Literature DB >> 11437045

The impact of endoscopists' experience and learning curves and interendoscopist variation on colonoscopy completion rates.

G Dafnis1, F Granath, L Påhlman, H Hannuksela, A Ekbom, P Blomqvist.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Since its introduction in the late 1960s, the technology of colonoscopy has developed rapidly and the competence of endoscopists has increased. Nevertheless, it is not always possible to perform a complete colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to assess, in a population-based setting, the endoscopist-related factors influencing the completion rate, taking into account patient characteristics and changes in the technology over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All colonoscopy records between 1979 and 1995 in one Swedish county (population 258,000) were retrieved. Information was obtained about patient demographics, date of examination, endoscopist, indications, presence of diverticulosis, type of colonoscopy, findings, level of completion, complications, and reasons for incomplete colonoscopy. Completion rates were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Of 5,494 colonoscopies, 4,153 (75%) were complete, and 78% were diagnostic and 22% therapeutic. In 70 %, findings were pathological, and 30 % were normal. The overall 30-day endoscopist-related complication rate was 0.3 %. Over time, the proportion of colonoscopies performed by endoscopists with greater experience increased and so did the completion rates. Completion rates were influenced by endoscopist's experience and to some extent by the intensity (the number of colonoscopies performed by the endoscopist during the previous 90 days). There was a large interendoscopist variation, at each level of experience, in the ability to perform a complete colonoscopy, implying substantial differences between individual learning curves.
CONCLUSIONS: The completion rate has increased over time, the major reason being greater competence of endoscopists. The finding of large interendoscopist variation, at each level of experience, in the ability to perform a complete colonoscopy supports the monitoring of endoscopists to maintain and improve performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11437045     DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-14964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  15 in total

1.  Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ball; Jane Osbourne; Sarah Jowett; Mike Pellen; Mark R Welfare
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-18

Review 2.  Management of colorectal cancers.

Authors:  R Lewis; A Flynn; M E Dean; A Melville; A Eastwood; A Booth
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

3.  Trainees' adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥ 10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Mark A Gromski; Christopher A Miller; Suck-Ho Lee; Eun Seo Park; Tae Hoon Lee; Sang-Heum Park; Il-Kwun Chung; Sun-Joo Kim; Young Hwangbo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Assessing colonoscopy training outcomes using quality indicators.

Authors:  Leigh D Eckert; Matthew W Short; Jason E Domagalski; Khalid A Jaboori; Patricia A Short
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-09

5.  Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity.

Authors:  W M Ajaj; T C Lauenstein; G Pelster; G Gerken; S G Ruehm; J F Debatin; S C Goehde
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Does use of a colonoscopy imaging device improve performance? A cohort study.

Authors:  James J Wood; Christopher J W Foy; Roland Valori; Michelle E Lucarotti; Aidan L Fowler; Kevin Dowler; Timothy A Cook
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Assessment of competence in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Catharine M Walsh
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-08

8.  Double-balloon endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of GI tract diseases: Methodology, indications, safety, and clinical impact.

Authors:  Kazuya Akahoshi; Masaru Kubokawa; Masahiro Matsumoto; Shingo Endo; Yasuaki Motomura; Jiro Ouchi; Mitsuhide Kimura; Atsuhiko Murata; Michiaki Murayama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Colonoscopy at a combined district general hospital and specialist endoscopy unit: lessons from 505 consecutive examinations.

Authors:  Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Catherine Thapar; Syed G Shah; Brian P Saunders
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Predictive factors affecting cecal intubation failure in colonoscopy trainees.

Authors:  Hong-Jun Park; Jin-Heon Hong; Hyun-Soo Kim; Bo-Ra Kim; So-Yeon Park; Ki-Won Jo; Jae-Woo Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.