Literature DB >> 19535182

Fast-track in open intestinal surgery: prospective randomized study (Clinical Trials Gov Identifier no. NCT00123456).

Zuzana Serclová1, Petr Dytrych, Jaroslav Marvan, Katerina Nová, Zuzana Hankeová, Ondrej Ryska, Zuzana Slégrová, Lucie Buresová, Lucie Trávníková, Frantisek Antos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown the value of using fast-track postoperative recovery. Standard procedures (non-fast-track strategies) remain in common use for perioperative care. Few prospective reports exist on the outcome of fast-tracking in Central Europe. The aim of our study was to assess the effect and safety of our own fast-track protocol with regard to the postoperative period after open bowel resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and five patients with ASA score I-II scheduled for open intestinal resection in the period April 2005-December 2007 were randomly selected for the fast-track group (FT) and non-fast-track group (non-FT). A designed protocol was used in the FT group with the emphasis on an interdisciplinary approach. The control group (non-FT) was treated by standard established procedures. Postoperative pain, rehabilitation, gastrointestinal functions, postoperative complications, and post-op length of stay were recorded.
RESULTS: Of 105 patients, 103 were statistically analyzed. Patients in the FT group (n=51) and non-FT group (n=52) did not differ in age, surgical diagnosis, or procedure. The fast-track procedure led to significantly better control of postoperative pain and faster restoration of GI functions (bowel movement after 1.3 days vs. 3.1, p<0.001). Food tolerance was significantly better in the FT group and rehabilitation was also faster. Hospital stay was shorter in the FT group - median seven days (95% CI 7.0-7.7) versus ten days (95% CI 9.5-11.3) in non-FT (p<0.001). Postoperative complications within 30 postoperative days were also significantly lower in the FT group (21.6 vs. 48.1%, p=0.003). There were no deaths and no patients were readmitted within 30 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Following the FT protocol helped to reduce frequency of postoperative complications and reduced hospital stay. We conclude that the FT strategy is safe and effective in improving postoperative outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19535182     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0261-5614            Impact factor:   7.324


  44 in total

Review 1.  Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay.

Authors:  Mary-Anne Aarts; Allan Okrainec; Amy Glicksman; Emily Pearsall; J Charles Victor; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  A Rawlinson; P Kang; J Evans; A Khanna
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  [Fast-track: evaluation of a new concept].

Authors:  W Schwenk
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Fast-track for the modern colorectal department.

Authors:  Rishabh Sehgal; Arnold Hill; Joseph Deasy; Deborah A McNamara; Ronan A Cahill
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Ambulatory Anorectal Surgery Reduced Postoperative Pain and Unplanned Returns to Care After Discharge.

Authors:  Aaron B Parrish; Sean M O'Neill; Steven R Crain; Tara A Russell; Deepak K Sonthalia; Vu T Nguyen; Armen Aboulian
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Safety, feasibility, and tolerance of early oral feeding after colorectal resection outside an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program.

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Luca Nespoli; Laura Torselli; Mariarita Panelli; Angelo Nespoli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Massimiliano Greco; Giovanni Capretti; Luigi Beretta; Marco Gemma; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marco Braga
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Enhancing surgical performance outcomes through process-driven care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Rajesh Aggarwal; Pritam Singh; Ara Darzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Enhanced recovery strategies in colorectal surgery: is the compliance with the whole program required to achieve the target?

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Simone Beretta; Margherita Luperto; Davide Bernasconi; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Marco Braga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Propensity Score Analysis of an Enhanced Recovery Programme in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  A Karran; J Wheat; D Chan; P Blake; R Barlow; W G Lewis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.