Literature DB >> 10931690

Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors.

D A Pierce1, D L Preston.   

Abstract

To clarify the information in the Radiation Effects Research Foundation data regarding cancer risks of low radiation doses, we focus on survivors with doses less than 0.5 Sv. For reasons indicated, we also restrict attention mainly to survivors within 3, 000 m of the hypocenter of the bombs. Analysis is of solid cancer incidence from 1958-1994, involving 7,000 cancer cases among 50,000 survivors in that dose and distance range. The results provide useful risk estimates for doses as low as 0.05-0.1 Sv, which are not overestimated by linear risk estimates computed from the wider dose ranges 0-2 Sv or 0-4 Sv. There is a statistically significant risk in the range 0-0.1 Sv, and an upper confidence limit on any possible threshold is computed as 0.06 Sv. It is indicated that modification of the neutron dose estimates currently under consideration would not markedly change the conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10931690     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)154[0178:rrcral]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  159 in total

1.  Radiation risk to low fluences of alpha particles may be greater than we thought.

Authors:  H Zhou; M Suzuki; G Randers-Pehrson; D Vannais; G Chen; J E Trosko; C A Waldren; T K Hei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-07

Review 3.  Perfect is the enemy of the very good.

Authors:  Thomas L Slovis; Walter E Berdon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-06

4.  Low-dose radiation: thresholds, bystander effects, and adaptive responses.

Authors:  William M Bonner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  MRI in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Michael S Gee; Mukesh G Harisinghani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Choice of model and uncertainties of the gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry in relation to the chromosome aberrations data in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Authors:  W Rühm; L Walsh; M Chomentowski
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  DNA double-strand breaks as potential indicators for the biological effects of ionising radiation exposure from cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Johannes Greupner; Michael Laule; Fabian Knebel; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications.

Authors:  Bridget Sinnott; Elaine Ron; Arthur B Schneider
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 10.  Current knowledge on tumour induction by computed tomography should be carefully used.

Authors:  Cristian Candela-Juan; Alegría Montoro; Enrique Ruiz-Martínez; Juan Ignacio Villaescusa; Luis Martí-Bonmatí
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.