Literature DB >> 19317996

Application of a novel severity grading system for surgical complications after colorectal resection.

Haggi Mazeh1, Yacov Samet, Bassam Abu-Wasel, Nahum Beglaibter, Ronit Grinbaum, Tzeela Cohen, Meir Pinto, Tamar Hamburger, Herbert R Freund, Aviram Nissan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uniform and accurate reporting of surgical complications is the basis for quality control. We developed a computerized system for reporting and grading surgical complications in colorectal surgery. This study was conducted to evaluate this computerized reporting system. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all surgical complications in patients who underwent resection of the colon or rectum at our institution between the years 1999 and 2004 (n = 408). All complications were recorded using the computerized reporting system and compared with complications reported in the literature.
RESULTS: Elective operations were performed in 75.7% of patients, and 24.3% required emergency operations. Of the 408 patients in the study, 239 (58.6%) had an uneventful recovery without complications. At least 1 complication was recorded in 169 (41.4%) patients. Grades 1 and 2 complications were recorded in 83 (20.3%) and 105 (25.7%) patients, respectively, requiring observation or medical treatment only, and 59 patients (14.5%) had grades 3 to 5 complications. The three leading complications were surgical site infection, intraabdominal abscess, and hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion. The grades 3 to 5 complication rate was within the range described in the literature, and the rate of grades 1 and 2 complications was substantially higher. These grades 1 and 2 complications were associated with a substantially longer hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: This novel complication reporting system was found feasible and proved to have a higher sensitivity for recording minor but meaningful complications that tend to prolong hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19317996     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  15 in total

1.  Splanchnic vasoregulation after major abdominal surgery in pigs.

Authors:  Lukas E Brügger; Guido Beldi; Mario Beck; Francesca Porta; Hendrik Bracht; Daniel Candinas; Jukka Takala; Stephan M Jakob
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Evaluation of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results of a comparison with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jian-Xian Lin; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Lu Jun; Qi-Yue Chen; Mi Lin; Ruhong Tu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluation of Clavien-Dindo classification in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Junfeng Zhou; Peiwu Yu; Yan Shi; Bo Tang; Yingxue Hao; Yongliang Zhao; Feng Qian
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients older than 60 years.

Authors:  Ido Mizrahi; Abbas Alkurd; Muhammad Ghanem; Diaa Zugayar; Haggi Mazeh; Ahmed Eid; Nahum Beglaibter; Ronit Grinbaum
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Comparison of complications after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Authors:  Ju-Hee Lee; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Role of antibiotic therapy in mild acute calculus cholecystitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Haggi Mazeh; Ido Mizrahi; Uri Dior; Natalia Simanovsky; Mervyn Shapiro; Herbert R Freund; Ahmed Eid
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis: Is it Time for a Change?

Authors:  Jonathan B Yuval; Ido Mizrahi; Haggi Mazeh; Daniel J Weiss; Gidon Almogy; Miklosh Bala; Eran Kuchuk; Baha Siam; Natalia Simanovsky; Ahmed Eid; Alon J Pikarsky
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Grading of complications and risk factor evaluation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Ziv Asa; Ron Greenberg; Ronen Ghinea; Roy Inbar; Nir Wasserberg; Shmuel Avital
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Routine evaluation of the distal colon remnant before Hartmann's reversal is not necessary in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Nikiforos Ballian; Barbara Zarebczan; Alejandro Munoz; Bruce Harms; Charles P Heise; Eugene F Foley; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Quantitative assessment of mesorectal fat: new prognostic biomarker in patients with mid-to-lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jiyoung Yoon; Yong Eun Chung; Joon Seok Lim; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.