Literature DB >> 8542228

Broadband ultrasonic attenuation: are current measurement techniques inherently inaccurate?

G W Petley1, P A Robins, J D Aindow.   

Abstract

Measurements of broadband ultrasonic attenuation (BUA) are currently made using large aperture, piezoelectric transducers. The use of such a receiver is known to lead to the possibility of an overestimate of ultrasonic attenuation due to phase cancellation and it is shown theoretically that this same effect can also lead to an overestimate of BUA. Using a new scanning approach, BUA was measured using two methods, one sensitive to the phase of the acoustic wave, the other not. The phase sensitive BUA measurements were found to be of significantly higher value (p < 0.0001) than the phase insensitive measurements with a mean difference of 31.2 dB MHz-1. These findings are compatible with the hypothesis that BUA measurement systems with large aperture, piezo-electric receivers are inherently inaccurate.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8542228     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-815-1212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  10 in total

1.  Inverse problems in cancellous bone: estimation of the ultrasonic properties of fast and slow waves using Bayesian probability theory.

Authors:  Christian C Anderson; Adam Q Bauer; Mark R Holland; Michal Pakula; Pascal Laugier; G Larry Bretthorst; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of phase cancellation on estimates of broadband ultrasound attenuation and backscatter coefficient in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  The effect of phase cancellation on estimates of calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation in vivo.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Bone sonometry: reducing phase aberration to improve estimates of broadband ultrasonic attenuation.

Authors:  Adam Q Bauer; Christian C Anderson; Mark R Holland; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Negative dispersion in bone: the role of interference in measurements of the apparent phase velocity of two temporally overlapping signals.

Authors:  Adam Q Bauer; Karen R Marutyan; Mark R Holland; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C M Boivin; C M Langton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Effects of phase cancellation and receiver aperture size on broadband ultrasonic attenuation for trabecular bone in vitro.

Authors:  Jiqi Cheng; Frederick Serra-Hsu; Yuan Tian; Wei Lin; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 8.  Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Relationship between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in young healthy men.

Authors:  J Rawal; K Eleftheriou; J Skipworth; Z Puthucheary; M Loosemore; J Payne; F Dreno; M World; F Haddad; S Humphries; H Montgomery
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  An evaluation of the reproducibility and responsiveness of four 'state-of-the-art' ultrasonic heel bone measurement systems using phantoms.

Authors:  R Strelitzki; J G Truscott
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.071

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.