Literature DB >> 27461206

In vivo assessment of aortic root geometry in normal controls using 3D analysis of computed tomography.

Dong Hyun Yang1, Dae-Hee Kim1, Mark D Handschumacher2, Robert A Levine2, Joon Bum Kim3, Byung Joo Sun1, Jeong Yoon Jang1, Namkug Kim4, Seunghee Baek5, Joon-Won Kang1, Jong-Min Song1, Duk-Hyun Kang1, Tae-Hwan Lim1, Jae-Kwan Song1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Understanding normal asymmetry in the aortic root could aid in the development of new surgical repair techniques or devices with improved haemodynamic performance. The purpose of this study was to assess geometric asymmetry and age-related changes in the normal aortic root using 3D computed tomography. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study of 130 normal subjects (mean age, 51.4 years; 58 men). Specialized 3D software measured individual cusp sinus volumes (CSVs), cusp surface areas (CSAs), and intercommissural distances (ICDs). Age-related aortic root changes were evaluated with simple correlation, ANOVA test among age groups, and multivariable linear regression analyses. The CSV and CSA of left coronary cusp (LCC) were significantly smaller than those of right coronary cusp (RCC) and non-coronary cusp (NCC) (both, P < 0.001) in all age groups. The mean ratios of RCC or NCC-to-LCC were 1.38 and 1.36 for CSV, 1.19 and 1.20 for CSA, and 1.21 and 1.06 for ICD, respectively. The CSV and ICD increased in older age with weak-to-moderate correlation coefficients in both men and women. By multivariable linear regression, CSVs and ICDs of all cusps showed a positive correlation with age (P < 0.05), and the female gender was associated with a smaller size of the CSV and CSA.
CONCLUSIONS: The LCC was significantly smaller than the other two cusps, and the aortic root size increased with age. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic root; computed tomography; three-dimensional analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27461206      PMCID: PMC6279090          DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jew146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  26 in total

1.  Aortic root geometry: pattern of differences between leaflets and sinuses of Valsalva.

Authors:  S J Choo; G McRae; J P Olomon; G St George; W Davis; C L Burleson-Bowles; D Pang; H H Luo; D Vavra; D T Cheung; J H Oury; C M Duran
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  1999-07

Review 2.  Correlation and simple linear regression.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Kemal Tuncali; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The anatomy of the aortic root.

Authors:  Denis Berdajs; Patonay Lajos; Marko Turina
Journal:  Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-08

4.  Remodeling or reimplantation for valve-sparing aortic root surgery?

Authors:  Armin W Erasmi; Hans-H Sievers; J F Matthias Bechtel; Thorsten Hanke; Ulrich Stierle; Martin Misfeld
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Early and 1-year outcomes of aortic root surgery in patients with Marfan syndrome: a prospective, multicenter, comparative study.

Authors:  Joseph S Coselli; Irina V Volguina; Scott A LeMaire; Thoralf M Sundt; Heidi M Connolly; Elizabeth H Stephens; Hartzell V Schaff; Dianna M Milewicz; Luca A Vricella; Harry C Dietz; Charles G Minard; D Craig Miller
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Stress variations in the human aortic root and valve: the role of anatomic asymmetry.

Authors:  K J Grande; R P Cochran; P G Reinhall; K S Kunzelman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  The dynamic aortic root. Its role in aortic valve function.

Authors:  R J Brewer; J D Deck; B Capati; S P Nolan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Aortic valve repair and aortic valve-sparing operations.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Differences in aortic cusp coaptation between the reimplantation and the remodeling techniques of aortic valve-sparing surgery: an in vitro porcine model study.

Authors:  Daniele Maselli; Luca Weltert; Raffaele Scaffa; Saverio Nardella; Lorenzo Guerrieri Wolf; Ruggero De Paulis
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  In vivo measurement of mitral leaflet surface area and subvalvular geometry in patients with asymmetrical septal hypertrophy: insights into the mechanism of outflow tract obstruction.

Authors:  Dae-Hee Kim; Mark D Handschumacher; Robert A Levine; Yun-Sil Choi; Yun Jeong Kim; Sung-Cheol Yun; Jong-Min Song; Duk-Hyun Kang; Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

1.  Preoperative Cardiac Computed Tomography Characteristics Associated with Recurrent Aortic Regurgitation after Aortic Valve Re-Implantation.

Authors:  Yura Ahn; Hyun Jung Koo; Sahmin Lee; Dae Hee Kim; Jong Min Song; Duk Hyun Kang; Jae Kwan Song; Ho Jin Kim; Joon Bum Kim; Sung Ho Jung; Suk Jung Choo; Cheol Hyun Chung; Jae Won Lee; Joon Won Kang; Dong Hyun Yang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.500

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.