Literature DB >> 22010146

Robustness of quantitative compressive sensing MRI: the effect of random undersampling patterns on derived parameters for DCE- and DSC-MRI.

David S Smith1, Xia Li, James V Gambrell, Lori R Arlinghaus, C Chad Quarles, Thomas E Yankeelov, E Brian Welch.   

Abstract

Compressive sensing (CS) in Cartesian magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) involves random partial Fourier acquisitions. The random nature of these acquisitions can lead to variance in reconstruction errors. In quantitative MRI, variance in the reconstructed images translates to an uncertainty in the derived quantitative maps. We show that for a spatially regularized 2 ×-accelerated human breast CS DCE-MRI acquisition with a 192 (2) matrix size, the coefficients of variation (CoVs) in voxel-level parameters due to the random acquisition are 1.1%, 0.96%, and 1.5% for the tissue parameters K(trans), v(e), and v(p), with an average error in the mean of -2.5%, -2.0%, and -3.7%, respectively. Only 5% of the acquisition schemes had a systematic underestimation larger than than 4.2%, 3.7%, and 6.1%, respectively. For a 2 × -accelerated rat brain CS DSC-MRI study with a 64(2) matrix size, the CoVs due to the random acquisition were 19%, 9.5%, and 15% for the cerebral blood flow and blood volume and mean transit time, respectively, and the average errors in the tumor mean were 9.2%, 0.49%, and -7.0%, respectively. Across 11 000 different CS reconstructions, we saw no outliers in the distribution of parameters, suggesting that, despite the random undersampling schemes, CS accelerated quantitative MRI may have a predictable level of performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22010146      PMCID: PMC3289060          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2172216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  26 in total

1.  Test-retest reliability of DSC MRI CBV mapping in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M E Henry; M J Kaufman; N Lange; M E Schmidt; S Purcell; J Cote; D M Perron-Henry; E Stoddard; B M Cohen; P F Renshaw
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Lustig; David Donoho; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Contrast agents and cerebral hemodynamics.

Authors:  B R Rosen; J W Belliveau; B R Buchbinder; R C McKinstry; L M Porkka; D N Kennedy; M S Neuder; C R Fisel; H J Aronen; K K Kwong
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues.

Authors:  S S KETY
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1951-03       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; R M Weisskoff; D A Chesler; C Gyldensted; B R Rosen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Reconstruction of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast with temporal constraints.

Authors:  Liyong Chen; Matthias C Schabel; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Susan M Galbraith; Martin A Lodge; N Jane Taylor; Gordon J S Rustin; Søren Bentzen; J James Stirling; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Phase I study of intravenous vascular endothelial growth factor trap, aflibercept, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  A Craig Lockhart; Mace L Rothenberg; Jakob Dupont; Wendy Cooper; Paul Chevalier; Lars Sternas; Giliane Buzenet; Elizabeth Koehler; Jeffrey A Sosman; Lawrence H Schwartz; David H Gultekin; Jason A Koutcher; Edwin F Donnelly; Ric Andal; Isabelle Dancy; David R Spriggs; William P Tew
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter L Choyke; Andrew J Dwyer; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  8 in total

1.  Accelerating volumetric cine MRI (VC-MRI) using undersampling for real-time 3D target localization/tracking in radiation therapy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Wendy Harris; Fang-Fang Yin; Chunhao Wang; You Zhang; Jing Cai; Lei Ren
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Accelerated Brain DCE-MRI Using Iterative Reconstruction With Total Generalized Variation Penalty for Quantitative Pharmacokinetic Analysis: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Chunhao Wang; Fang-Fang Yin; John P Kirkpatrick; Zheng Chang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-05-23

3.  Assessment of Treatment Response With Diffusion-Weighted MRI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Treated With Single-Dose Preoperative Radiotherapy: Initial Results.

Authors:  Chunhao Wang; Janet K Horton; Fang-Fang Yin; Zheng Chang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-07-01

4.  3D Cartesian MRI with compressed sensing and variable view sharing using complementary poisson-disc sampling.

Authors:  Evan Levine; Bruce Daniel; Shreyas Vasanawala; Brian Hargreaves; Manojkumar Saranathan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Fast group matching for MR fingerprinting reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen F Cauley; Kawin Setsompop; Dan Ma; Yun Jiang; Huihui Ye; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Mark A Griswold; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Quantitative Evaluation of Temporal Regularizers in Compressed Sensing Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Lori R Arlinghaus; Thomas E Yankeelov; Xiaoping Yang; David S Smith
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2017-08-28

7.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting.

Authors:  Dan Ma; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich; Kecheng Liu; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Jeffrey L Duerk; Mark A Griswold
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Potential of compressed sensing in quantitative MR imaging of cancer.

Authors:  David S Smith; Xia Li; Richard G Abramson; C Chad Quarles; Thomas E Yankeelov; E Brian Welch
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.909

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.