Literature DB >> 25154928

[Patellofemoral arthroplasty: indication, technique and results].

M Cotic1, A B Imhoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although patellofemoral arthroplasty has been used for more than 30 years, it is still a challenging subject in orthopedics. The reason for this are the complex kinematics of the patellofemoral joint which are influenced by dynamic and static factors. New implant concepts that incorporate multiple coronal and sagittal curvatures and surface controlled inlay implantation show a positive direction in modern patellofemoral arthroplasty.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this work is the review of the literature on patellofemoral arthroplasty and the presentation of our own experience.
METHODS: We present indications and surgical techniques of patellofemoral arthroplasty as well as the most important aspects of preoperative evaluation. The patellofemoral joint can be reconstructed using either an inlay or an onlay prosthesis. Both arthroplasty concepts are discussed. Additional pathologies like chronic patellofemoral instabilities due to dysplasia, valgus/varus or rotational malalignment, and soft-tissue alterations are addressed with concomitant procedures.
RESULTS: Both inlay and onlay arthroplasty have demonstrated good functional outcome scores in patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Patients with patellofemoral instability and/or trochlear dysplasia may benefit more from patellofemoral arthroplasty than patients with primary osteoarthritis because not only pain but also secondary pathologies are addressed.
CONCLUSION: Patellofemoral arthroplasty is an effective and safe procedure if the indication criteria are respected and the specific surgical technique is used. However, comparative results on current inlay and onlay prostheses have not been published in the literature to date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25154928     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-014-3006-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  37 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Periosteal autologous chondrocyte implantation for patellar chondral defect in patients with normal and abnormal patellar tracking.

Authors:  I J P Henderson; P Lavigne
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Patellofemoral kinematics after limited resurfacing of the trochlea.

Authors:  Matthew Provencher; Neil S Ghodadra; Nikhil N Verma; Brian J Cole; Stephanie Zaire; Elizabeth Shewman; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data.

Authors:  D Gould; D Kelly; L Goldstone; J Gammon
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  T E McAlindon; S Snow; C Cooper; P A Dieppe
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Prospective clinical and radiological two-year results after patellofemoral arthroplasty using an implant with an asymmetric trochlea design.

Authors:  Knut Beitzel; Philip B Schöttle; Matthias Cotic; Vyas Dharmesh; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The abnormal lateral patellofemoral angle: a diagnostic roentgenographic sign of recurrent patellar subluxation.

Authors:  C A Laurin; H P Lévesque; R Dussault; H Labelle; J P Peides
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the impact of design on outcomes.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  [Patella infera. Apropos of 128 cases].

Authors:  J Caton; G Deschamps; P Chambat; J L Lerat; H Dejour
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1982
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Patellofemoral inlay implants-an innovation in patellofemoral joint arthroplasty?]

Authors:  Hannes Degenhardt; Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Patellofemoral arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Cotic; P Forkel; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Treatment of Unicompartmental Cartilage Defects of the Knee with Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Patellofemoral Partial Knee Arthroplasty or Focal Resurfacing.

Authors:  Bernhard Springer; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27

4.  The clinical outcome of the different HemiCAP and UniCAP knee implants: A systematic and comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Dimitrios Chytas; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2018-06-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.