Literature DB >> 29980861

Multiphase acquisitions in pediatric abdominal-pelvic CT are a common practice and contribute to unnecessary radiation dose.

Bradley S Rostad1,2, Kimberly E Applegate3, Tammy Kim4, Renee M Mansour5, Sarah S Milla5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients at our pediatric hospital have had a contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis performed by an outside imaging facility before admission. We have noticed that many of these exams are multiphase, which may contribute to unnecessary radiation dose.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of multiphase acquisitions and radiation dose indices in contrast-enhanced CTs of the abdomen and pelvis performed by outside imaging facilities in patients who were subsequently transferred to our pediatric hospital for care, and compare these metrics to contrast-enhanced CTs of the abdomen and pelvis performed internally.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of contrast-enhanced CTs of the abdomen and pelvis from outside imaging facilities uploaded to our picture archiving and communication system (PACS) between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015. CT images and dose pages were reviewed to determine the number of phases and dose indices (CT dose index-volume [CTDIvol], dose-length product, size-specific dose estimate). Exams for abdominal or pelvic mass, trauma or urinary leak indications were excluded. Data were compared to internally acquired contrast-enhanced CTs of the abdomen and pelvis by querying the American College of Radiology (ACR) Dose Index Registry. This review was institutional review board and HIPAA compliant.
RESULTS: There were 754 contrast-enhanced CTs of the abdomen and pelvis from 104 outside imaging facilities. Fifty-three percent (399/754) had 2 phases, and 2% (14/754) had 3 or more phases. Of the 939 contrast-enhanced CTs of the abdomen and pelvis performed internally, 12% (115) were multiphase exams. Of 88% (664) contrast-enhanced CTs of the abdomen and pelvis from outside imaging facilities with dose data, CTDIvol was 2.7 times higher than our institution contrast-enhanced CTs of the abdomen and pelvis (939) for all age categories as defined by the ACR Dose Index Registry (mean: 9.4 vs. 3.5 mGy, P<0.0001). The majority (74%) of multiphase exams were performed by 9 of 104 outside imaging facilities.
CONCLUSION: Multiphase acquisitions in routine contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis exams at outside imaging facilities are more frequent than those at a dedicated pediatric institution and contribute to unnecessary radiation dose. A contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis exam from an outside imaging facility with two passes may have as much as four times to six times the dose as the same exam performed with a single pass at a pediatric imaging center. We advocate for imaging facilities with high multiphase rates to eliminate multiple phases from routine contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis exams in children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Community hospitals; Computed tomography; Image Gently; Pediatric hospitals; Radiation dose indices

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29980861     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-018-4192-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  18 in total

1.  Quality of pediatric abdominal CT scans performed at a dedicated children's hospital and its referring institutions: a multifactorial evaluation.

Authors:  Aisling Snow; Carly E Milliren; Dionne A Graham; Michael J Callahan; Robert D MacDougall; Richard L Robertson; George A Taylor
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-01-13

2.  The 'Image Gently' campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Kimberly E Applegate; Jennifer Boylan; Penny F Butler; Michael J Callahan; Brian D Coley; Shawn Farley; Donald P Frush; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Diego Jaramillo; Neil D Johnson; Sue C Kaste; Gregory Morrison; Keith J Strauss; Nora Tuggle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-01-17

3.  A comparison study of size-specific dose estimate calculation methods.

Authors:  Roshni A Parikh; Michael A Wien; Ronald D Novak; David W Jordan; Paul Klahr; Stephanie Soriano; Leslie Ciancibello; Sheila C Berlin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27

4.  Image Gently 5 years later: what goals remain to be accomplished in radiation protection for children?

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Kimberly E Applegate; Dorothy Bulas; Priscilla F Butler; Michael J Callahan; Steven Don; Shawn Farley; Donald Frush; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Susan D John; Sue C Kaste; Sarah Kaupp; Ceela McElveny; Greg Morrison; Manrita Sidhu; Keith Strauss; S Ted Treves
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Dose is not always what it seems: where very misleading values can result from volume CT dose index and dose length product.

Authors:  J Anthony Seibert; John M Boone; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges; Ramit Lamba
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 6.  Dose indices: everybody wants a number.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

7.  Ionizing radiation in abdominal CT: unindicated multiphase scans are an important source of medically unnecessary exposure.

Authors:  Kristie M Guite; J Louis Hinshaw; Frank N Ranallo; Mary J Lindstrom; Fred T Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Performance of CT examinations in children with suspected acute appendicitis in the community setting: a need for more education.

Authors:  Michael E Kim; Robert C Orth; Sara C Fallon; Monica E Lopez; Mary L Brandt; Wei Zhang; George S Bisset
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Image Gently: progress and challenges in CT education and advocacy.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Kimberly E Applegate; Dorothy Bulas; Priscilla F Butler; Michael J Callahan; Brian D Coley; Steven Don; Donald P Frush; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Sue C Kaste; Gregory Morrison; Manrita Sidhu; Keith J Strauss; S Ted Treves
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17

10.  Diagnostic reference ranges for pediatric abdominal CT.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Keith J Strauss; Laura P Coombs; Keith E Mandel; Alexander J Towbin; David B Larson; Michael J Callahan; Kassa Darge; Daniel J Podberesky; Donald P Frush; Sjirk J Westra; Jeffrey S Prince
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  7 in total

1.  'Here's looking at you, kid' … again? Revisiting multiphase CT in children.

Authors:  Donald P Frush
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-09-03

2.  Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; John Heil; Vinit Baliyan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Utilization of computed tomography imaging in the pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Daniel Jack Frush; Clayton W Commander; Terry Scott Hartman; Aaron Kyle Cecil; Brian Douglas Handly; Daniel B Park; Lynn Ansley Fordham
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-12-05

Review 4.  Pediatric trauma and the role of the interventional radiologist.

Authors:  Aparna Annam; Shellie Josephs; Thor Johnson; Ann M Kulungowski; Richard B Towbin; Anne Marie Cahill
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 5.  [Radiological diagnosis of pelvic ring fractures].

Authors:  Thomas Grieser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  A case report on ultrasound evaluation of pediatric post-operative abdominal pain.

Authors:  Alexander B White; Daniel R Bacon; Kristen Olinger; Jeffrey J Dehmer
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-09-08

7.  Multiphase abdomen-pelvis CT in women of childbearing potential (WOCBP): Justification and radiation dose.

Authors:  Huda Al Naemi; Antar Aly; Mohamad Hassan Kharita; Shatha Al Hilli; Amal Al Obadli; Ramandeep Singh; Madan M Rehani; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.