Literature DB >> 22073322

Validation of three-dimensional echocardiography for quantification of aortic root geometry: comparison with multi-detector computed tomography.

Jin-Sun Park1, Yong-Woo Choi, Jeoung-Sook Shin, Hyoung-Mo Yang, Hong-Seok Lim, Byoung-Joo Choi, So-Yeon Choi, Myeong-Ho Yoon, Gyo-Seung Hwang, Seung-Jea Tahk, Joon-Han Shin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has been reported to be valuable for evaluating the geometry of cardiac chambers. We validated the accuracy of 3D transthoracic echocardiography for quantifying aortic root geometry in comparison with cardiac multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT).
METHODS: Twenty-three patients who underwent cardiac MDCT and showed normal left ventricular ejection fraction (> 55%), as assessed by 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography, were enrolled (12 male, mean 53 ± 9 years). We defined the aortic root volume as the volume from the aortic annulus to the sinotubular junction. The aortic root volume at end-diastole measured by both cardiac MDCT and 3D echocardiography was assessed.
RESULTS: The cross-sectional area of the aortic root was asymmetric. At the annulus level, the cross-sectional area showed asymmetric triangle. From the aortic annulus to the most dilated point of the sinus of Valsalva, the asymmetric triangular shape was maintained. From the most dilated point of the sinus of Valsalva to the sinotubular junction, the cross-sectional shape of the aortic root changed to oval. The average aortic root volumes measured by 3D echocardiography (ARV-3DE) were 13.6 ± 4.8 mL at end-diastole and 14.1 ± 5.3 mL at end-systole, respectively. The average aortic root volume measured by MDCT at end-diastole (ARV-CT) was 14.1 ± 5.7 mL. At end-diastole, the ARV-3DE correlated well with the ARV-CT (R(2) = 0.926, difference = 0.5 ± 1.7 mL), and the two methods were in excellent agreement (the percent difference was 0%).
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate both the feasibility and accuracy of 3D echocardiography for the clinical assessment of the geometry of the aortic root.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic root geometry; Cardiac multi-detector computed tomography; Three-dimensional echocardiography

Year:  2011        PMID: 22073322      PMCID: PMC3209591          DOI: 10.4250/jcu.2011.19.3.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound        ISSN: 1975-4612


  13 in total

1.  Real-time, three-dimensional echocardiography: feasibility of dynamic right ventricular volume measurement with saline contrast.

Authors:  T Ota; C E Fleishman; M Strub; G Stetten; C J Ohazama; O T von Ramm; J Kisslo
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Real-time, volumetric echocardiography: usefulness of volumetric scanning for the assessment of cardiac volume and function.

Authors:  T Ota; J Kisslo; O T von Ramm; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Aortic root dynamics are asymmetric.

Authors:  Emmanuel Lansac; Hou-Sen Lim; Yu Shomura; Khee Hiang Lim; Nolan T Rice; Wolfgang A Goetz; Carlos M G Duran
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2005-05

4.  A four-dimensional study of the aortic root dynamics.

Authors:  E Lansac; H S Lim; Y Shomura; K H Lim; N T Rice; W Goetz; C Acar; C M G Duran
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 5.  Aortic root dynamics and surgery: from craft to science.

Authors:  Allen Cheng; Paul Dagum; D Craig Miller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Aortic root morphology in patients undergoing percutaneous aortic valve replacement: evidence of aortic root remodeling.

Authors:  Mateen Akhtar; E Murat Tuzcu; Samir R Kapadia; Lars G Svensson; Roy K Greenberg; Eric E Roselli; Sandra Halliburton; Vikram Kurra; Paul Schoenhagen; Srikanth Sola
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  A 'hemispherical' model of aortic valvar geometry.

Authors:  J Scott Rankin; Arthur F Dalley; Philip S Crooke; Robert H Anderson
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2008-03

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Laurens F Tops; David A Wood; Victoria Delgado; Joanne D Schuijf; John R Mayo; Sanjeevan Pasupati; Frouke P L Lamers; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; John G Webb; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05

10.  Left ventricular volume and endocardial surface area by three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with two-dimensional echocardiography and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in normal subjects.

Authors:  A S Gopal; A M Keller; R Rigling; D L King; D L King
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Adult echocardiographic nomograms: overview, critical review and creation of a software for automatic, fast and easy calculation of normal values.

Authors:  Massimiliano Cantinotti; Raffaele Giordano; Marco Paterni; Daniel Saura; Marco Scalese; Eliana Franchi; Nadia Assanta; Martin Koestenberg; Raluca Dulgheru; Tadafumi Sugimoto; Anne Bernard; Luis Caballero; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Aortic root volume and geometry: ready for clinical application?

Authors:  Jong-Min Song
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-09-30

3.  Volume Measurements in Aortic Root Assessment Using Two-Dimensional Echocardiography.

Authors:  Adebayo T Oyedeji; Bolaji E Egbewale; Adeseye A Akintunde; Ebenezer A Ajayi; Olukolade O Owojori; Michael O Balogun
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-28

4.  In vivo assessment of aortic root geometry in normal controls using 3D analysis of computed tomography.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Yang; Dae-Hee Kim; Mark D Handschumacher; Robert A Levine; Joon Bum Kim; Byung Joo Sun; Jeong Yoon Jang; Namkug Kim; Seunghee Baek; Joon-Won Kang; Jong-Min Song; Duk-Hyun Kang; Tae-Hwan Lim; Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 5.  Unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention: integrated use of fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Seung-Jung Park; Jung-Min Ahn; Soo-Jin Kang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.