Literature DB >> 15082292

First experiences with the da Vinci operating robot in thoracic surgery.

J Bodner1, H Wykypiel, G Wetscher, T Schmid.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The da Vinci surgical robotic system was purchased at our institution in June 2001. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the applicability of the da Vinci operation robot for general thoracic procedures.
METHODS: The da Vinci surgical system consists of a console connected to a surgical arm cart, a manipulator unit with two instrument arms and a central arm to guide the endoscope. The surgical instruments are introduced via special ports and attached to the arms of the robot. The surgeon, sitting at the console, triggers highly sensitive motion sensors that transfer the surgeon's movements to the tip of the instruments. The so-called 'EndoWrist technology' offers seven degrees of movement, thus exceeding the capacity of a surgeon's hand in open surgery. We evaluated the role of the robot for several thoracic procedures such as thymectomies, fundoplications, esophageal dissections, resection of mediastinal masses and a pulmonary lobectomy.
RESULTS: A total of 10 thymectomies, 16 fundoplications, 4 esophageal dissections, 5 extirpations of benign mediastinal masses and 1 right lower lobectomy was performed with the robot. One resection of a paravertebral neurogenic tumor had to be converted due to surgical problems. A lesion to a left recurrent laryngeal nerve caused transient hoarseness after the extirpation of an ectopic parathyroid in the aortopulmonary window in one patient. The postoperative courses were uneventful and patients were discharged between postoperative days 3 and 8 (with the exception of patients who underwent dissection for esophageal cancer and the patient with conversion to an open access).
CONCLUSIONS: Advanced general thoracic procedures can be performed safely with the da Vinci robot allowing precise dissection in remote and difficult-to-reach areas. This benefit becomes evident most elegantly in thymectomies, which at our institution have become a routine procedure with the robot. The rigid anatomy of the chest seems to be an ideal condition for robotic surgery. A major limitation for robotic surgery is the lack of more appropriate instruments. This disadvantage becomes most evident in pulmonary lobectomies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15082292     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  55 in total

1.  Postoperative incidence of incarcerated hiatal hernia and its prevention after robotic transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  John Sutherland; Nilanjana Banerji; Julie Morphew; Eric Johnson; Daniel Dunn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robot-assisted biopsy using ultrasound guidance: initial results from in vitro tests.

Authors:  Joachim Kettenbach; Gernot Kronreif; Michael Figl; Martin Fürst; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Rudolf Hanel; Helmar Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Supervised Autonomous Electrosurgery via Biocompatible Near-Infrared Tissue Tracking Techniques.

Authors:  H Saeidi; J Ge; M Kam; J D Opfermann; S Leonard; A S Joshi; A Krieger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics       Date:  2019-10-28

4.  A critical comparison of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic splenectomies.

Authors:  Johannes Bodner; Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch; Paolo Lucciarini; John H Fish; Thomas Schmid
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The mechanical master-slave manipulator: an instrument improving the performance in standardized tasks for endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Diks; J E N Jaspers; W Wisselink; B A M J de Mol; C A Grimbergen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Thoracoscopic robot-assisted bronchoplasty.

Authors:  N Ishikawa; Y S Sun; L W Nifong; W R Chitwood; M Oda; Y Ohta; G Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Carsten N Gutt; Vasile V Bintintan; Jörg Köninger; Beat P Müller-Stich; Michael Reiter; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive vs. thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting.

Authors:  Florian Augustin; Johannes Bodner; Herbert Maier; Christoph Schwinghammer; Burkhard Pichler; Paolo Lucciarini; Johann Pratschke; Thomas Schmid
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  State of the art of robotic thymectomy.

Authors:  Mahmoud Ismail; Marc Swierzy; Jens C Rückert
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  [Minimally invasive thymus surgery].

Authors:  J C Rückert; M Ismail; M Swierzy; C Braumann; H Badakhshi; P Rogalla; A Meisel; R I Rückert; J M Müller
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.