Literature DB >> 22051457

Ionizing radiation in abdominal CT: unindicated multiphase scans are an important source of medically unnecessary exposure.

Kristie M Guite1, J Louis Hinshaw, Frank N Ranallo, Mary J Lindstrom, Fred T Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: CT radiation exposure has come under increasing scrutiny because of dramatically increased utilization. Multiphase CT studies (repeated scanning before and after contrast injection) are a potentially important, overlooked source of medically unnecessary radiation because of the dose-multiplier effect of extra phases. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of unindicated multiphase scanning and resultant excess radiation exposure in a sample referral population.
METHODS: Abdominal and pelvic CT examinations (n = 500) performed at outside institutions submitted for tertiary interpretation were retrospectively reviewed for (1) the appropriateness of each phase on the basis of clinical indication and ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) and (2) per phase and total radiation effective dose.
RESULTS: A total of 978 phases were performed in 500 patients; 52.8% (264 of 500) received phases that were not supported by ACR criteria. Overall, 35.8% of phases (350 of 978) were unindicated, most commonly being delayed imaging (272 of 350). The mean overall total radiation effective dose per patient was 25.8 mSv (95% confidence interval, 24.2-27.5 mSv). The mean effective dose for unindicated phases was 13.1 mSv (95% confidence interval, 12.3-14.0 mSv), resulting in a mean excess effective dose of 16.8 mSv (95% confidence interval, 15.5-18.3 mSv) per patient. Unindicated radiation constituted 33.3% of the total radiation effective dose in this population. Radiation effective doses exceeding 50 mSv were found in 21.2% of patients (106 of 500).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that a large proportion of patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic CT scanning receive unindicated additional phases that add substantial excess radiation dose with no associated clinical benefit. Copyright Â
© 2011 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22051457      PMCID: PMC4131253          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  25 in total

1.  Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  D A Pierce; D L Preston
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients?

Authors:  A Paterson; D P Frush; L F Donnelly
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Relationship between cellular radiosensitivity and non-repaired double-strand breaks studied for different growth states, dose rates and plating conditions in a normal human fibroblast line.

Authors:  E Dikomey; I Brammer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose.

Authors:  F A Mettler; P W Wiest; J A Locken; C A Kelsey
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.394

6.  Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950-1990.

Authors:  D A Pierce; Y Shimizu; D L Preston; M Vaeth; K Mabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose).

Authors:  Holger Greess; Anton Nömayr; Heiko Wolf; Ulrich Baum; Michael Lell; Bernhard Böwing; Willi Kalender; Werner A Bautz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Increased repair of gamma-induced DNA double-strand breaks at lower dose-rate in CHO cells.

Authors:  Didier Boucher; Joëlle Hindo; Dietrich Averbeck
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.273

Review 9.  Studies on the Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors, and their use in estimating radiation risks.

Authors:  C R Muirhead
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation.

Authors:  Denis Tack; Viviane De Maertelaer; Pierre Alain Gevenois
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  17 in total

1.  Computed tomography use in a large Italian region: trend analysis 2004-2014 of emergency and outpatient CT examinations in children and adults.

Authors:  Andrea Pola; Daniela Corbella; Andrea Righini; Alberto Torresin; Paola E Colombo; Luigi Vismara; Luca Trombetta; Michele Maddalo; Maria Vittoria Introini; Daniela Tinelli; Laura Strohmenger; Giovanna Garattini; Angelica Munari; Fabio Triulzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of diagnostic performance between single- and multiphasic contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography in patients admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain: potential radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Shin Hye Hwang; Je Sung You; Mi Kyong Song; Jin-Young Choi; Myeong-Jin Kim; Yong Eun Chung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  'Here's looking at you, kid' … again? Revisiting multiphase CT in children.

Authors:  Donald P Frush
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-09-03

4.  Diagnostic efficacy of single-pass abdominal multidetector-row CT: prospective evaluation of a low dose protocol.

Authors:  Luigi Camera; Immacolata Liccardo; Federica Romano; Raffaele Liuzzi; Antonio Rispo; Massimo Imbriaco; Anna Testa; Gaetano Luglio; Simona De Fronzo; Fabiana Castiglione; Luigi Bucci; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Computed Tomography Radiation Exposure Among Referred Kidney Stone Patients: Results from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter.

Authors:  David T Tzou; Samuel Zetumer; Manint Usawachintachit; Kazumi Taguchi; Seth K Bechis; Brian D Duty; Jonathan D Harper; Ryan S Hsi; Mathew Sorensen; Roger L Sur; Shalonda Reliford-Titus; Helena C Chang; Dylan Isaacson; David B Bayne; Zhen J Wang; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; John Heil; Vinit Baliyan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Multiphase acquisitions in pediatric abdominal-pelvic CT are a common practice and contribute to unnecessary radiation dose.

Authors:  Bradley S Rostad; Kimberly E Applegate; Tammy Kim; Renee M Mansour; Sarah S Milla
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-07-07

8.  An Image Quality-informed Framework for CT Characterization.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Sophronia Yu; Yifei Wang; Marc D Kohli; Philip Chu; Robert Chung; Jason Luong; Denise Bos; Carly Stewart; Biraj Bista; Alejandro Alejandrez Cisneros; Bradley Delman; Andrew J Einstein; Michael Flynn; Patrick Romano; J Anthony Seibert; Antonio C Westphalen; Andrew Bindman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Triphasic CT in the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischaemia.

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Najla Fasih; Wael Shabana
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  A questionnaire survey reviewing radiologists' and clinical specialist radiographers' knowledge of CT exposure parameters.

Authors:  S J Foley; M G Evanoff; L A Rainford
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.