Literature DB >> 23054841

Paradoxical septal motion from prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery does not impact left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by gated myocardial perfusion imaging.

Wael Aljaroudi1, M Chadi Alraies, Richard Brunken, Manuel Cerquiera, Wael A Jaber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) provides automated and reproducible assessment of left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) (phase standard deviation [SD]). Many patients undergoing gated MPI have history of prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). The latter is often associated with paradoxical septal wall motion (PSM). The effect of prior CABG and PSM on LVMD has not been evaluated. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From the single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) MPI clinical database maintained at the Cleveland Clinic, we identified 200 consecutive patients with SPECT (100 control with normal LV ejection fraction [EF], MPI, and QRS < 120 ms; and 100 with LVEF < 35%), and 631 patients with LVEF < 35% with gated PET. Patients with QRS ≥ 120 ms, bundle branch block, ventricular pacing or isolated non-CABG surgery were excluded. There were 162 patients with gated SPECT (46 with prior CABG), and 568 with gated PET (220 with prior CABG) that were left for analysis. Phase SD was derived using Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb) (for gated SPECT) and Corridor 4DM (4DM) (for gated SPECT and PET images). Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to assess whether prior CABG was an independent predictor of worse LV mechanical dyssynchrony. After adjusting for patients' demographics, co-morbidities, medications, and MPI data, history of prior CABG was not and independent predictor of LV mechanical dyssynchrony (P = .67 with 4DM, P = .97 with ECTb) in patients undergoing gated SPECT or among patients undergoing gated PET imaging (P = .18).
CONCLUSIONS: Although paradoxical septal wall motion is commonly seen after cardiac surgery, prior CABG does not affect or impact LV mechanical dyssynchrony indices measured from gated SPECT or PET images. Whether dyssynchrony measurements with echocardiography that has higher temporal resolution might uncover intraventricular delays, remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054841     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-012-9627-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  34 in total

1.  Alternative methods for the assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Wael A Jaber; Richard A Grimm; Thomas Marwick; Manuel D Cerqueira
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Longitudinal strain delay index by speckle tracking imaging: a new marker of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Pascal Lim; Adisai Buakhamsri; Zoran B Popovic; Neil L Greenberg; Dimpi Patel; James D Thomas; Richard A Grimm
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Is nuclear imaging a viable alternative technique to assess dyssynchrony?

Authors:  Ji Chen; Jeroen J Bax; Maureen M Henneman; Mark J Boogers; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Repeatability of left ventricular dyssynchrony and function parameters in serial gated myocardial perfusion SPECT studies.

Authors:  Xianhe Lin; Huiqin Xu; Xuefeng Zhao; Russell D Folks; Ernest V Garcia; Prem Soman; Ji Chen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for the assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Ji Chen; Ernest V Garcia; Jeroen J Bax; Ami E Iskandrian; Salvador Borges-Neto; Prem Soman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Long-term prognostic value of left ventricular dyssynchrony assessment by phase analysis from myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Aju P Pazhenkottil; Ronny R Buechel; Lars Husmann; René N Nkoulou; Mathias Wolfrum; Jelena-Rima Ghadri; Janine Kummer; Bernhard A Herzog; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  A prospective pilot study to evaluate the relationship between acute change in left ventricular synchrony after cardiac resynchronization therapy and patient outcome using a single-injection gated SPECT protocol.

Authors:  Mati Friehling; Ji Chen; Samir Saba; Raveen Bazaz; David Schwartzman; Evan C Adelstein; Ernest Garcia; William Follansbee; Prem Soman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Evaluation of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony as determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and conduction disturbances.

Authors:  Mark A Trimble; Salvador Borges-Neto; Stuart Smallheiser; Ji Chen; Emily F Honeycutt; Linda K Shaw; Jaekyeong Heo; Robert A Pagnanelli; E Lindsey Tauxe; Ernest V Garcia; Fabio Esteves; Frank Seghatol-Eslami; G Neal Kay; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Novel speckle-tracking radial strain from routine black-and-white echocardiographic images to quantify dyssynchrony and predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Matthew S Suffoletto; Kaoru Dohi; Maxime Cannesson; Samir Saba; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography compared with tissue Doppler imaging for the assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Maureen M Henneman; Ji Chen; Claudia Ypenburg; Petra Dibbets; Gabe B Bleeker; Eric Boersma; Marcel P Stokkel; Ernst E van der Wall; Ernest V Garcia; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  5 in total

1.  Predictive values of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony for CRT response in heart failure patients with different pathophysiology.

Authors:  Zhuo He; Dianfu Li; Chang Cui; Hui-Yuan Qin; Zhongqiang Zhao; Xiaofeng Hou; Jiangang Zou; Ming-Long Chen; Cheng Wang; Weihua Zhou
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  Prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with ejection fraction 35-50% and QRS < 150 ms.

Authors:  Adam S Goldberg; M Chadi Alraies; Manuel D Cerqueira; Wael A Jaber; Wael A Aljaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Myocardial ischemia and previous infarction contribute to left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Hanna Hämäläinen; Alisa Corovai; Jussi Laitinen; Tiina M Laitinen; Marja Hedman; Antti Hedman; Antti Kivelä; Tomi P Laitinen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Phase analysis of gated PET in the evaluation of mechanical ventricular synchrony: A narrative overview.

Authors:  Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco; Andrea Monroy-Gonzalez; Niek H J Prakken; Walter Noordzij; Juhani Knuuti; Robert A deKemp; Riemer H J A Slart
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  The assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony from gated 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT and gated 18F-FDG PET by QGS: a comparative study.

Authors:  Sebastian Lehner; Frank Philipp Graner; Maximilian Fischer; Harun Ilhan; Peter Bartenstein; Andrei Todica
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.872

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.