Literature DB >> 8757153

Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study.

D Hans1, P Dargent-Molina, A M Schott, J L Sebert, C Cormier, P O Kotzki, P D Delmas, J M Pouilles, G Breart, P J Meunier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability of ultrasonographic measurements to discriminate between patients with hip fracture and age-matched controls has until now been tested mainly through cross-sectional studies. We report the results of a prospective study to assess the value of measurements with ultrasound in predicting the risk of hip fracture.
METHODS: 5662 elderly women (mean age 80.4 years) had both baseline calcaneal ultrasonography measurements and femoral radiography (dual-photon X-ray absorptiometry, DPXA) to assess their bone quality. Follow-up every 4 months enabled us to identify incident fractures. 115 hip fractures were recorded during a mean follow-up duration of 2 years.
FINDINGS: Low calcaneal ultrasonographic variables (obtained from measurements of broadband ultrasound attenuation by, and speed of sound through the bone) were able to predict an increased risk of hip fracture, with similar accuracy to low femoral bone mineral density (BMD) obtained by DPXA. The relative risk of hip fracture for 1 SD reduction was 2.0 (95% CI 1.6-2.4) for ultrasound attenuation and 1.7 (1.4-2.1) for speed of sound, compared with 1.9 (1.6-2.4) for BMD. After control for the femoral neck BMD, ultrasonographic variables remained predictive of hip fracture. The incidence of hip fracture among women with values above the median for both calcaneal ultrasound attenuation and femoral neck BMD was 2.7 per 1000 woman-years, compared with 19.6 per 1000 woman-years for those with values below the median for both measures.
INTERPRETATION: Ultrasonographic measurements of the os calcis predict the risk of hip fracture in elderly women living at home as well as DPXA of the hip does, and the combination of both methods makes possible the identification of women at very high or very low risk of fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8757153     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)11456-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  219 in total

1.  A numerical method to predict the effects of frequency-dependent attenuation and dispersion on speed of sound estimates in cancellous bone.

Authors:  K A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  The menopause and its treatment in perspective.

Authors:  F Al-Azzawi
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Screening for osteoporosis. No point until we have resolved issues about long term treatment.

Authors:  I Fogelman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-30

4.  Frequency dependence of ultrasonic backscatter from human trabecular bone: theory and experiment.

Authors:  K A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The increasing use of peripheral bone densitometry.

Authors:  T Masud; R M Francis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-12

6.  Anisotropy of ultrasonic backscatter and attenuation from human calcaneus: implications for relative roles of absorption and scattering in determining attenuation.

Authors:  K A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Fundamental precision limitations for measurements of frequency dependence of backscatter: applications in tissue-mimicking phantoms and trabecular bone.

Authors:  K A Wear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Relationships among calcaneal backscatter, attenuation, sound speed, hip bone mineral density, and age in normal adult women.

Authors:  K A Wear; D W Armstrong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Ultrasound of the skeleton: review of its clinical applications and pitfalls.

Authors:  R D Danese; A A Licata
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  The 2002 Canadian bone densitometry recommendations: take-home messages.

Authors:  Aliya A Khan; Jacques P Brown; David L Kendler; William D Leslie; Brian C Lentle; E Michael Lewiecki; Paul D Miller; R Lawrence Nicholson; Wojciech P Olszynski; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.