Literature DB >> 29134164

Visual Outcomes after Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery in Patients Presenting with Preoperative Visual Deficits.

Felipe Fredes1, Gabriel Undurraga1, Pablo Rojas1, Felipe Constanzo2, Carolina Lazcano3, Jaime Pinto4, Thomas Schmidt1.   

Abstract

Introduction  Pituitary adenomas represent 15% of primary brain tumors. Visual disturbance is a common clinical manifestation of these neoplasms due, among other factors, to local mass effect on the optic system. Objective  To evaluate changes of the visual fields in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for pituitary adenomas and to find predictive factors for successful visual field outcome. Material and Methods  This is a cross-sectional study. A review was conducted of medical records of consecutive patients with tumors of the sellar region undergoing EEA between January 2008 and December 2012 at the Skull Base Unit of Guillermo Grant Benavente Hospital, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile, and who had undergone pre- and postoperative visual field evaluation. Results  A total of 35 patients, with a mean age of 50.2 years, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All patients had objective visual field disturbances before the surgery. Following surgery, 25 patients (71.4%) had favorable outcomes, whereas 8 (22.8%) had no change and 2 (5.8%) had an unfavorable outcome. Complete tumor removal was associated with a better visual outcome than those obtained after a subtotal removal. Discussion  The EEA for pituitary tumors is particularly effective for visual field disturbances, with reported improvement rates ranging from 50 to 90%. Our series show similar results, with a 71.4% improvement of visual field disturbances. Conclusion  This study adds further evidence to the current belief that EEA for pituitary adenomas is a safe and effective technique to improve visual field alterations. Complete removal of the tumor during surgery seems to be a predictive factor for a good visual outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic endonasal approach; optic chiasm; optic nerve; pituitary; visual field

Year:  2017        PMID: 29134164      PMCID: PMC5680029          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  27 in total

Review 1.  Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on Primary Management of Patients With Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Joshua William Lucas; Mary E Bodach; Luis M Tumialan; Nelson M Oyesiku; Chirag G Patil; Zachary Litvack; Manish K Aghi; Gabriel Zada
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of giant pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Ricardo J Komotar; Robert M Starke; Daniel M S Raper; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  A decade of pituitary microsurgery. The Herbert Olivecrona lecture.

Authors:  C B Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Prognostic factors of visual field improvement after trans-sphenoidal approach for pituitary macroadenomas: review of the literature and analysis by quantitative method.

Authors:  Lina Raffaella Barzaghi; Marzia Medone; Marco Losa; Stefania Bianchi; Massimo Giovanelli; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Stages of improvement in visual fields after pituitary tumor resection.

Authors:  J B Kerrison; M J Lynn; C A Baer; S A Newman; V Biousse; N J Newman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Pituitary surgery: experience from a large network in Central Switzerland.

Authors:  Sven Berkmann; Javier Fandino; Beat Müller; Karl F Kothbauer; Christoph Henzen; Hans Landolt
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Visual recovery after transsphenoidal removal of pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  A R Cohen; P R Cooper; M J Kupersmith; E S Flamm; J Ransohoff
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Recovery of vision following treatment of pituitary tumours; application of a new system of assessment to patients treated by transsphenoidal operation.

Authors:  G Findlay; R M McFadzean; G Teasdale
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Predicting visual outcome after treatment of pituitary adenomas with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Maud Jacob; Gérald Raverot; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Gilles Perrin; Muriel Rabilloud; Caroline Tilikete; Martine Bernard; Alain Vighetto
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Visual Fields at Presentation and after Trans-sphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Renu Dhasmana; Ramesh C Nagpal; Rahul Sharma; Krishan K Bansal; Harsh Bahadur
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2011-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantitative and functional visual field outcomes after endoscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary adenectomy.

Authors:  Dhruv Parikh; James M W Robins; Tess Garretty; Asim J Sheikh; Atul K Tyagi; Paul A Nix; Nick I Phillips
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 2.  Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with Sinonasal, Nasopharyngeal, and Anterior Skull Base Tumors.

Authors:  Yelda Jozaghi; Jack Phan; Ehab Y Hanna; Michael E Kupferman; Shirley Y Su
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 5.075

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.