BACKGROUND: In the mid to late 1990 s, to sterilize UHMWPE bearings, manufacturers changed from gamma-irradiation-in-air (gamma-air) sterilization, which initiated oxidation leading to bearing fatigue, to gamma-irradiation sterilization in an inert environment (gamma-inert). The change to gamma-inert sterilization reportedly prevented shelf oxidation before implantation but not in vivo oxidation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Has the change to gamma-inert sterilization prevented shelf oxidation that led to early in vivo fatigue damage in gamma-air-sterilized tibial inserts? And (2) has the change to gamma-inert sterilization prevented the occurrence of fatigue secondary to in vivo oxidation? METHODS: We rated 183 retrieved gamma-air- and 175 retrieved gamma-inert-sterilized tibial inserts for clinical fatigue damage and analyzed 132 gamma-air- and 174 gamma-inert-sterilized tibial inserts for oxidation by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. RESULTS: Oxidation led to decreased mechanical properties in shelf-aged gamma-air-sterilized tibial inserts. Barrier packaging prevented shelf oxidation in gamma-inert-sterilized tibial inserts. Gamma-air- and gamma-inert-sterilized inserts oxidized in vivo. Fatigue damage (delamination) occurred more frequently in inserts retrieved after longer time in vivo. Longer in vivo time correlated with higher oxidation and more accumulated cycles of use. CONCLUSIONS: Published oxidation projections suggest gamma-inert-sterilized tibial inserts would reach the critical oxidation for the onset of fatigue after 11 to 14 years in vivo. These retrievals appear to follow the projected oxidation trends. Frequency of fatigue damage increased with increasing oxidation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fatigue of tibial inserts becomes more likely, especially in active patients, after more than a decade of good clinical performance.
BACKGROUND: In the mid to late 1990 s, to sterilize UHMWPE bearings, manufacturers changed from gamma-irradiation-in-air (gamma-air) sterilization, which initiated oxidation leading to bearing fatigue, to gamma-irradiation sterilization in an inert environment (gamma-inert). The change to gamma-inert sterilization reportedly prevented shelf oxidation before implantation but not in vivo oxidation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Has the change to gamma-inert sterilization prevented shelf oxidation that led to early in vivo fatigue damage in gamma-air-sterilized tibial inserts? And (2) has the change to gamma-inert sterilization prevented the occurrence of fatigue secondary to in vivo oxidation? METHODS: We rated 183 retrieved gamma-air- and 175 retrieved gamma-inert-sterilized tibial inserts for clinical fatigue damage and analyzed 132 gamma-air- and 174 gamma-inert-sterilized tibial inserts for oxidation by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. RESULTS: Oxidation led to decreased mechanical properties in shelf-aged gamma-air-sterilized tibial inserts. Barrier packaging prevented shelf oxidation in gamma-inert-sterilized tibial inserts. Gamma-air- and gamma-inert-sterilized inserts oxidized in vivo. Fatigue damage (delamination) occurred more frequently in inserts retrieved after longer time in vivo. Longer in vivo time correlated with higher oxidation and more accumulated cycles of use. CONCLUSIONS: Published oxidation projections suggest gamma-inert-sterilized tibial inserts would reach the critical oxidation for the onset of fatigue after 11 to 14 years in vivo. These retrievals appear to follow the projected oxidation trends. Frequency of fatigue damage increased with increasing oxidation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fatigue of tibial inserts becomes more likely, especially in active patients, after more than a decade of good clinical performance.
Authors: Francisco J Medel; Steven M Kurtz; William J Hozack; Javad Parvizi; James J Purtill; Peter F Sharkey; Daniel MacDonald; Matthew J Kraay; Victor Goldberg; Clare M Rimnac Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Merrill A Ritter; Kenneth E Davis; John B Meding; Jeffery L Pierson; Michael E Berend; Robert A Malinzak Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Barbara H Currier; John H Currier; Michael B Mayor; Kimberly A Lyford; John P Collier; Douglas W Van Citters Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Barbara H Currier; John H Currier; Michael B Mayor; Kimberly A Lyford; Douglas W Van Citters; John P Collier Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2007-03-28 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Luigi Costa; Pierangiola Bracco; Elena Maria Brach del Prever; Steven M Kurtz; Paolo Gallinaro Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Meghana R K Helder; Ryan S Hennessy; Daniel B Spoon; Brandon J Tefft; Tyra A Witt; Ronald J Marler; Sorin V Pislaru; Robert D Simari; John M Stulak; Amir Lerman Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Steven M Kurtz; Daniel W MacDonald; Sevi Kocagöz; Mariya Tohfafarosh; Doruk Baykal Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Samuel T Kunkel; Wayne E Moschetti; Paul Werth; Yale Fillingham; David Jevsevar; Douglas VanCitters; John Currier; Barbara Currier; Eric Henderson Journal: Arthroplast Today Date: 2021-04-16