| Literature DB >> 22007154 |
Huilu Wu1, Jingkun Yuan, Ying Bai, Fan Kou, Fei Jia, Bin Liu.
Abstract
A novel complex of cadmium (II) picrate (Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22007154 PMCID: PMC3189465 DOI: 10.1155/2011/705989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Crystallographic data and data collection parameters for [Cd(babb)2](pic)2.
| Complex | [Cd(babb)2](pic)2 |
|---|---|
| Molecular formula | C70H62CdN16O14 |
| Molecular weight | 1463.76 |
| Crystal system | Triclinic |
| Space group | P-1 |
| a (Å) | 13.903 (4) |
| b (Å) | 14.146 (4) |
| c (Å) | 19.330 (5) |
|
| 90.595 (3) |
|
| 110.890 (3) |
|
| 106.325 (3) |
|
| 3382.5 (16) |
| Z | 2 |
|
| 1.437 |
|
| 1508 |
| Crystal size (mm) | 0.40 × 0.38 × 0.30 |
|
| 2.25 to 25.00 |
|
| −16, 16/−15, 16/ −22, 22 |
| Reflections collected | 20103 |
| Independent reflections | 11730 [ |
| Completeness to theta = 25.00 | 98.4% |
| Refinement method | Full-matrix least- |
| Data/restraints/parameters | 11730/49/910 |
| Goodness-of-fit on | 1.008 |
| Final | 0.0473, 0.1117 |
|
| 0.0682, 0.1249 |
| Largest differences peak and hole (e Å−3) | 0.986 and −0.537 |
Selected atomic distances (Å) and bond angles (°) for the complex.
| Bond distances | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cd(1)–N(15) | 2.248 (3) | Cd(1)–N(13) | 2.319 (3) |
| Cd(1)–N(11) | 2.281 (3) | Cd(1)–N(7) | 2.556 (3) |
| Cd(1)–N(9) | 2.307 (3) | Cd(1)–N(12) | 2.673 (3) |
|
| |||
| Bond angles | |||
|
| |||
| N(15)–Cd(1)–N(11) | 109.41 (11) | N(9)–Cd(1)–N(7) | 70.12 (10) |
| N(15)–Cd(1)–N(9) | 96.74 (11) | N(13)–Cd(1)–N(7) | 92.25 (11) |
| N(11)–Cd(1)–N(9) | 106.65 (11) | N(15)–Cd(1)–N(12) | 70.80 (11) |
| N(15)–Cd(1)–N(13) | 100.72 (12) | N(11)–Cd(1)–N(12) | 165.10 (10) |
| N(11)–Cd(1)–N(13) | 98.24 (11) | N(9)–Cd(1)–N(12) | 87.96 (10) |
| N(9)–Cd(1)–N(13) | 142.69 (11) | N(13)–Cd(1)–N(12) | 67.50 (10) |
| N(15)–Cd(1)–N(7) | 166.37 (10) | N(7)–Cd(1)–N(12) | 111.11 (9) |
| N(11)–Cd(1)–N(7) | 72.40 (10) | ||
Figure 1Molecular structure and atom-numberings of [Cd(babb)2]2+ with hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity.
Figure 2Absorption spectra of the ligand babb (a), Cd (II) complex (c) (3 × 10−5 mol L−1) in the absence and presence of increasing amounts of DNA (0–15 × 10−5 mol L−1) in 5 mmol L−1 Tris-HCl/50 mmol L−1 NaCl buffer (pH = 7.2). The arrow shows absorbance changes on increasing DNA concentration. Plot of [DNA]/(ε − ε ) versus [DNA] for absorption titration of DNA with the ligand babb (b), Cd (II) complex (d).
Figure 3Emission spectra of EB bound to CT-DNA in the presence of the ligand babb (a), Cd (II) complex (c), [Complex] = 3 × 10−5 M; λ ex = 520 nm. The arrows show the intensity changes upon increasing concentrations of the complex. Fluorescence quenching curves of EB bound to CT-DNA by the ligand babb (b), Cd (II) complex (d). (Plots of I 0/I versus [Complex].)
Figure 4Effect of increasing amounts of the ligand babb (a), Cd (II) complex (b) on the relative viscosity of CT-DNA at 25 (±0.1)°C in 5 mmol L−1 Tris-HCl buffer (pH = 7.2, [DNA] = 5 × 10−5 M).