OBJECTIVE: To characterize variability in the identification of the macular center among retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) experts. METHODS: A printed set of 25 wide-angle retinal images was compiled from infants at risk for ROP using a commercially available camera. Ten recognized ROP experts were asked to mark the macular center on each image. For each image, we measured the distance from the optic disc center to the marked macular center. Distances were standardized by normalizing the horizontal optic disc diameter in each image to 0.93 mm. In images with visible peripheral disease, interexpert agreement on the presence of zone I disease was also determined. RESULTS: For the image with the least variability among experts, mean (SD) distance from the optic disc to the macular center was 3.69 (0.21) mm (range, 3.13-3.81 mm). For the image with the greatest variability among experts, distance from the optic disc to the macular center was 4.32 (1.19) mm (range, 3.21-7.19 mm). In 7 of 21 images (33%) with visible peripheral disease, there would have been disagreement among experts in the diagnosis of zone I disease based on identification of the macular center. Among the 10 experts, in 17 of 25 images (68%), 1 expert identified the distance between the optic disc and macular center to be greater than 1 SD from the mean. CONCLUSION: Significant variability exists among experts in identification of the macular center from wide-angle images, which raises concerns about the reliability of zone I ROP diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize variability in the identification of the macular center among retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) experts. METHODS: A printed set of 25 wide-angle retinal images was compiled from infants at risk for ROP using a commercially available camera. Ten recognized ROP experts were asked to mark the macular center on each image. For each image, we measured the distance from the optic disc center to the marked macular center. Distances were standardized by normalizing the horizontal optic disc diameter in each image to 0.93 mm. In images with visible peripheral disease, interexpert agreement on the presence of zone I disease was also determined. RESULTS: For the image with the least variability among experts, mean (SD) distance from the optic disc to the macular center was 3.69 (0.21) mm (range, 3.13-3.81 mm). For the image with the greatest variability among experts, distance from the optic disc to the macular center was 4.32 (1.19) mm (range, 3.21-7.19 mm). In 7 of 21 images (33%) with visible peripheral disease, there would have been disagreement among experts in the diagnosis of zone I disease based on identification of the macular center. Among the 10 experts, in 17 of 25 images (68%), 1 expert identified the distance between the optic disc and macular center to be greater than 1 SD from the mean. CONCLUSION: Significant variability exists among experts in identification of the macular center from wide-angle images, which raises concerns about the reliability of zone I ROP diagnosis.
Authors: Michael F Chiang; Michele Melia; Angela N Buffenn; Scott R Lambert; Franco M Recchia; Jennifer L Simpson; Michael B Yang Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Hilal Biten; Travis K Redd; Chace Moleta; J Peter Campbell; Susan Ostmo; Karyn Jonas; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Samir N Patel; Michael A Klufas; Michael C Ryan; Karyn E Jonas; Susan Ostmo; Maria Ana Martinez-Castellanos; Audina M Berrocal; Michael F Chiang; R V Paul Chan Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: J Peter Campbell; Ryan Swan; Karyn Jonas; Susan Ostmo; Camila V Ventura; Maria A Martinez-Castellanos; Rachelle Go Ang Sam Anzures; Michael F Chiang; R V Paul Chan Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2015-11-05
Authors: Ebenezer Daniel; Graham E Quinn; P Lloyd Hildebrand; Anna Ells; G Baker Hubbard; Antonio Capone; E Revell Martin; Candace P Ostroff; Eli Smith; Maxwell Pistilli; Gui-Shuang Ying Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: J Peter Campbell; Michael C Ryan; Emily Lore; Peng Tian; Susan Ostmo; Karyn Jonas; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: J Peter Campbell; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Deniz Erdogmus; Peng Tian; Dharanish Kedarisetti; Chace Moleta; James D Reynolds; Kelly Hutcheson; Michael J Shapiro; Michael X Repka; Philip Ferrone; Kimberly Drenser; Jason Horowitz; Kemal Sonmez; Ryan Swan; Susan Ostmo; Karyn E Jonas; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Michael A Klufas; Samir N Patel; Michael C Ryan; Mrinali Patel Gupta; Karyn E Jonas; Susan Ostmo; Maria Ana Martinez-Castellanos; Audina M Berrocal; Michael F Chiang; R V Paul Chan Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 12.079