BACKGROUND: To describe the intra and interobserver agreement in the evaluation of fundus autofluorescence patterns in geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients with geographic atrophy and fundus autofluorescence images of a minimum acceptable quality for grading were included. Four observers with experience in the evaluation of autofluorescence images independently classified the randomly presented series of images on two occasions, at least 1 month apart from each other (intraobserver analysis). The second determination of each observer was used for evaluation of interobserver agreement. The kappa statistic and 95% confidence intervals, together with percentages of agreement, were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: The final sample included 69 eyes of 49 patients. Intraobserver agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect (kappa between 0.51 and 0.83), while interobserver results ranged from poor to substantial (corresponding to kappa between 0.30 and 0.62). The use of more simple classifications improved reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: Although intraobserver reproducibility was high, interobserver agreement was variable. Clear descriptions and a uniform set of criteria to classify these patients are needed if fundus autofluorescence imaging is used to evaluate patients with geographic atrophy.
BACKGROUND: To describe the intra and interobserver agreement in the evaluation of fundus autofluorescence patterns in geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients with geographic atrophy and fundus autofluorescence images of a minimum acceptable quality for grading were included. Four observers with experience in the evaluation of autofluorescence images independently classified the randomly presented series of images on two occasions, at least 1 month apart from each other (intraobserver analysis). The second determination of each observer was used for evaluation of interobserver agreement. The kappa statistic and 95% confidence intervals, together with percentages of agreement, were used to analyze the results. RESULTS: The final sample included 69 eyes of 49patients. Intraobserver agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect (kappa between 0.51 and 0.83), while interobserver results ranged from poor to substantial (corresponding to kappa between 0.30 and 0.62). The use of more simple classifications improved reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: Although intraobserver reproducibility was high, interobserver agreement was variable. Clear descriptions and a uniform set of criteria to classify these patients are needed if fundus autofluorescence imaging is used to evaluate patients with geographic atrophy.
Authors: Janet S Sunness; Eyal Margalit; Divya Srikumaran; Carol A Applegate; Yan Tian; Daniel Perry; Barbara S Hawkins; Neil M Bressler Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Monika Fleckenstein; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Christine Adrion; Sivatharisini Visvalingam; Arno P Göbel; Andreas Mössner; Claudia N von Strachwitz; Friederike Mackensen; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Sebastian Wolf; Ulrich Mansmann; Frank G Holz Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kenneth J Nichols; Andrew Van Tosh; Yi Wang; Tracy L Faber; Christopher J Palestro; Nathaniel Reichek Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-11-26 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Albert P Lin; L Jay Katz; George L Spaeth; Marlene R Moster; Jeffrey D Henderer; Courtland M Schmidt; Jonathan S Myers Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-10-17 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Emma C Zanzottera; Jeffrey D Messinger; Thomas Ach; R Theodore Smith; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Emma C Zanzottera; Thomas Ach; Carrie Huisingh; Jeffrey D Messinger; Richard F Spaide; Christine A Curcio Journal: Retina Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Michael J Allingham; Qing Nie; Eleonora M Lad; Daniel J Izatt; Priyatham S Mettu; Scott W Cousins; Sina Farsiu Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 4.799