Literature DB >> 11124302

Stages of improvement in visual fields after pituitary tumor resection.

J B Kerrison1, M J Lynn, C A Baer, S A Newman, V Biousse, N J Newman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use static threshold perimetry to examine the stages of improvement and the potential for late improvement of visual fields after surgical resection of pituitary adenomas causing visual loss from compression of the anterior visual pathways.
METHODS: Retrospective review of charts of patients with pituitary tumors and abnormal static threshold perimetry before or soon after treatment who had subsequent visual fields. Quantification of the visual field mean deviation overall, superotemporally, and inferotemporally was performed and compared between visits. Postoperative visits were considered in five time periods: visit 1 (surgery to 1 week), visit 2 (1 month to 4 months), visit 3 (6 months to 1 year), visit 4 (2 years), and visit 5 (3 or more years).
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included (33 men and 29 women; mean age 54 years [SD +/- 15 years; range, 22 to 83 years]). At visit 1, the relative improvement of the overall mean deviation for the right eye was 30.8% (P =.01) and for the left eye was 13.7% (P =.3067). At visit 2, the relative improvement of the overall mean deviation for the right eye was 30. 4% (P =.0142) and for the left eye was 32.6% (P =.0092). At visits 1 and 2, the inferotemporal quadrants were the quadrants with greatest improvement (visit 1, right eye, 37.8% [P =.0082]; visit 2, left eye, 30.8% [P =.0074]). At visits 3, 4, and 5, an overall trend toward mild improvement was observed with statistical significance only for the inferotemporal quadrant of the left eye from visit 2 to visit 3, which improved 19.7% (P =.0270).
CONCLUSION: The pattern of recovery of visual function after decompression of the anterior visual pathways suggests at least three phases of improvement. The early fast phase (surgery to 1 week) of improvement may lead to normalization of visual fields in some individuals. The early slow phase (1 month to 4 months) is the period of most notable improvement. A late phase (6 months to 3 years) of mild improvement does not appear significant overall but may be marked in some individuals. Each of these phases may have one or more mechanisms underlying the observed improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11124302     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00539-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  27 in total

1.  Predictive factors of visual function recovery after pituitary adenoma resection: a literature review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min Sun; Zhi-Qiang Zhang; Chi-Yuan Ma; Sui-Hua Chen; Xin-Jian Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Pituitary apoplexy.

Authors:  Wenya Linda Bi; Ian F Dunn; Edward R Laws
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Segmented retinal layer analysis of chiasmal compressive optic neuropathy in pituitary adenoma patients.

Authors:  Ji-Sun Moon; Sun Young Shin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Visual Outcomes after Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery in Patients Presenting with Preoperative Visual Deficits.

Authors:  Felipe Fredes; Gabriel Undurraga; Pablo Rojas; Felipe Constanzo; Carolina Lazcano; Jaime Pinto; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-07-19

5.  Physiological Correlates and Predictors of Functional Recovery After Chiasmal Decompression.

Authors:  Noa Raz; Atira S Bick; Alexander Klistorner; Sergey Spektor; Daniel S Reich; Tamir Ben-Hur; Netta Levin
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Clinical characteristics and ophthalmologic findings of pituitary adenoma in Korean patients.

Authors:  Tae Gi Kim; Kyung Hyun Jin; Jaheon Kang
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Predictive model for recovery of visual field after surgery of pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Junwon Lee; Seung Woo Kim; Dong Wook Kim; Joo Youn Shin; Moonjung Choi; Min Chul Oh; Seung Min Kim; Eui Hyun Kim; Sun Ho Kim; Suk Ho Byeon
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Visual field loss and risk of fractures in older women.

Authors:  Anne L Coleman; Steven R Cummings; Kristine E Ensrud; Fei Yu; Peter Gutierrez; Katie L Stone; Jane A Cauley; Kathryn L Pedula; Marc C Hochberg; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Endoscopic Endo-nasal Trans-Sphenoidal Approach for Pituitary Adenomas: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  R G Aiyer; Garima Upreti
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.