Literature DB >> 19647242

Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence.

Bret J Spier1, Mark Benson, Patrick R Pfau, Gregory Nelligan, Michael R Lucey, Eric A Gaumnitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although 140 colonoscopies is the recommended minimal requirement for gastroenterology fellows, it is unclear whether this minimum is a surrogate for competence.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether 140 colonoscopies is an adequate threshold to determine > or =90% colonoscopy performance independence.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis on a database constructed for quality control/improvement.
SETTING: Gastroenterology fellowship training program at a veterans hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy primarily for symptoms, previous polyps, or family history of cancer (a minority were performed for screening only) from April 2007 to September 2008. This study involved 11 gastroenterology fellows who performed 770 colonoscopies during 18 individual month-long rotations. INTERVENTION: Assessment of various procedure-related parameters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Determining when > or =90% independence in colonoscopy performance was reached.
RESULTS: Total colonoscopy time, time to cecal intubation, withdrawal time, and independent completion rates all significantly improved when first and third years of training were compared (P < .001 for all comparisons). The adenoma detection rate did not change between years of training. Independent completion was achieved in > or =90% of cases for all fellows after 500 colonoscopies, whereas no fellow reached a > or =90% independent colonoscopy completion rate after 140 colonoscopies. LIMITATIONS: Number of participants, single center.
CONCLUSIONS: Becoming a competent colonoscopist requires repeated practice. Our study suggests that, although there is variability between a trainee's ability to become colonoscopy independent, 500 colonoscopies are likely required to ensure reliable (> or =90%) independent completion rates. Competency requires more than a single parameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19647242     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  47 in total

1.  Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with an increase in adenoma detection rate - review of data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water-related methods.

Authors:  Fw Leung; Jo Harker; Jw Leung; Rm Siao-Salera; Sk Mann; Fc Ramirez; S Friedland; A Amato; F Radaelli; S Paggi; V Terruzzi; Yh Hsieh
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  Trainees' adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥ 10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Mark A Gromski; Christopher A Miller; Suck-Ho Lee; Eun Seo Park; Tae Hoon Lee; Sang-Heum Park; Il-Kwun Chung; Sun-Joo Kim; Young Hwangbo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy.

Authors:  David Armstrong; Alan Barkun; Ron Bridges; Rose Carter; Chris de Gara; Catherine Dube; Robert Enns; Roger Hollingworth; Donald Macintosh; Mark Borgaonkar; Sylviane Forget; Grigorios Leontiadis; Jonathan Meddings; Peter Cotton; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Endoscopy services and training: a national survey of general surgeons.

Authors:  Daniel Skubleny; Noah Switzer; Shahzeer Karmali; Christopher de Gara
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Achieving competence in colonoscopy: Milestones and the need for a new endoscopic curriculum in gastroenterology training.

Authors:  Sara B Stanford; Stephanie Lee; Candace Masaquel; Robert H Lee
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10

6.  Simulated Colonoscopy Objective Performance Evaluation (SCOPE): a non-computer-based tool for assessment of endoscopic skills.

Authors:  E M Ritter; T C Cox; K D Trinca; J P Pearl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Isn't it time to stop talking about colonoscopy quality and start doing something about it?

Authors:  Swati G Patel; Dennis J Ahnen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Endoscopy in Canada: Proceedings of the National Roundtable.

Authors:  Noah Switzer; Elijah Dixon; Jill Tinmouth; Nori Bradley; Melina Vassiliou; Steve Schwaitzberg; Tony Gomes; James Ellsmere; Chris de Gara
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-17

9.  Double-Balloon Colonoscopy Has a Higher Cecal Intubation Rate Than Conventional Colonoscopy Using a Colon Simulator.

Authors:  Keijiro Sunada; Satoshi Shinozaki; Tomonori Yano; Yoshikazu Hayashi; Hirotsugu Sakamoto; Alan Kawarai Lefor; Hironori Yamamoto
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Development and initial validation of an endoscopic part-task training box.

Authors:  Christopher C Thompson; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Nitin Kumar; Amy Ou; Andrew Camacho; Balazs Lengyel; Michele B Ryan
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 10.093

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.