Literature DB >> 29181320

Predictive factors of visual function recovery after pituitary adenoma resection: a literature review and Meta-analysis.

Min Sun1,2, Zhi-Qiang Zhang3, Chi-Yuan Ma4, Sui-Hua Chen5, Xin-Jian Chen1.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the dominant predictive factors of postoperative visual recovery for patients with pituitary adenoma.
METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant human studies, which investigated the prediction of the postoperative visual recovery of patients with pituitary adenoma, from January 2000 to May 2017. Meta-analyses were performed on the primary outcomes. After the related data were extracted by two independent investigators, pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effects or a fixed-effects model.
RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included in the literature review, and nine trials were included in the Meta-analysis, which comprised 530 patients (975 eyes) with pituitary adenoma. For the primary outcomes, there was a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative mean deviation (MD) values of the visual field (WMD -5.85; 95%CI: -8.19 to -3.51; P<0.00001). Predictive characteristics of four factors were revealed in this Meta-analysis by assigning the patients to sufficient and insufficient groups according to postoperative visual field improvements, including preoperative visual field defect (WMD 10.09; 95%CI: 6.17 to 14.02; P<0.00001), patient age (WMD -12.32; 95%CI: -18.42 to -6.22; P<0.0001), symptom duration (WMD -5.04; 95%CI: -9.71 to -0.37; P=0.03), and preoperative peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness (OR 0.1; 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.23; P<0.00001).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative visual field defect, symptom duration, patient age, and preoperative pRNFL thickness are the dominant predictive factors of the postoperative recovery of the visual field for patients with pituitary adenoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pituitary adenoma; retinal thickness; visual field defect; visual function recovery prediction

Year:  2017        PMID: 29181320      PMCID: PMC5686375          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.11.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  40 in total

1.  Retinal thickness decreases with age: an OCT study.

Authors:  B Alamouti; J Funk
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using 3D fourier-domain OCT.

Authors:  Marcel N Menke; Pascal Knecht; Veit Sturm; Simeon Dabov; Jens Funk
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Reversible dysfunction of retinal ganglion cells in non-secreting pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Lori M Ventura; Frank X Venzara; Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Visual acuity and pattern of visual field loss at presentation in pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Siddharth Ogra; Andrew D Nichols; Stanley Stylli; Andrew H Kaye; Peter J Savino; Helen V Danesh-Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  The time course of visual field recovery following transphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: predictive factors for a good outcome.

Authors:  K K Gnanalingham; S Bhattacharjee; R Pennington; J Ng; N Mendoza
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Diagnostic ability of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements and neurologic hemifield test to detect chiasmal compression.

Authors:  Chan Hee Moon; Si Hyung Lee; Bum-Tae Kim; Sun Chul Hwang; Young-Hoon Ohn; Tae Kwann Park
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Factors associated with delay to pituitary adenoma diagnosis in patients with visual loss.

Authors:  Arman Jahangiri; Kathleen R Lamborn; Lewis Blevins; Sandeep Kunwar; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Prognostic factors of visual field improvement after trans-sphenoidal approach for pituitary macroadenomas: review of the literature and analysis by quantitative method.

Authors:  Lina Raffaella Barzaghi; Marzia Medone; Marco Losa; Stefania Bianchi; Massimo Giovanelli; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Stages of improvement in visual fields after pituitary tumor resection.

Authors:  J B Kerrison; M J Lynn; C A Baer; S A Newman; V Biousse; N J Newman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Predicting visual outcome after treatment of pituitary adenomas with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Maud Jacob; Gérald Raverot; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Gilles Perrin; Muriel Rabilloud; Caroline Tilikete; Martine Bernard; Alain Vighetto
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  8 in total

1.  Relationship between postoperative volume of macroadenomas and clinical outcome after endoscopic trans-sphenoidal resection.

Authors:  Valeria Onofrj; Carina Vallejo; Paulo Puac; Carlos Zamora; Mauricio Castillo
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2018-08-09

Review 2.  Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Sinonasal, Nasopharyngeal, and Anterior Skull Base Tumors.

Authors:  Yelda Jozaghi; Jack Phan; Ehab Y Hanna; Michael E Kupferman; Shirley Y Su
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Predictive value of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in visual field defect of pituitary adenoma patients: a case-control study.

Authors:  Li Xia; Jia Wenhui; Yang Xiaowen; Xie Wenfang; Zhang Wei; Hu Yanjun; Peng Xiaoyan
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Quantitative Analysis of Macular Retina Using Light Reflection Indices Derived from SD-OCT for Pituitary Adenoma.

Authors:  Min Sun; Hongming Zhang; Xinjian Chen; Qimi Zhang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Predictive value of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness for postoperative visual improvement in patients with pituitary macroadenoma.

Authors:  Deepthi Elizabeth Kurian; Rajshekhar V; Saban Horo; Ari G Chacko; Krishna Prabhu; Gowri Mahasampath; Sanita Korah
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07

6.  Retinal ganglion cell analysis in patients with sellar and suprasellar tumors with sagittal bending of the optic nerve.

Authors:  Yoichiro Shinohara; Daisuke Todokoro; Rei Yamaguchi; Masahiko Tosaka; Yuhei Yoshimoto; Hideo Akiyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  A Factorial Analysis on Visual Outcomes of Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Macroadenoma.

Authors:  Ben Chat Fong Ng; Calvin Hoi-Kwan Mak; Chong Shing Yee Steffi; See Ka Wing; Tse Tat Shing; Cheung Fung Ching
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2022-08-24

8.  Quality of care evaluation in non-functioning pituitary adenoma with chiasm compression: visual outcomes and timing of intervention clinical recommendations based on a systematic literature review and cohort study.

Authors:  Iris C M Pelsma; Marco J T Verstegen; Friso de Vries; Irene C Notting; Marike L D Broekman; Wouter R van Furth; Nienke R Biermasz; Alberto M Pereira
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.107

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.