Literature DB >> 26682178

Factors influencing improvement of visual field after trans-sphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenomas: a retrospective cohort study.

Fen-Fen Yu1, Li-Li Chen2, Yi-Hua Su1, Li-Hun Huo1, Xian-Xuan Lin1, Rui-Duan Liao1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the influencing factors of visual field improvement after trans-sphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenomas.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 201 patients (366 eyes) with visual field defect induced by pituitary macroadenomas. All of them were treated with trans-sphenoidal surgery. Ophthalmologic evaluation, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and visual field examination were performed before and 3mo after surgery. BCVA, visual field defect index mean deviation (MD), duration of symptoms, age, sex, and volume of tumors were compared. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Ki-67 of tumor tissue were detected by immunohistochemical technique.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 44.23±1.29y. Ninety-three patients were female and 108 were male. The mean tumor volume was 14.36±6.23 cm(3). The mean duration of preoperative symptoms was 11.50±0.88mo. Mean preoperative MD was -17.50±0.82 dB. Mean Preoperative visual acuity was 0.64±0.04. Postoperative visual field improved in 270 (73.77%) eyes, unchanged in 96 (26.23%) eyes. Multivariate logistic regression displayed that the factors independently influencing visual field improvement were young age (OR=1.71, 95%CI: 1.325-2.387, P=0.013), low preoperative MD absolute value (OR=1.277, 95%CI: 1.205-1.355, P<0.001), small volume of tumor (OR=1.458, 95%CI: 1.060-4.289, P<0.001), low expression of VEGF in tumor tissue (OR=1.554, 95%CI: 1.089-2.457, P=0.022), and low expression of Ki-67 in tumor tissue (OR=1.552, 95%CI: 1.161-2.847, P=0.026).
CONCLUSION: After pituitary macroadenomas trans-sphenoidal resection, the independent influencing factors of the visual fields recovery were low preoperative MD absolute value, young age, small volume of tumor, and expression levels of VEGF/ Ki-67.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ki-67; influencing factors; pituitary adenoma; vascular endothelial growth factor; visual field

Year:  2015        PMID: 26682178      PMCID: PMC4651894          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.06.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  25 in total

1.  The expression of interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-17 receptor and MMP-9 in human pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Lubin Qiu; Dongsheng He; Xiang Fan; Zhi Li; Chuangxin Liao; Yonghong Zhu; Haijun Wang
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  The time course of visual field recovery following transphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: predictive factors for a good outcome.

Authors:  K K Gnanalingham; S Bhattacharjee; R Pennington; J Ng; N Mendoza
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Proliferative activity and invasiveness among pituitary adenomas and carcinomas: an analysis using the MIB-1 antibody.

Authors:  K Thapar; K Kovacs; B W Scheithauer; L Stefaneanu; E Horvath; P J Pernicone; D Murray; E R Laws
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Prognostic factors of visual field improvement after trans-sphenoidal approach for pituitary macroadenomas: review of the literature and analysis by quantitative method.

Authors:  Lina Raffaella Barzaghi; Marzia Medone; Marco Losa; Stefania Bianchi; Massimo Giovanelli; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Pituitary volume and headache: size is not everything.

Authors:  Miles J Levy; H Rolf Jäger; Michael Powell; Manjit S Matharu; Karim Meeran; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2004-05

6.  Complications of transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pituitary adenoma: experience at a single centre.

Authors:  L R Barzaghi; M Losa; M Giovanelli; P Mortini
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  K Maeda; Y S Chung; Y Ogawa; S Takatsuka; S M Kang; M Ogawa; T Sawada; M Sowa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Predicting visual outcome after treatment of pituitary adenomas with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Maud Jacob; Gérald Raverot; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Gilles Perrin; Muriel Rabilloud; Caroline Tilikete; Martine Bernard; Alain Vighetto
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Association of vascular endothelial growth factor expression with intratumoral microvessel density and tumour cell proliferation in human epidermoid lung carcinoma.

Authors:  J Mattern; R Koomägi; M Volm
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Correlation of the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors with microvessel density in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Limei Wang; Xiaoyan Liu; Hong Wang; Shuhe Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.967

View more
  14 in total

1.  Predictive factors of visual function recovery after pituitary adenoma resection: a literature review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min Sun; Zhi-Qiang Zhang; Chi-Yuan Ma; Sui-Hua Chen; Xin-Jian Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Analysis of factors affecting visual field recovery following surgery for pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Su Hwan Park; Min Seung Kang; Sang Yoon Kim; Ji-Eun Lee; Jong Hoon Shin; Heeyoung Choi; Su Jin Kim
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Visual Outcomes after Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery in Patients Presenting with Preoperative Visual Deficits.

Authors:  Felipe Fredes; Gabriel Undurraga; Pablo Rojas; Felipe Constanzo; Carolina Lazcano; Jaime Pinto; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-07-19

4.  Predictive model for recovery of visual field after surgery of pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Junwon Lee; Seung Woo Kim; Dong Wook Kim; Joo Youn Shin; Moonjung Choi; Min Chul Oh; Seung Min Kim; Eui Hyun Kim; Sun Ho Kim; Suk Ho Byeon
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Efficacy of sellar opening in the pituitary adenoma resection of transsphenoidal surgery influences the degree of tumor resection.

Authors:  Shousen Wang; Yong Qin; Deyong Xiao; Liangfeng Wei
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Predictive value of preoperative retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for postoperative visual recovery in patients with chiasmal compression.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Sunfu Zhang; Yanlin Song; Chenjing Zhu; Min He; Qingqing Ren; Baoyin Shan; Ziqiong Wang; Yunhui Zeng; Jianguo Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18

7.  Rapid visual field constriction in a patient with retinitis pigmentosa and pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Hayder Al-Hasani; Naheed W Khan; Kari H Branham; John R Heckenlively; Stephen E Sullivan; Lindsey B De Lott; Abigail T Fahim
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2020-06-02

8.  A comparative study of functioning and non-functioning pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Jiayin Qin; Kai Li; Xijuan Wang; Yongzhen Bao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Visual Outcomes after Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenomas: Our Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Max J van Essen; Ivo S Muskens; Nayan Lamba; Stephan F J Belunek; Arthur T J van der Boog; G Johan Amelink; Peter H Gosselaar; Tristan P C van Doormaal; Aline M E Stades; Joost J C Verhoeff; Maria M van Genderen; Christine A E Eenhorst; Marike L D Broekman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-02-03

10.  Parafoveal and Peripapillary Perfusion Predict Visual Field Recovery in Chiasmal Compression due to Pituitary Tumors.

Authors:  Ga-In Lee; Kyung-Ah Park; Sei Yeul Oh; Doo-Sik Kong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.