Y J Jeong1, I H Hong1, J K Chung1, K L Kim1, H K Kim1, S P Park2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. 2. 1] Department of Ophthalmology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea [2] Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We examined the association between abnormal fundus autofluorescence (FAF) features on images obtained by a modified fundus camera (mFC) and geographic atrophy (GA) progression in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Serial FAF images of 131 eyes from 131 patients with GA were included in the study. All FAF images were obtained with an mFC (excitation, ∼ 500-610 nm; emission, ∼ 675-715 nm). The GA area was quantified at baseline and 1 year later using a customized segmentation program. The yearly GA enlargement rate was then calculated. Abnormal FAF patterns in the junctional zone of GA were classified as None or Minimal change, Focal, Patchy, Banded, or Diffuse according to previously published classification based on confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO). The relationship between GA enlargement and abnormal FAF was evaluated. RESULTS: The mean rate of GA enlargement was the fastest in eyes with Diffuse pattern (1.74 mm(2) per year), followed by eyes with the Banded pattern (1.69 mm(2) per year). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that eyes with the Banded and Diffuse pattern had significantly higher risk for GA enlargement compared with eyes with the other patterns. CONCLUSIONS: FAF image obtained by mFC appears to be acceptable for evaluating GA in accordance with an established cSLO-based classification. Eyes with the Banded or the Diffuse patterns of abnormal FAF at baseline indicate a high risk for GA progression. Identifying patients at high risk for GA progression using an mFC is broadly available method that can provide additional information to help predict disease course.
PURPOSE: We examined the association between abnormal fundus autofluorescence (FAF) features on images obtained by a modified fundus camera (mFC) and geographic atrophy (GA) progression in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Serial FAF images of 131 eyes from 131 patients with GA were included in the study. All FAF images were obtained with an mFC (excitation, ∼ 500-610 nm; emission, ∼ 675-715 nm). The GA area was quantified at baseline and 1 year later using a customized segmentation program. The yearly GA enlargement rate was then calculated. Abnormal FAF patterns in the junctional zone of GA were classified as None or Minimal change, Focal, Patchy, Banded, or Diffuse according to previously published classification based on confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO). The relationship between GA enlargement and abnormal FAF was evaluated. RESULTS: The mean rate of GA enlargement was the fastest in eyes with Diffuse pattern (1.74 mm(2) per year), followed by eyes with the Banded pattern (1.69 mm(2) per year). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that eyes with the Banded and Diffuse pattern had significantly higher risk for GA enlargement compared with eyes with the other patterns. CONCLUSIONS: FAF image obtained by mFC appears to be acceptable for evaluating GA in accordance with an established cSLO-based classification. Eyes with the Banded or the Diffuse patterns of abnormal FAF at baseline indicate a high risk for GA progression. Identifying patients at high risk for GA progression using an mFC is broadly available method that can provide additional information to help predict disease course.
Authors: Redmer van Leeuwen; Caroline C W Klaver; Johannes R Vingerling; Albert Hofman; Paulus T V M de Jong Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2003 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: F G Holz; F Schütt; J Kopitz; G E Eldred; F E Kruse; H E Völcker; M Cantz Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: F G Holz; C Bellmann; M Margaritidis; F Schütt; T P Otto; H E Völcker Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: David S Boyer; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; Menno van Lookeren Campagne; Erin C Henry; Christopher Brittain Journal: Retina Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Thomas J Heesterbeek; Laura Lorés-Motta; Carel B Hoyng; Yara T E Lechanteur; Anneke I den Hollander Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Michael J Allingham; Qing Nie; Eleonora M Lad; Daniel J Izatt; Priyatham S Mettu; Scott W Cousins; Sina Farsiu Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 4.799