Literature DB >> 22044981

Comparison of complications after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Ju-Hee Lee1, Do Joong Park, Hyung-Ho Kim, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Han-Kwang Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The complication rate after surgery for gastric cancer varies according to the particular definition of morbidity. Complications after gastrectomy should be reported using a standardized method. The present study retrospectively analyzed patient outcomes after open distal gastrectomy (ODG) and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer using a standardized classification system of the severity of complications (the Clavien-Dindo system).
METHODS: A total of 1,631 patients who underwent curative ODG or LADG for gastric adenocarcinoma between May 2003 and December 2009 were included in the study and any risk factors related to complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Six hundred twenty-nine patients were treated with ODG and 1,002 with LADG. Postoperative complications were less frequent in the LADG group than in the ODG group (25.3% vs. 40.1%, P < 0.001), and fewer major complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥IIIa) were observed with LADG than with ODG (2.1% vs. 5.4%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the laparoscopic surgical approach correlated with significantly fewer overall and major complications in patients with stage I disease.
CONCLUSION: Using the Clavien-Dindo system, we observed fewer complications with LADG than with ODG. This shows that the laparoscopic approach for treating gastric cancer is less invasive than the open approach in terms of morbidity. Future studies will be needed to confirm this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22044981     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2027-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Application of a novel severity grading system for surgical complications after colorectal resection.

Authors:  Haggi Mazeh; Yacov Samet; Bassam Abu-Wasel; Nahum Beglaibter; Ronit Grinbaum; Tzeela Cohen; Meir Pinto; Tamar Hamburger; Herbert R Freund; Aviram Nissan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Norio Shiraishi; Kyuzo Fujii; Kazuhiro Yasuda; Masafumi Inomata; Yosuke Adachi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Norio Shiraishi; Ichiro Uyama; Kenichi Sugihara; Nobuhiko Tanigawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Liver blood flow changes during laparoscopic surgery in pigs. A study of hepatic indocyanine green removal.

Authors:  M J Tuñón; P González; F Jorquera; A Llorente; M Gonzalo-Orden; J González-Gallego
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Surgical complications and the risk factors of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Keun Won Ryu; Young-Woo Kim; Jun Ho Lee; Byung-Ho Nam; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Il Ju Choi; Jae-Moon Bae
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Three-quarters of right liver donors experienced postoperative complications.

Authors:  Nam-Joon Yi; Kyung-Suk Suh; Jai Young Cho; Hae Won Lee; Eung-Ho Cho; Sung Hoon Yang; Yong Beom Cho; Kuhn Uk Lee
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Liver enzyme alterations after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H Erhan Guven; Suleyman Oral
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.008

10.  Predictive factors for surgical complications of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Hirochika Makino; Ryo Takagawa; Kei Sato; Mayumi Kawamata; Amane Kanazawa; Naoto Yamamoto; Yasuhiko Nagano; Shoichi Fujii; Hidetaka A Ono; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  54 in total

1.  Definition and classification of complications of gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on the accordion severity grading system.

Authors:  Mi Ran Jung; Young Kyu Park; Jang Won Seon; Kwang Yong Kim; Oh Cheong; Seong Yeob Ryu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  A comparison of surgical procedures and postoperative cares for minimally invasive laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Na Tang; Jun-Hong Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

3.  Clavien-Dindo classification and risk factors of gastrectomy-related complications: an analysis of 1049 patients.

Authors:  Hua Xiao; Pingli Xie; Kunyan Zhou; Xiaoxin Qiu; Yuan Hong; Jingshi Liu; Yongzhong Ouyang; Tang Ming; Hailong Xie; Xiaohong Wang; Haizhen Zhu; Man Xia; Chaohui Zuo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

4.  Eleven-year experience with 3000 cases of laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery in a single institution: analysis of postoperative morbidities and long-term oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Young Suk Park; Sang-Yong Son; Aung Myint Oo; Do Hyun Jung; Dong Joon Shin; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparison of the long-term results of patients who underwent laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jun Ho Lee; Byung-Ho Nam; Keun Won Ryu; Seong Yeop Ryu; Young Woo Kim; Young Kyu Park; Sung Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study.

Authors:  Ichiro Uyama; Koichi Suda; Masaya Nakauchi; Takahiro Kinoshita; Hirokazu Noshiro; Shuji Takiguchi; Kazuhisa Ehara; Kazutaka Obama; Shiro Kuwabara; Hiroshi Okabe; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Evaluation of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results of a comparison with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jian-Xian Lin; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Lu Jun; Qi-Yue Chen; Mi Lin; Ruhong Tu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Evaluation of Clavien-Dindo classification in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Junfeng Zhou; Peiwu Yu; Yan Shi; Bo Tang; Yingxue Hao; Yongliang Zhao; Feng Qian
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients with body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or more.

Authors:  Sang-Yong Son; Do-Hyun Jung; Chang Min Lee; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Hye Seong Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Postoperative intra-abdominal complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification following open and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Junya Kondo; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.