Literature DB >> 22011937

Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay.

Mary-Anne Aarts1, Allan Okrainec, Amy Glicksman, Emily Pearsall, J Charles Victor, Robin S McLeod.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs is to incorporate strategies into the perioperative care plan to decrease complications, hasten recovery, and shorten hospital stay. This study was designed to determine which ERAS strategies contribute to overall shortened length of hospital stay in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in hospitals.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 336 consecutive patients at seven hospitals was performed. Demographic and data on 18 ERAS components identified from a systematic review of the literature were collected. A multiregression analysis was performed to assess for factors independently associated with a total length of hospital stay of 5 days or less.
RESULTS: Fifty-five percent were male (mean age, 62 years), 57.5% had an ASA III or IV, 76.9% had cancer, and 28.6% had low rectal procedures; 46.3% were completed laparoscopically. The median length of stay was 6.5 days with a mean of 8.6 days. On bivariate analysis, strategies associated with a stay ≤ 5 days were preoperative counseling, avoidance of oral bowel preparation, use of a laparoscopic approach, use of a transverse incision, introduction of clear fluids on day of surgery, and early discontinuation of the Foley catheter (all P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, factors that remained significantly associated with a stay ≤ 5 days included use of a laparoscopic approach (odds ratio (OR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-1.38), preoperative counseling (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.15-1.38), intraoperative fluid restriction (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.15-1.37), clear fluids on day of surgery (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.00-1.2), and Foley urinal catheter discontinued within 24 h of colon surgery and 72 h of rectal surgery (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.27).
CONCLUSIONS: In hospitals with variable uptake of ERAS strategies, preoperative counseling, intraoperative fluid restriction, use of a laparoscopic approach, immediate initiation of clear fluids after surgery, and early discontinuation of the Foley catheter are all independently associated with shortened length of stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22011937     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1897-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection.

Authors:  K C H Fearon; O Ljungqvist; M Von Meyenfeldt; A Revhaug; C H C Dejong; K Lassen; J Nygren; J Hausel; M Soop; J Andersen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 7.324

2.  A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection.

Authors:  J Maessen; C H C Dejong; J Hausel; J Nygren; K Lassen; J Andersen; A G H Kessels; A Revhaug; H Kehlet; O Ljungqvist; K C H Fearon; M F von Meyenfeldt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Use of chewing gum in reducing postoperative ileus after elective colorectal resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Miranda K Y Chan; Wai Lun Law
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Enhanced recovery programmes and colorectal surgery: does the laparoscope confer additional advantages?

Authors:  S Khan; M Gatt; J MacFie
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health.

Authors:  Alan E Hubbard; Jennifer Ahern; Nancy L Fleischer; Mark Van der Laan; Sheri A Lippman; Nicholas Jewell; Tim Bruckner; William A Satariano
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 6.  Impact of intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia and recovery from surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Grace C McCarthy; Sohair A Megalla; Ashraf S Habib
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Massarat Zutshi; Anthony J Senagore; Feza H Remzi; Jeffrey Hammel; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Fast-track in open intestinal surgery: prospective randomized study (Clinical Trials Gov Identifier no. NCT00123456).

Authors:  Zuzana Serclová; Petr Dytrych; Jaroslav Marvan; Katerina Nová; Zuzana Hankeová; Ondrej Ryska; Zuzana Slégrová; Lucie Buresová; Lucie Trávníková; Frantisek Antos
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 7.324

9.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Cagla Eskicioglu; Shawn S Forbes; Mary-Anne Aarts; Allan Okrainec; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care.

Authors:  A D G Anderson; C E McNaught; J MacFie; I Tring; P Barker; C J Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  51 in total

1.  Factors associated with failure of enhanced recovery programs after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Heung-Kwon Oh; Myong Hun Ihn; Il Tae Son; Jin Taek Park; Jaebong Lee; Duck-Woo Kim; Sung-Bum Kang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Zheng; Ahmedin Jemal; Chun Chieh Lin; Chung-Yuan Hu; George J Chang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Variation in care for surgical patients with colorectal cancer: protocol adherence in 12 European hospitals.

Authors:  Ruben van Zelm; Ellen Coeckelberghs; Walter Sermeus; Anthony De Buck van Overstraeten; Arved Weimann; Deborah Seys; Massimiliano Panella; Kris Vanhaecht
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Enhanced recovery strategies in colorectal surgery: is the compliance with the whole program required to achieve the target?

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Simone Beretta; Margherita Luperto; Davide Bernasconi; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Marco Braga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  David E Messenger; Nathan J Curtis; Adam Jones; Emma L Jones; Neil J Smart; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for open hepatectomy--physiology, immunomodulation, and implementation.

Authors:  Andrew J Page; Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Tiffany Zavadsky; Michael C Grant; Daniel J Galante; Elizabeth C Wick; Matthew Weiss; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wu; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Henner Schmidt; Sonia Kunz; Artur Bodnar; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  The perioperative surgical home (PSH): a comprehensive review of US and non-US studies shows predominantly positive quality and cost outcomes.

Authors:  Bita A Kash; Yichen Zhang; Kayla M Cline; Terri Menser; Thomas R Miller
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  Comprehensive enhanced recovery pathway significantly reduces postoperative length of stay and opioid usage in elective laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  Martin P Alvarez; Katherine E Foley; D Mark Zebley; Steven A Fassler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Does Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Colorectal Surgery Improve Patient Outcomes?

Authors:  Kristen A Ban; Julia R Berian; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.