Literature DB >> 22033134

Effects of phase cancellation and receiver aperture size on broadband ultrasonic attenuation for trabecular bone in vitro.

Jiqi Cheng1, Frederick Serra-Hsu, Yuan Tian, Wei Lin, Yi-Xian Qin.   

Abstract

Phase cancellation in ultrasound due to large receiver size has been proposed as a contributing factor to the inaccuracy of estimating broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), which is used to characterize bone quality. Transducers with aperture size ranging from 2 to 5 mm have been used in previous attempts to study the effect of phase cancellation. However, these receivers themselves are susceptible to phase cancellation because aperture size is close to one center wavelength (about 3 mm at 500 KHz in water). This study uses an ultra small receiver (aperture size: 0.2 mm) in conjunction with a newly developed two-dimensional (2-D) synthetic array system to investigate the effects of phase cancellation and receiver aperture size on BUA estimations of bone tissue. In vitro ultrasound measurements were conducted on 54 trabecular bone samples (harvested from sheep femurs) in a confocal configuration with a focused transmitter and synthesized focused receivers of different aperture sizes. Phase sensitive (PS) and phase insensitive (PI) detections were performed. The results show that phase cancellation does have a significant effect on BUA. The normalized BUA (nBUA) with PS is 8.1% higher than PI nBUA while PI BUA is well correlated with PS BUA. Receiver aperture size also influences the BUA reading for both PI and PS detection and smaller receiver aperture tends to result in higher BUA readings. The results also indicate that the receiver aperture size used in the confocal configuration with PI detection should at least equal the aperture of the transmitter to capture most of the energy redistributed by the interference and diffraction from the trabecular bone.
Copyright © 2011 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22033134      PMCID: PMC3223273          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  33 in total

1.  Ultrasound parametric imaging of the calcaneus: in vivo results with a new device.

Authors:  P Laugier; B Fournier; G Berger
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Prediction of mechanical properties of the human calcaneus by broadband ultrasonic attenuation.

Authors:  C M Langton; C F Njeh; R Hodgskinson; J D Currey
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  The nonlinear transition period of broadband ultrasound attenuation as bone density varies.

Authors:  L Serpe; J Y Rho
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C M Boivin; C M Langton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass?: a two-dimensional histomorphometric study.

Authors:  D Hans; M E Arlot; A M Schott; J P Roux; P O Kotzki; P J Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  The impact of bone size on broadband ultrasound attenuation.

Authors:  C Y Wu; C C Glüer; M Jergas; E Bendavid; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Broadband ultrasonic attenuation: are current measurement techniques inherently inaccurate?

Authors:  G W Petley; P A Robins; J D Aindow
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Factors affecting the in vivo precision of broad-band ultrasonic attenuation.

Authors:  W D Evans; E A Jones; G M Owen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Biomedical ultrasound beam forming.

Authors:  J Y Lu; H Zou; J F Greenleaf
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study.

Authors:  D Hans; P Dargent-Molina; A M Schott; J L Sebert; C Cormier; P O Kotzki; P D Delmas; J M Pouilles; G Breart; P J Meunier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  5 in total

1.  Conventional, Bayesian, and Modified Prony's methods for characterizing fast and slow waves in equine cancellous bone.

Authors:  Amber M Groopman; Jonathan I Katz; Mark R Holland; Fuminori Fujita; Mami Matsukawa; Katsunori Mizuno; Keith A Wear; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Fast and slow wave detection in bovine cancellous bone in vitro using bandlimited deconvolution and Prony's method.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Yoshiki Nagatani; Katsunori Mizuno; Mami Matsukawa
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Estimation of fast and slow wave properties in cancellous bone using Prony's method and curve fitting.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Time-domain separation of interfering waves in cancellous bone using bandlimited deconvolution: simulation and phantom study.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.725

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.