Literature DB >> 22080165

Prognostic factors of visual field improvement after trans-sphenoidal approach for pituitary macroadenomas: review of the literature and analysis by quantitative method.

Lina Raffaella Barzaghi1, Marzia Medone, Marco Losa, Stefania Bianchi, Massimo Giovanelli, Pietro Mortini.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the preoperative visual field defect, the postoperative outcome and the possible prognostic factors in patients with pituitary macroadenoma, using a quantitative method (the mean deviation = MD), and to review the literature. A total of 73 patients, operated trough trans-sphenoidal approach, were selected, and data in single eyes were analysed by calculating the frequency and the degree of postoperative improvement (relative improvement). The visual field defect improved in 95.7% of eyes: The recovery was complete in 48.9% and partial in 46.8%. Multivariate logistic regression showed that factors, independently predictive for complete recovery, were as follows: low preoperative MD absolute value (p = 0.008), low cranio-caudal diameter of tumour (p = 0.02) and young age (p = 0.0001). The mean relative improvement in visual field defect (dMD%) was correlated with the preoperative visual acuity (p = 0.0001) and inversely related with the preoperative MD (p = 0.007) and the age (p = 0.017). The relative improvement was higher in tumours with a smaller cranio-caudal diameter (p = 0.0185). In conclusion, using a quantitative method, we can measure the degree of the postoperative visual field defect improvement. Predictive factors for a complete recovery were good preoperative visual function, young age and low cranio-caudal tumour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22080165     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-011-0365-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  22 in total

1.  Predictive factors for the development of visual loss in patients with pituitary macroadenomas and for visual recovery after optic pathway decompression.

Authors:  Mário L R Monteiro; Beatriz K Zambon; Leonardo P Cunha
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.882

2.  The time course of visual field recovery following transphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: predictive factors for a good outcome.

Authors:  K K Gnanalingham; S Bhattacharjee; R Pennington; J Ng; N Mendoza
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests.

Authors:  J Katz; A Sommer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-09

4.  Visual status after transsphenoidal surgery at the Mayo Clinic, 1971-1982.

Authors:  J C Trautmann; E R Laws
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Stages of improvement in visual fields after pituitary tumor resection.

Authors:  J B Kerrison; M J Lynn; C A Baer; S A Newman; V Biousse; N J Newman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Recovery of vision following treatment of pituitary tumours; application of a new system of assessment to patients treated by transsphenoidal operation.

Authors:  G Findlay; R M McFadzean; G Teasdale
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Transsphenoidal microsurgery of pituitary macroadenomas with long-term follow-up results.

Authors:  I Ciric; M Mikhael; T Stafford; L Lawson; R Garces
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Visual outcome after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  M Peter; N De Tribolet
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.596

9.  Evaluation of the transcranial approach to pituitary adenomas based on quantitative analysis of pre- and postoperative visual function.

Authors:  K Suzukawa
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Visual outcomes of pituitary adenoma surgery. St. Vincent's Hospital 1968-1987.

Authors:  L J Sullivan; J O'Day; P McNeill
Journal:  J Clin Neuroophthalmol       Date:  1991-12
View more
  20 in total

1.  Predictive factors of visual function recovery after pituitary adenoma resection: a literature review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min Sun; Zhi-Qiang Zhang; Chi-Yuan Ma; Sui-Hua Chen; Xin-Jian Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging as predictor of functional outcome in craniopharyngiomas.

Authors:  Pietro Mortini; Filippo Gagliardi; Michele Bailo; Alfio Spina; Andrea Parlangeli; Andrea Falini; Marco Losa
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Visual Outcomes after Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery in Patients Presenting with Preoperative Visual Deficits.

Authors:  Felipe Fredes; Gabriel Undurraga; Pablo Rojas; Felipe Constanzo; Carolina Lazcano; Jaime Pinto; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-07-19

4.  Resection of tumors of the third ventricle involving the hypothalamus: effects on body mass index using a dedicated surgical approach.

Authors:  Pietro Mortini; Filippo Gagliardi; Michele Bailo; Nicola Boari; Antonella Castellano; Andrea Falini; Marco Losa
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Surgical indications for pituitary tumors during pregnancy: a literature review.

Authors:  Thomas Graillon; Thomas Cuny; Frédéric Castinetti; Blandine Courbière; Marie Cousin; Frédérique Albarel; Isabelle Morange; Nicolas Bruder; Thierry Brue; Henry Dufour
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Pituitary adenomas in elderly patients: clinical and surgical outcome analysis in a large series.

Authors:  Alfio Spina; Marco Losa; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Factors influencing improvement of visual field after trans-sphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenomas: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fen-Fen Yu; Li-Li Chen; Yi-Hua Su; Li-Hun Huo; Xian-Xuan Lin; Rui-Duan Liao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Microsurgical therapy of pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Pietro Mortini; Lina Raffaella Barzaghi; Luigi Albano; Pietro Panni; Marco Losa
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Retinal nerve fiber layer changes after transsphenoidal and transcranial pituitary adenoma resection.

Authors:  Nidan Qiao; Zhao Ye; Ming Shen; Xuefei Shou; Yongfei Wang; Shiqi Li; Min Wang; Yao Zhao
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 10.  Visual outcomes after endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivo S Muskens; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Vanessa Briceno; Nayan Lamba; Joeky T Senders; Wouter R van Furth; Marco J T Verstegen; Timothy R S Smith; Rania A Mekary; Christine A E Eenhorst; Marike L D Broekman
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.