Literature DB >> 22046490

Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery.

Se-Jin Baek1, Dong-Woo Lee, Sung-Soo Park, Seon-Hahn Kim.   

Abstract

In an effort to minimize the limitations of laparoscopy, a robotic surgery system was introduced, but its role for gastric cancer is still unclear. The objective of this article is to assess the current status of robotic surgery for gastric cancer and to predict future prospects. Although the current study was limited by its small number of patients and retrospective nature, robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer is a feasible and safe procedure for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Most studies have reported satisfactory results for postoperative short-term coutcomes, such as: postoperative oral feeding, gas out, hospital stay and complications, compared with laparoscopic surgery; the difference is a longer operation time. However, robotic surgery showed a shallow learning curve compared with the familarity of conventional open surgery; after the accumulation of several cases, robotic surgery could be expected to result in a similar operation time. Robotic-assisted gastrectomy can expand the indications of minimally invasive surgery to include advanced gastric cancer by improving the ability to perform lymphadenectomy. Moreover, "total" robotic gastrectomy can be facilitated using a robot-sewing technique and gastric submucosal tumors near the gastroesophageal junction or pylorus can be resected safely by this novel technique. In conclusion, robot-assisted gastrectomy may offer a good alternative to conventional open or laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer, provided that long-term oncologic outcomes can be confirmed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgery; Robot surgery; Stomach

Year:  2011        PMID: 22046490      PMCID: PMC3205112          DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v3.i10.137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol


  66 in total

1.  Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; A Craig Lynch; Anthony J Senagore; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

Authors:  Anthony R Lanfranco; Andres E Castellanos; Jaydev P Desai; William C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Jyewon Song; Sung Jin Oh; Wook Ho Kang; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging and radical hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system.

Authors:  Aaron Shafer; John F Boggess
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Completely laparoscopic extraperigastric lymph node dissection for gastric malignancies located in the middle or lower third of the stomach.

Authors:  Ichiro Uyama; Atsushi Sugioka; Junko Fujita; Yoshiyuki Komori; Hideo Matsui; Ryohei Soga; Atsushi Wakayama; Kiichiro Okamoto; Akihiro Ohyama; Akitake Hasumi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up.

Authors:  Albert A Mikhail; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ehab S Billatos; Kevin C Zorn; Edward M Gong; Charles B Brendler; Gregory P Zagaja; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  First experiences with the da Vinci operating robot in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  J Bodner; H Wykypiel; G Wetscher; T Schmid
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Outcomes and survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Analysis on 65 patients operated on by conventional or robot-assisted minimal access procedures.

Authors:  R Pugliese; D Maggioni; F Sansonna; G C Ferrari; A Forgione; A Costanzi; C Magistro; J Pauna; S Di Lernia; D Citterio; C Brambilla
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Minimally invasive mitral valve repair using the da Vinci robotic system.

Authors:  Antone J Tatooles; Patroklos S Pappas; Paul J Gordon; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  A comparison of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Kojima; Hiroyuki Yamada; Mikito Inokuchi; Tatsuyuki Kawano; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  14 in total

1.  Robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy enables surgeons to perform distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using electric cautery devices alone.

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Osamu Ikeda; Masako Urata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.

Authors:  Young Suk Park; Aung Myint Oo; Sang-Yong Son; Dong Joon Shin; Do Hyun Jung; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robotic surgery in Italy national survey (2011).

Authors:  Eugenio Santoro; Vito Pansadoro
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2012-12-08

5.  The impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes after robotic liver resection.

Authors:  Iswanto Sucandy; Abdelrahman Attili; Janelle Spence; Timothy Bordeau; Sharona Ross; Alexander Rosemurgy
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-02-01

Review 6.  Robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: current status and technical considerations.

Authors:  Andrea Coratti; Mario Annecchiarico; Michele Di Marino; Edoardo Gentile; Francesco Coratti; Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  [Robotic hepatobiliary and gastric surgery].

Authors:  L Milone; A Coratti; D Daskalaki; E Fernandes; P C Giulianotti
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prospective observational studies.

Authors:  Zheng Bobo; Wang Xin; Li Jiang; Wang Quan; Bi Liang; Deng Xiangbing; Wang Ziqiang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Robotic versus Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandra Marano; Yoon Young Choi; Woo Jin Hyung; Yoo Min Kim; Jieun Kim; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.720

10.  Robotic gastrectomy: the current state of the art.

Authors:  Alessandra Marano; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.720

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.