Literature DB >> 11554790

Error rate and specificity of human and murine DNA polymerase eta.

T Matsuda1, K Bebenek, C Masutani, I B Rogozin, F Hanaoka, T A Kunkel.   

Abstract

We describe here the error specificity of mammalian DNA polymerase eta (pol eta), an enzyme that performs translesion DNA synthesis and may participate in somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes. Both mouse and human pol eta lack intrinsic proofreading exonuclease activity and both copy undamaged DNA inaccurately. Analysis of more than 1500 single-base substitutions by human pol eta indicates that error rates for all 12 mismatches are high and variable depending on the composition and symmetry of the mismatch and its location. pol eta also generates tandem base substitutions at an unprecedented rate, and kinetic analysis indicates that it extends a tandem double mismatch about as efficiently as other replicative enzymes extend single-base mismatches. This ability to use an aberrant primer terminus and the high rate of single and double-base substitutions support the idea that pol eta may forego strict shape complementarity in order to facilitate highly efficient lesion bypass. Relaxed discrimination is further indicated by pol eta infidelity for a wide variety of nucleotide deletion and addition errors. The nature and location of these errors suggest that some may be initiated by strand slippage, while others result from additional mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11554790     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  76 in total

Review 1.  Somatic immunoglobulin hypermutation.

Authors:  Marilyn Diaz; Paolo Casali
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.486

2.  Error-prone DNA repair activity during somatic hypermutation in shark B lymphocytes.

Authors:  Catherine Zhu; Ellen Hsu
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Correlation of somatic hypermutation specificity and A-T base pair substitution errors by DNA polymerase eta during copying of a mouse immunoglobulin kappa light chain transgene.

Authors:  Youri I Pavlov; Igor B Rogozin; Alexey P Galkin; Anna Y Aksenova; Fumio Hanaoka; Christina Rada; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis.

Authors:  Mihoko Kai; Teresa S-F Wang
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  Does DNA repair occur during somatic hypermutation?

Authors:  Huseyin Saribasak; Patricia J Gearhart
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 11.130

6.  Kinetic analysis of the unique error signature of human DNA polymerase ν.

Authors:  Mercedes E Arana; Olga Potapova; Thomas A Kunkel; Catherine M Joyce
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  A unique error signature for human DNA polymerase nu.

Authors:  Mercedes E Arana; Kei-ichi Takata; Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Richard D Wood; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-11-21

8.  Regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase eta transcript and protein.

Authors:  Ritu Pabla; Donald Rozario; Wolfram Siede
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 9.  Half-Intercalation Stabilizes Slipped Mispairing and Explains Genome Vulnerability to Frameshift Mutagenesis by Endogenous "Molecular Bookmarks".

Authors:  Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  Biochemical analysis of active site mutations of human polymerase η.

Authors:  Samuel C Suarez; Renee A Beardslee; Shannon M Toffton; Scott D McCulloch
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.433

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.