Emma C Zanzottera1, Thomas Ach, Carrie Huisingh, Jeffrey D Messinger, Richard F Spaide, Christine A Curcio. 1. *Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama; †Eye Clinic, Department of Clinical Science "Luigi Sacco," Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; ‡Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; §Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; and ¶Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To inform the interpretation of clinical optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence imaging in geographic atrophy (GA) of age-related macular degeneration by determining the distribution of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) phenotypes in the transition from health to atrophy in donor eyes. METHODS: In RPE-Bruch membrane flat mounts of two GA eyes, the terminations of organized RPE cytoskeleton and autofluorescent material were compared. In high-resolution histological sections of 13 GA eyes, RPE phenotypes were assessed at ±500 and ±100 μm from the descent of the external limiting membrane (ELM) toward Bruch membrane. The ELM descent was defined as curved, reflected, or oblique in shape. Thicknesses of RPE, basal laminar deposit (BLamD), and RPE plus BLamD were measured. RESULTS: A border of atrophy that can be precisely delimited is the ELM descent, as opposed to the termination of the RPE layer itself, because of dissociated RPE in the atrophic area. Approaching the ELM descent, the percentage of abnormal RPE morphologies increases, the percentage of age-normal cells decreases, overall RPE thickens, and BLamD does not thin. The combination of RPE plus BLamD is 19.7% thicker at -100 μm from the ELM descent than that at -500 μm (23.1 ± 10.7 μm vs. 19.3 ± 8.2 μm; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The distribution of RPE phenotypes at the GA transition supports the idea that these morphologies represent defined stages of a degeneration sequence. The idea that RPE dysmorphia including rounding and stacking helps explain variable autofluorescence patterns in GA is supported. The ELM descent and RPE plus BLamD thickness profile may have utility as spectral domain optical coherence tomography metrics in clinical trials.
PURPOSE: To inform the interpretation of clinical optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence imaging in geographic atrophy (GA) of age-related macular degeneration by determining the distribution of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) phenotypes in the transition from health to atrophy in donor eyes. METHODS: In RPE-Bruch membrane flat mounts of two GA eyes, the terminations of organized RPE cytoskeleton and autofluorescent material were compared. In high-resolution histological sections of 13 GA eyes, RPE phenotypes were assessed at ±500 and ±100 μm from the descent of the external limiting membrane (ELM) toward Bruch membrane. The ELM descent was defined as curved, reflected, or oblique in shape. Thicknesses of RPE, basal laminar deposit (BLamD), and RPE plus BLamD were measured. RESULTS: A border of atrophy that can be precisely delimited is the ELM descent, as opposed to the termination of the RPE layer itself, because of dissociated RPE in the atrophic area. Approaching the ELM descent, the percentage of abnormal RPE morphologies increases, the percentage of age-normal cells decreases, overall RPE thickens, and BLamD does not thin. The combination of RPE plus BLamD is 19.7% thicker at -100 μm from the ELM descent than that at -500 μm (23.1 ± 10.7 μm vs. 19.3 ± 8.2 μm; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The distribution of RPE phenotypes at the GA transition supports the idea that these morphologies represent defined stages of a degeneration sequence. The idea that RPE dysmorphia including rounding and stacking helps explain variable autofluorescence patterns in GA is supported. The ELM descent and RPE plus BLamD thickness profile may have utility as spectral domain optical coherence tomography metrics in clinical trials.
Authors: François Delori; Jonathan P Greenberg; Russell L Woods; Jörg Fischer; Tobias Duncker; Janet Sparrow; R Theodore Smith Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Athanasios Panorgias; Robert J Zawadzki; Arlie G Capps; Allan A Hunter; Lawrence S Morse; John S Werner Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Patrick Pallitto; Zsolt Ablonczy; E Ellen Jones; Richard R Drake; Yiannis Koutalos; Rosalie K Crouch; John Donello; Julia Herrmann Journal: Photochem Photobiol Sci Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Manpreet Brar; Igor Kozak; Lingyun Cheng; Dirk-Uwe G Bartsch; Ritchie Yuson; Nitin Nigam; Stephen F Oster; Francesca Mojana; William R Freeman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-07-09 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Shalini Jadeja; Alun R Barnard; Lisa McKie; Sally H Cross; Jacqueline K White; Morag Robertson; Peter S Budd; Robert E MacLaren; Ian J Jackson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Pia Stockinger; Andreas Berlin; Daniel Kampik; Christine Schmitt; Jost Hillenkamp; Jeffrey D Messinger; Martina C Herwig-Carl; Thomas Ach Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 1.059
Authors: Emma C Zanzottera; Thomas Ach; Carrie Huisingh; Jeffrey D Messinger; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio Journal: Retina Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Diane L Wang; Julia Agee; Marco Mazzola; Riccardo Sacconi; Giuseppe Querques; Alan D Weinberg; R Theodore Smith Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2019-08-07
Authors: Katharina Bermond; Andreas Berlin; Ioana-Sandra Tarau; Christina Wobbe; Rainer Heintzmann; Christine A Curcio; Kenneth R Sloan; Thomas Ach Journal: Ann Eye Sci Date: 2021-03-15