Literature DB >> 22059574

Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection.

M E Goddard1, B J Hayes, T H E Meuwissen.   

Abstract

Estimated breeding values (EBVs) using data from genetic markers can be predicted using a genomic relationship matrix, derived from animal's genotypes, and best linear unbiased prediction. However, if the accuracy of the EBVs is calculated in the usual manner (from the inverse element of the coefficient matrix), it is likely to be overestimated owing to sampling errors in elements of the genomic relationship matrix. We show here that the correct accuracy can be obtained by regressing the relationship matrix towards the pedigree relationship matrix so that it is an unbiased estimate of the relationships at the QTL controlling the trait. This method shows how the accuracy increases as the number of markers used increases because the regression coefficient (of genomic relationship towards pedigree relationship) increases. We also present a deterministic method for predicting the accuracy of such genomic EBVs before data on individual animals are collected. This method estimates the proportion of genetic variance explained by the markers, which is equal to the regression coefficient described above, and the accuracy with which marker effects are estimated. The latter depends on the variance in relationship between pairs of animals, which equals the mean linkage disequilibrium over all pairs of loci. The theory was validated using simulated data and data on fat concentration in the milk of Holstein cattle.
© 2011 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22059574     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00964.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  117 in total

1.  An Equation to Predict the Accuracy of Genomic Values by Combining Data from Multiple Traits, Populations, or Environments.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Piter Bijma; Roel F Veerkamp; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Optimizing the allocation of resources for genomic selection in one breeding cycle.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.

Authors:  Pascal Schopp; Dominik Müller; Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Shrinkage estimation of the genomic relationship matrix can improve genomic estimated breeding values in the training set.

Authors:  Dominik Müller; Frank Technow; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  The effect of linkage disequilibrium and family relationships on the reliability of genomic prediction.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Roel F Veerkamp; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction.

Authors:  David Habier; Rohan L Fernando; Dorian J Garrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The effects of demography and long-term selection on the accuracy of genomic prediction with sequence data.

Authors:  Iona M MacLeod; Ben J Hayes; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.

Authors:  Mohammad S A Bhuiyan; Yeong Kuk Kim; Hyun Joo Kim; Doo Ho Lee; Soo Hyun Lee; Ho Baek Yoon; Seung Hwan Lee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in Chinese Holstein cattle by using one-step blending.

Authors:  Xiujin Li; Sheng Wang; Ju Huang; Leyi Li; Qin Zhang; Xiangdong Ding
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Genome-wide prediction for complex traits under the presence of dominance effects in simulated populations using GBLUP and machine learning methods.

Authors:  Anderson Antonio Carvalho Alves; Rebeka Magalhães da Costa; Tiago Bresolin; Gerardo Alves Fernandes Júnior; Rafael Espigolan; André Mauric Frossard Ribeiro; Roberto Carvalheiro; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.