diotic SAM tone (termed an interferer). Targets and interferers were 100% modulated at 250 Hz and each was presented at 77 dB SPL for a duration of 250 ms. The modulations of targets and interferers were either in-phase or out-of-phase. In the first experiment, when the target SAM tone was centered at 4 kHz, interferers were centered at either 500 Hz, 1 kHz, or 2 kHz. Threshold ITDs were substantially increased in the presence of the interferers as compared to when the targets were presented in isolation. The greatest effects were observed with interferers centered at 500 Hz and 1 kHz. In the second experiment, when the target SAM tone was centered at 2 kHz, interferers were centered at either 500 Hz or 4 kHz. Threshold ITDs increased in the presence of either interferer, but the greatest increase occurred in the presence of the 500-Hz SAM tone. In the third experiment, it was found that presenting the low-frequency SAM tones continuously resulted in less interference than did presenting the interferers and targets coincidently. In all three experiments, the effects produced by the interferers did not depend upon whether they were modulated in-phase or out-of-phase with the target. Taken together, the data argue against the notion that the interference could result from a peripheral, monaural interaction between target and interferer waveforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7699162     DOI: 10.1121/1.413096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Interaural spectral asymmetry and sensitivity to interaural time differences.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Laurie M Heller; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Binaural interference in the free field.

Authors:  Naomi B H Croghan; D Wesley Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Reconsidering evidence for the suppression model of the octave illusion.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Jason B Mattingley; Simon A Moss
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

5.  Measures of extents of laterality for high-frequency "transposed" stimuli under conditions of binaural interference.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Binaural interference with simulated electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Chantal van Ginkel; René H Gifford; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spectrotemporal weighting of binaural cues: Effects of a diotic interferer on discrimination of dynamic interaural differences.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Bibee; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spectral weighting functions for lateralization and localization of complex sound.

Authors:  Monica L Folkerts; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  A dominance hierarchy of auditory spatial cues in barn owls.

Authors:  Ilana B Witten; Phyllis F Knudsen; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.

Authors:  René H Gifford; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.208

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.