Literature DB >> 22008035

Kinetic analysis of the unique error signature of human DNA polymerase ν.

Mercedes E Arana1, Olga Potapova, Thomas A Kunkel, Catherine M Joyce.   

Abstract

The fidelity of DNA synthesis by A-family DNA polymerases ranges from very accurate for bacterial, bacteriophage, and mitochondrial family members to very low for certain eukaryotic homologues. The latter include DNA polymerase ν (Pol ν) which, among all A-family polymerases, is uniquely prone to misincorporating dTTP opposite template G in a highly sequence-dependent manner. Here we present a kinetic analysis of this unusual error specificity, in four different sequence contexts and in comparison to Pol ν's more accurate A-family homologue, the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. The kinetic data strongly correlate with rates of stable misincorporation during gap-filling DNA synthesis. The lower fidelity of Pol ν compared to that of Klenow fragment can be attributed primarily to a much lower catalytic efficiency for correct dNTP incorporation, whereas both enzymes have similar kinetic parameters for G-dTTP misinsertion. The major contributor to sequence-dependent differences in Pol ν error rates is the reaction rate, k(pol). In the sequence context where fidelity is highest, k(pol) for correct G-dCTP incorporation by Pol ν is ~15-fold faster than k(pol) for G-dTTP misinsertion. However, in sequence contexts where the error rate is higher, k(pol) is the same for both correct and mismatched dNTPs, implying that the transition state does not provide additional discrimination against misinsertion. The results suggest that Pol ν may be fine-tuned to function when high enzyme activity is not a priority and may even be disadvantageous and that the relaxed active-site specificity toward the G-dTTP mispair may be associated with its cellular function(s).
© 2011 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22008035      PMCID: PMC3235957          DOI: 10.1021/bi201197p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  54 in total

1.  DNA polymerases lose their grip.

Authors:  W A Beard; S H Wilson
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-11

2.  Exonuclease proofreading by human mitochondrial DNA polymerase.

Authors:  A A Johnson; K A Johnson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-07-26       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The fidelity of human DNA polymerase gamma with and without exonucleolytic proofreading and the p55 accessory subunit.

Authors:  M J Longley; D Nguyen; T A Kunkel; W C Copeland
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Emerging links between hypermutation of antibody genes and DNA polymerases.

Authors:  P J Gearhart; R D Wood
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 53.106

5.  Somatic mutation hotspots correlate with DNA polymerase eta error spectrum.

Authors:  I B Rogozin; Y I Pavlov; K Bebenek; T Matsuda; T A Kunkel
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 25.606

6.  Crystal structures of open and closed forms of binary and ternary complexes of the large fragment of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I: structural basis for nucleotide incorporation.

Authors:  Y Li; S Korolev; G Waksman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Error rate and specificity of human and murine DNA polymerase eta.

Authors:  T Matsuda; K Bebenek; C Masutani; I B Rogozin; F Hanaoka; T A Kunkel
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  5'-Deoxyribose phosphate lyase activity of human DNA polymerase iota in vitro.

Authors:  K Bebenek; A Tissier; E G Frank; J P McDonald; R Prasad; S H Wilson; R Woodgate; T A Kunkel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Distinct roles of the active-site Mg2+ ligands, Asp882 and Asp705, of DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) during the prechemistry conformational transitions.

Authors:  Oya Bermek; Nigel D F Grindley; Catherine M Joyce
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Discrimination against purine-pyrimidine mispairs in the polymerase active site of DNA polymerase I: a structural explanation.

Authors:  Dana T Minnick; Lixing Liu; Nigel D F Grindley; Thomas A Kunkel; Catherine M Joyce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

1.  Structures of human DNA polymerases ν and θ expose their end game.

Authors:  William A Beard; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 2.  Translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Julian E Sale
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  DNA Polymerase ν Rapidly Bypasses O6-Methyl-dG but Not O6-[4-(3-Pyridyl)-4-oxobutyl-dG and O2-Alkyl-dTs.

Authors:  A S Prakasha Gowda; Thomas E Spratt
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Human DNA Polymerase ν Catalyzes Correct and Incorrect DNA Synthesis with High Catalytic Efficiency.

Authors:  A S Prakasha Gowda; George-Lucian Moldovan; Thomas E Spratt
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Structure and function relationships in mammalian DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Nicole M Hoitsma; Amy M Whitaker; Matthew A Schaich; Mallory R Smith; Max S Fairlamb; Bret D Freudenthal
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Contrasting mutation rates from specific-locus and long-term mutation-accumulation procedures.

Authors:  John W Drake
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  How a homolog of high-fidelity replicases conducts mutagenic DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Young-Sam Lee; Yang Gao; Wei Yang
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 15.369

8.  Conserved overlapping gene arrangement, restricted expression, and biochemical activities of DNA polymerase ν (POLN).

Authors:  Kei-Ichi Takata; Junya Tomida; Shelley Reh; Lisa M Swanhart; Minoru Takata; Neil A Hukriede; Richard D Wood
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 5.157

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.