Literature DB >> 22770787

Types of combined oral contraceptives used by US women.

Kelli Stidham Hall1, James Trussell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to estimate the prevalence of types of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) used among US women. STUDY
DESIGN: We analyzed interview-collected data from 12,279 women aged 15-44 years participating in the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010. Analyses focused on COC use overall, by pill type, across sociodemographics and health factors.
RESULTS: The prevalence of current COC use (88 different brands) was 17%. The majority of COC users used earlier-formulation COCs: ≥30 mcg (67%) versus <30 mcg estrogen (33%), monophasic (67%) versus multiphasic (33%) dosages and traditional 21/7 (88%) versus extended/other cycle regimens (12%) regimens. Norgestimate (32%) and norethindrone (20%) were the most commonly used progestins. Sociodemographic, gynecological and health risk factors were associated with type of COC use.
CONCLUSION: Further investigation of specific COC use and of the factors associated with types of pills used among US women at the population level is needed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22770787      PMCID: PMC3469779          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  22 in total

1.  The 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth: sample design and analysis of a continuous survey.

Authors:  James M Lepkowski; William D Mosher; Karen E Davis; Robert M Groves; John Van Hoewyk
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2010-06

Review 2.  Tailoring combination oral contraceptives to the individual woman.

Authors:  David F Archer; Ignacio Lete Lasa
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  New regimens with combined oral contraceptive pills--moving away from traditional 21/7 cycles.

Authors:  Christine M Read
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Renee Mestad; Gina Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 5.  Current issues and available options in combined hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Johannes Bitzer; James A Simon
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 6.  Types of progestogens in combined oral contraception: effectiveness and side-effects.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; Frans M Helmerhorst; Nandita K Maitra; Regina Kulier; Kitty Bloemenkamp; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

Review 7.  The evolution of combined oral contraception: improving the risk-to-benefit ratio.

Authors:  Ronald Burkman; Carrie Bell; David Serfaty
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008.

Authors:  William D Mosher; Jo Jones
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2010-08

9.  The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: results of the MEGA case-control study.

Authors:  A van Hylckama Vlieg; F M Helmerhorst; J P Vandenbroucke; C J M Doggen; F R Rosendaal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-13

10.  Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: national follow-up study.

Authors:  Øjvind Lidegaard; Ellen Løkkegaard; Anne Louise Svendsen; Carsten Agger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-13
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Combined hormonal contraceptives: prescribing patterns, compliance, and benefits versus risks.

Authors:  Jan Brynhildsen
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-10

Review 2.  Hormonal contraception and pelvic floor function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rita Champaneria; Ruben Mamprin D'Andrea; Pallavi M Latthe
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Hormonal Contraceptives and Mood: Review of the Literature and Implications for Future Research.

Authors:  Thalia Robakis; Katherine E Williams; Lexi Nutkiewicz; Natalie L Rasgon
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Hormonal contraceptive use and risk of glioma among younger women: a nationwide case-control study.

Authors:  Lene Andersen; Søren Friis; Jesper Hallas; Pernille Ravn; Bjarne W Kristensen; David Gaist
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Resistance Training and Skeletal Muscle Protein Metabolism in Eumenorrheic Females: Implications for Researchers and Practitioners.

Authors:  Olivia E Knowles; Brad Aisbett; Luana C Main; Eric J Drinkwater; Liliana Orellana; Séverine Lamon
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Oral Contraceptives and Cigarette Smoking: A Review of the Literature and Future Directions.

Authors:  Alicia M Allen; Andrea H Weinberger; Reagan R Wetherill; Carol L Howe; Sherry A McKee
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Menstrual Irregularity, Hormonal Contraceptive Use, and Bone Stress Injuries in Collegiate Female Athletes in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer Cheng; Kristen A Santiago; Zafir Abutalib; Kate E Temme; Ann Hulme; Marci A Goolsby; Carrie L Esopenko; Ellen K Casey
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Recurrent venous thromboembolism and abnormal uterine bleeding with anticoagulant and hormone therapy use.

Authors:  Ida Martinelli; Anthonie W A Lensing; Saskia Middeldorp; Marcel Levi; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Bonno van Bellen; Henri Bounameaux; Timothy A Brighton; Alexander T Cohen; Mila Trajanovic; Martin Gebel; Phuong Lam; Philip S Wells; Martin H Prins
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  A comparison of self-reported oral contraceptive use and automated pharmacy data in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Leslie Spangler; Laura E Ichikawa; Rebecca A Hubbard; Belinda Operskalski; Andrea Z LaCroix; Susan M Ott; Delia Scholes
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Association of Risk for Venous Thromboembolism With Use of Low-Dose Extended- and Continuous-Cycle Combined Oral Contraceptives: A Safety Study Using the Sentinel Distributed Database.

Authors:  Jie Li; Genna Panucci; David Moeny; Wei Liu; Judith C Maro; Sengwee Toh; Ting-Ying Huang
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.