Literature DB >> 10435215

Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women.

W R Grady1, D H Klepinger, A Nelson-Wally.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Despite the fact that choosing a contraceptive method is often a decision made by couples, little is known about how men and women differ in their perceptions of the characteristics of various method types, and in the importance that they attach to those characteristics when choosing a contraceptive method.
METHODS: The data analyzed here are subsets from two companion surveys conducted in 1991--1,189 men aged 20-27 who were surveyed in the National Survey of Men and 740 women aged 20-27 who were surveyed in the National Survey of Women. Multivariate ordered logit analysis is used to examine how gender is related to both the importance that individuals assign to seven specific contraceptive characteristics when choosing a method, and to perceptions about the extent to which five common method types possess each of these characteristics.
RESULTS: Women rank pregnancy prevention as the single most important contraceptive characteristic when choosing a method, with 90% citing it as "very important." The health risks associated with particular methods and protection from sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are rated as the second most important characteristics by women (each mentioned as "very important" by 77%). In contrast, men consider STD prevention for themselves and their partner to be just as important as pregnancy protection (each mentioned as "very important" by 84-86%), and they rank STD prevention as more important than other health risks (by 72%). Women, but not men, rank both ease of use and the need to plan ahead as being more important characteristics than a method's interference with sexual pleasure. Both men and women have an accurate understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of particular methods, but differ enough in their perceptions to alter the relative attractiveness of each method. In particular, women have more favorable perceptions than men about the pill, being somewhat more likely than men to believe that the pill is "very good" at preventing pregnancy (75% vs. 67%) and to say that it is very good at not interfering with sexual pleasure (82% vs. 76%). In contrast, women have generally less favorable perceptions than men about other reversible methods, including the condom: Women were less likely than men to consider the condom very good at pregnancy prevention (29% vs. 46%) or at having no need for advance planning (22% vs. 38%). Gender differences in perceptions about the specific characteristics of contraceptive methods often vary by marital status.
CONCLUSIONS: Men and women have somewhat different priorities when choosing a contraceptive method. Despite many similarities between women and men in their perceptions about the characteristics of each method type, numerous differences between them may have an important influence on how couples make their method choices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Behavior; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Methods Chosen; Contraceptive Usage--determinants; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Family Planning; North America; Northern America; Perception; Population; Population Characteristics; Psychological Factors; Research Methodology; Research Report; Sampling Studies; Sex Factors; Studies; Surveys; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10435215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  29 in total

1.  Perceptions of hormonal contraceptive safety and side effects among low-income Latina and non-Latina women.

Authors:  S Guendelman; C Denny; J Mauldon; C Chetkovich
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-12

2.  The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Gina M Secura; Robert F Nease; Mary C Politi; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Renee Mestad; Gina Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Condom use and concurrent partnering among heterosexually active, African American men: a qualitative report.

Authors:  Victoria Frye; Kim Williams; Keosha T Bond; Kirk Henny; Malik Cupid; Linda Weiss; Debbie Lucy; Beryl A Koblin
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Acceptability of the Reality female condom and a latex prototype.

Authors:  M Latka; C Joanis; L Glover
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Communicating contraceptive effectiveness: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi; Mahnaz Shahnazi; Roghaieh Jahanbakhsh
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2012-05-26

7.  Assessment of a Microbicide Candidate among a Diverse Cohort of Urban Southern US Women and their Male Sexual Partners.

Authors:  Paula Frew; Kimberly Parker; Takeia Horton; Brooke Hixson; Lisa Flowers; Frances Priddy; Lisa Grohskopf; Christine Mauck; Kimberly Workowski
Journal:  J AIDS Clin Res       Date:  2012-07-03

8.  Pleasure, power, and inequality: incorporating sexuality into research on contraceptive use.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Jennifer S Hirsch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  The creeping Pearl: Why has the rate of contraceptive failure increased in clinical trials of combined hormonal contraceptive pills?

Authors:  James Trussell; David Portman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 10.  Understanding contraceptive failure.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 5.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.