Wael AlJaroudi1, Wael A Jaber, Manuel D Cerqueira. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. aljarow@ccf.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the effect of tracer dose on the reproducibility and accuracy of left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony indices by phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured LV dyssynchrony in 54 patients with normal LV ejection and perfusion (group 1) and 54 age and gender matched patients with LV ejection <35% (group 2) using phase analysis of gated SPECT MPI from stress (high dose) and rest (low dose) studies with 2 software programs: Corridor4DM (4DM) and Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb). Although the correlation between rest- and stress-derived standard deviation was good (R = 0.76, P < .0001, with both software programs), there was considerable variability between the measurements (P < .0001 by paired t test). In addition, the rest standard deviation was significantly higher than stress in group 1 (10.2° ± 4.6° vs 6.1° ± 2.5°, and 12.2° ± 6.4° vs 7.9° ± 4.6°, with 4DM and ECTb, respectively, P < .0001 for both) and group 2 patients (44.0° ± 18.0° vs 35.9° ± 21.0° and 47.3° ± 19.2° vs 38.8° ± 19.8°, with 4DM and ECTb, P = .03 and .02, respectively). Similarly, the rest standard deviations were higher than the stress values irrespective of the type of stress test (i.e., exercise vs pharmacological), and the body mass index. Finally, using rest-derived dyssynchrony indices was associated with 9%-13% and 22%-26% false positive rate of significant mechanical dyssynchrony using different cut-off values for groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: LV mechanical dyssynchrony indices by phase analysis have more variation and are significantly higher if derived from rest gated SPECT images obtained with low-dose tracer.
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the effect of tracer dose on the reproducibility and accuracy of left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony indices by phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured LV dyssynchrony in 54 patients with normal LV ejection and perfusion (group 1) and 54 age and gender matched patients with LV ejection <35% (group 2) using phase analysis of gated SPECT MPI from stress (high dose) and rest (low dose) studies with 2 software programs: Corridor4DM (4DM) and Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb). Although the correlation between rest- and stress-derived standard deviation was good (R = 0.76, P < .0001, with both software programs), there was considerable variability between the measurements (P < .0001 by paired t test). In addition, the rest standard deviation was significantly higher than stress in group 1 (10.2° ± 4.6° vs 6.1° ± 2.5°, and 12.2° ± 6.4° vs 7.9° ± 4.6°, with 4DM and ECTb, respectively, P < .0001 for both) and group 2 patients (44.0° ± 18.0° vs 35.9° ± 21.0° and 47.3° ± 19.2° vs 38.8° ± 19.8°, with 4DM and ECTb, P = .03 and .02, respectively). Similarly, the rest standard deviations were higher than the stress values irrespective of the type of stress test (i.e., exercise vs pharmacological), and the body mass index. Finally, using rest-derived dyssynchrony indices was associated with 9%-13% and 22%-26% false positive rate of significant mechanical dyssynchrony using different cut-off values for groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: LV mechanical dyssynchrony indices by phase analysis have more variation and are significantly higher if derived from rest gated SPECT images obtained with low-dose tracer.
Authors: Wael AlJaroudi; Wael A Jaber; Richard A Grimm; Thomas Marwick; Manuel D Cerqueira Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Ji Chen; Ernest V Garcia; Jeroen J Bax; Ami E Iskandrian; Salvador Borges-Neto; Prem Soman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Aju P Pazhenkottil; Ronny R Buechel; Lars Husmann; René N Nkoulou; Mathias Wolfrum; Jelena-Rima Ghadri; Janine Kummer; Bernhard A Herzog; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Heart Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Zainab Samad; Allen E Atchley; Mark A Trimble; Jie-Lena Sun; Linda K Shaw; Robert Pagnanelli; Ji Chen; Ernest V Garcia; Ami E Iskandrian; Eric J Velazquez; Salvador Borges-Neto Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Mati Friehling; Ji Chen; Samir Saba; Raveen Bazaz; David Schwartzman; Evan C Adelstein; Ernest Garcia; William Follansbee; Prem Soman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Mark A Trimble; Salvador Borges-Neto; Emily F Honeycutt; Linda K Shaw; Robert Pagnanelli; Ji Chen; Ami E Iskandrian; Ernest V Garcia; Eric J Velazquez Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Mark A Trimble; Salvador Borges-Neto; Stuart Smallheiser; Ji Chen; Emily F Honeycutt; Linda K Shaw; Jaekyeong Heo; Robert A Pagnanelli; E Lindsey Tauxe; Ernest V Garcia; Fabio Esteves; Frank Seghatol-Eslami; G Neal Kay; Ami E Iskandrian Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007-04-18 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Wael AlJaroudi; Wael A Jaber; Richard A Grimm; Thomas Marwick; Manuel D Cerqueira Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Wael AlJaroudi; M Chadi Alraies; Frank DiFilippo; Richard C Brunken; Manuel D Cerqueira; Wael A Jaber Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-01-05 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Christopher Uebleis; Stefan Hellweger; Rüdiger Paul Laubender; Alexander Becker; Hae-Young Sohn; Sebastian Lehner; Alexander Haug; Peter Bartenstein; Paul Cumming; Serge D Van Kriekinge; Piotr J Slomka; Marcus Hacker Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Vladimir V Shipulin; Sergey L Andreev; Andrew S Pryakhin; Andrew V Mochula; Alina N Maltseva; Svetlana I Sazonova; Vladimir M Shipulin; Samia Massalha; Konstantin V Zavadovsky Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Adam S Goldberg; M Chadi Alraies; Manuel D Cerqueira; Wael A Jaber; Wael A Aljaroudi Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 5.952