Literature DB >> 23942961

[Robotic hepatobiliary and gastric surgery].

L Milone1, A Coratti, D Daskalaki, E Fernandes, P C Giulianotti.   

Abstract

Hepatobiliary surgery is a challenging surgical subspecialty that requires highly specialized training and an adequate level of experience in order to be performed safely. As a result, minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery has been met with slower acceptance as compared to other subspecialties, with many surgeons in the field still reluctant about the approach. On the other hand, gastric surgery is a very popular field of surgery with an extensive amount of literature especially regarding open and laparoscopic surgery but not much about the robotic approach especially for oncological disease. Recent development of the robotic platform has provided a tool able to overcome many of the limitations of conventional laparoscopic hepatobiliary surgery. Augmented dexterity enabled by the endowristed movements, software filtration of the surgeon's movements, and high-definition three-dimensional vision provided by the stereoscopic camera, allow for steady and careful dissection of the liver hilum structures, as well as prompt and precise endosuturing in cases of intraoperative bleeding. These advantages have fostered many centers to widen the indications for minimally invasive hepatobiliary and gastric surgery, with encouraging initial results. As one of the surgical groups that has performed the largest number of robot-assisted procedures worldwide, we provide a review of the state of the art in minimally invasive robot-assisted hepatobiliary and gastric surgery.The English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink (under supplemental).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23942961     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-013-2581-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  101 in total

1.  Robot-assisted choledochotomy: feasibility.

Authors:  G Roeyen; T Chapelle; D Ysebaert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of short outcomes.

Authors:  Binghong Xiong; Li Ma; Caiquan Zhang
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.279

3.  Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Jyewon Song; Sung Jin Oh; Wook Ho Kang; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Jai Deep Thakur; Mahak Garg; Geetha R Menon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Congenital choledochal cyst: video-guided laparoscopic treatment.

Authors:  G A Farello; A Cerofolini; M Rebonato; G Bergamaschi; C Ferrari; A Chiappetta
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1995-10

6.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Gerard J Abood; M Fatih Can; Mustapha Daouadi; Harold T Huss; Jennifer Y Steve; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Michael Stang; David L Bartlett; Herbert J Zeh; A James Moser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Laparoscopic pancreas- and spleen-preserving D2 lymph node dissection in advanced (cT2) upper-third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hoon Hur; Hae Myung Jeon; Wook Kim
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  A comparison of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Kojima; Hiroyuki Yamada; Mikito Inokuchi; Tatsuyuki Kawano; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it an alternative to the open approach?

Authors:  Danny Yakoub; Thanos Athanasiou; Paris Tekkis; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.279

10.  The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Nicholas O'Rourke; David Iannitti; Ibrahim Dagher; Alan J Koffron; Mark Thomas; Brice Gayet; Ho Seong Han; Go Wakabayashi; Giulio Belli; Hironori Kaneko; Chen-Guo Ker; Olivier Scatton; Alexis Laurent; Eddie K Abdalla; Prosanto Chaudhury; Erik Dutson; Clark Gamblin; Michael D'Angelica; David Nagorney; Giuliano Testa; Daniel Labow; Derrik Manas; Ronnie T Poon; Heidi Nelson; Robert Martin; Bryan Clary; Wright C Pinson; John Martinie; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Robert Goldstein; Sasan Roayaie; David Barlet; Joseph Espat; Michael Abecassis; Myrddin Rees; Yuman Fong; Kelly M McMasters; Christoph Broelsch; Ron Busuttil; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Strasberg; Ravi S Chari
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.