Literature DB >> 22073321

Aortic root volume and geometry: ready for clinical application?

Jong-Min Song1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22073321      PMCID: PMC3209590          DOI: 10.4250/jcu.2011.19.3.126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound        ISSN: 1975-4612


× No keyword cloud information.
REFER TO THE PAGE 128-133 Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) is a useful imaging modality that can be easily performed in the clinical practice, and has been proven to be applicable in measuring the real volumes of cardiac chambers such as left ventricle,1-3) left atrium,4)5) and right ventricle,6)7) without geometric assumption. The volumes measured using RT3DE are well correlated with volumes assessed using other imaging tools such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multi-detector computed tomography (CT). However, volumes calculated using RT3DE tend to be smaller than those obtained using cardiac MRI, and this discrepancy might be attributed to a low spatial resolution of RT3DE. It was reported that minimal changes in endocardial surface position (1 mm) resulted in significant differences in measured volumes (11%) in measuring left ventricular volume using RT3DE.1) Therefore, guidelines for measuring volumes using RT3DE is necessary to avoid volume underestimations and to reduce inter- and intra-observer variabilities. The authors of the study titled "Validation of three-dimensional echocardiography for quantification of aortic root geometry; Comparison with multi-detector computed tomography" demonstrated 3-dimensional aortic root shape and excellent correlation between aortic root volumes measured using RT3DE and multi-detector CT.8) This is another application of volume measurement using RT3DE. They found that aortic root volumes at end-diastole measured by RT3DE correlated well with those by multi-detector CT, and the agreement between the two was excellent. The results of this study showed feasibility and accuracy of RT3DE for clinical assessment of geometry and volume of aortic root. There are however several issues to resolve before applying these findings to clinical practice. First, analyses of RT3DE images are time-consuming. Although authors of this study did not present the time duration required for the image analysis, 20-30 minutes would be necessary to analyze one image including time needed for manual border correction. Therefore, automatic border detection protocol with higher accuracy, which can obviate time-consuming process of manual correction, should be developed for more universal clinical usage. Second, a low spatial resolution of RT3DE and tracing inner border of aortic wall might underestimate aortic root volume. Although there was no significant difference between aortic root volumes measured using RT3DE and multi-detector CT in this study, there was a tendency that the former is smaller than the latter. Therefore, tracing more outer dense line rather than tracing inner border of the aortic wall may be a better method. Last but not least, how can we apply the findings revealed in this study using RT3DE images about aortic root volume and geometry into clinical practice? Since the study excluded patients who have any pathologic findings that could affect aortic root geometry, the results of this study cannot be extrapolated to the patients suffering from aortic root pathology. Further investigations should be necessary to verify whether this study result remains true in patients with aortic root pathology such as aortic annuloectasia and Marfan syndrome. RT3DE evaluation of aortic root volume may be useful in following up aortic root dilation in such patients as well as patients with aortic regurgitation.9) The analyses using RT3DE of geometric components constituting entire aortic root may be of greater clinical use than simple measurement of aortic root volume. Although aortic annulus may not be a distinct anatomic structure,10) evaluating annulus shape and diameters is essential to implement transcatheter aortic valve implantation. In the current study, aortic annulus appeared to be asymmetric triangular. Aortic annulus shape was reported to be oval rather than circular in previous reports.11)12) Annulus shape and diameter can be evaluated in each patient and taken into consideration in determining prosthetic valve size.13) The distance between aortic annulus and ostium of coronary arteries, which is critical in performing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, can be measured from CT images.12)14) This parameter may be also measurable from the images of transesophageal RT3DE. Furthermore, aortic root dilation is not always uniform and symmetrical, but rather eccentric and asymmetrical. One coronary sinus may be substantially more enlarged than other two sinuses.15)16) The asymmetry of sinus dilation and individual variation may be visualized and quantified using RT3DE, and this geometric information may be useful to surgeon in planning aortic valve repair surgery or aortic root replacement with the use of stentless auto-, homo- and xenografts. The measurement of individual volumes of each sinus may provide more clinically relevant information.16) Finally, 3-dimensional deformations of aortic root during a cardiac cycle have been evaluated in several animal studies.17-19) Geometric analysis for 3-dimensional deformation of human aortic root may be possible using RT3DE, and it may provide physiologic information regarding aortic accommodation of ejected stroke volume and help to develop more ideal method for aortic root surgery. The novel application of RT3DE for evaluating aortic root and measuring aortic root volume would be the first step to develop new dedicated software for this purpose and extend this technology to diagnose and evaluate aortic root diseases. The progression in the clinical application of this technology will help to provide tailored and appropriate management to patients with aortic root diseases.
  19 in total

1.  Deformational dynamics of the aortic root: modes and physiologic determinants.

Authors:  P Dagum; G R Green; F J Nistal; G T Daughters; T A Timek; L E Foppiano; A F Bolger; N B Ingels; D C Miller
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Aortic root geometry: pattern of differences between leaflets and sinuses of Valsalva.

Authors:  S J Choo; G McRae; J P Olomon; G St George; W Davis; C L Burleson-Bowles; D Pang; H H Luo; D Vavra; D T Cheung; J H Oury; C M Duran
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  1999-07

Review 3.  Clinical anatomy of the aortic root.

Authors:  R H Anderson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  The anatomy of the aortic root.

Authors:  Denis Berdajs; Patonay Lajos; Marko Turina
Journal:  Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-08

5.  Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes: multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of sources of error.

Authors:  Victor Mor-Avi; Carly Jenkins; Harald P Kühl; Hans-Joachim Nesser; Thomas Marwick; Andreas Franke; Christian Ebner; Benjamin H Freed; Regina Steringer-Mascherbauer; Heidi Pollard; Lynn Weinert; Johannes Niel; Lissa Sugeng; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-07

6.  Aortic root morphology in patients undergoing percutaneous aortic valve replacement: evidence of aortic root remodeling.

Authors:  Mateen Akhtar; E Murat Tuzcu; Samir R Kapadia; Lars G Svensson; Roy K Greenberg; Eric E Roselli; Sandra Halliburton; Vikram Kurra; Paul Schoenhagen; Srikanth Sola
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Three dimensional evaluation of the aortic annulus using multislice computer tomography: are manufacturer's guidelines for sizing for percutaneous aortic valve replacement helpful?

Authors:  Carl J Schultz; Adriaan Moelker; Nicolo Piazza; Apostolos Tzikas; Amber Otten; Rutger J Nuis; Lisan A Neefjes; Robert J van Geuns; Pim de Feyter; Gabriel Krestin; Patrick W Serruys; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional echocardiography with sequential magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating left ventricular volume and ejection fraction over time in patients with healed myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Carly Jenkins; Kristen Bricknell; Jonathan Chan; Lizelle Hanekom; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of the progression of aortic root size in 127 patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: role of the supraaortic ridge and relation to the progression of the lesion.

Authors:  L R Padial; A Oliver; A Sagie; A E Weyman; M E King; R A Levine
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Laurens F Tops; David A Wood; Victoria Delgado; Joanne D Schuijf; John R Mayo; Sanjeevan Pasupati; Frouke P L Lamers; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; John G Webb; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Volume Measurements in Aortic Root Assessment Using Two-Dimensional Echocardiography.

Authors:  Adebayo T Oyedeji; Bolaji E Egbewale; Adeseye A Akintunde; Ebenezer A Ajayi; Olukolade O Owojori; Michael O Balogun
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.