Literature DB >> 21997335

Doubling times and CT screen–detected lung cancers in the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study.

David O Wilson1, Adam Ryan, Carl Fuhrman, Matthew Schuchert, Steven Shapiro, Jill M Siegfried, Joel Weissfeld.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: As computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer becomes more widespread, volumetric analyses, including doubling times, of CT-screen detected lung nodules and lung cancers may provide useful information in the follow-up and management of CT-detected lung nodules and cancers.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze doubling times in CT screen detected lung cancers and compare prevalent and nonprevalent cancers and different cell types on non small cell lung cancer.
METHODS: We performed volumetric and doubling time analysis on 63 non–small cell lung cancers detected as part of the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study using a commercially available VITREA 2 workstation and VITREA VITAL nodule segmentation software.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Doubling times (DT) were divided into three groups: rapid (DT<183 d), typical (DT 183–365 d), and slow (DT>365 d). Adenocarcinoma/bronchioloalveolar carcinoma comprised 86.7% of the slow DT group compared with 20% of the rapid DT group. Conversely, squamous cell cancer comprised 60% of the rapid DT group compared with 3.3% of the slow DT group. Twenty-eight of 42 (67%) prevalent and 2 of 21 (10%) nonprevalent cancers were in the slow DT group (P<0.0001; Fisher's exact test). Twenty-four of 32 (75%) prevalent and 1 of 11 (9%) nonprevalent adenocarcinomas were in the slow DT group (P<0.0002; Fisher's exact test).
CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric analysis of CT-detected lung cancers is particularly useful in AC/BAC. Prevalent cancers have a significantly slower DT than nonprevalent cancers and a higher percentage of adenocarcinoma/bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. These results should affect the management of indeterminant lung nodules detected on screening CT scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21997335      PMCID: PMC3262038          DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201107-1223OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  15 in total

1.  Evolution of peripheral lung adenocarcinomas: CT findings correlated with histology and tumor doubling time.

Authors:  T Aoki; H Nakata; H Watanabe; K Nakamura; T Kasai; H Hashimoto; K Yasumoto; M Kido
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology.

Authors:  Myria Petrou; Leslie E Quint; Bin Nan; Laurence H Baker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Software volumetric evaluation of doubling times for differentiating benign versus malignant pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Revel; Aurelie Merlin; Severine Peyrard; Rached Triki; Sophie Couchon; Gilles Chatellier; Guy Frija
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Five-year lung cancer screening experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histologic features of 61 lung cancers.

Authors:  Rebecca M Lindell; Thomas E Hartman; Stephen J Swensen; James R Jett; David E Midthun; Henry D Tazelaar; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Does 2-year stability imply that pulmonary nodules are benign?

Authors:  D F Yankelevitz; C I Henschke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening.

Authors:  M Hasegawa; S Sone; S Takashima; F Li; Z G Yang; Y Maruyama; T Watanabe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Volumetric growth rate of stage I lung cancer prior to treatment: serial CT scanning.

Authors:  Helen T Winer-Muram; S Gregory Jennings; Robert D Tarver; Alex M Aisen; Mark Tann; Dewey J Conces; Cristopher A Meyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Distribution of stage I lung cancer growth rates determined with serial volumetric CT measurements.

Authors:  S Gregory Jennings; Helen T Winer-Muram; Mark Tann; Jun Ying; Ian Dowdeswell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Validation of a model of lung cancer risk prediction among smokers.

Authors:  Kathleen A Cronin; Mitchell H Gail; Zhaohui Zou; Peter B Bach; Jarmo Virtamo; Demetrius Albanes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  31 in total

1.  Return of the pulmonary nodule: the radiologist's key role in implementing the 2015 BTS guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Richard N J Graham; David R Baldwin; Matthew E J Callister; Fergus V Gleeson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Update in lung cancer and mesothelioma 2012.

Authors:  Charles A Powell; Balazs Halmos; Serge P Nana-Sinkam
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Computer-aided diagnosis systems for lung cancer: challenges and methodologies.

Authors:  Ayman El-Baz; Garth M Beache; Georgy Gimel'farb; Kenji Suzuki; Kazunori Okada; Ahmed Elnakib; Ahmed Soliman; Behnoush Abdollahi
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-01-29

4.  Optimisation of volume-doubling time cutoff for fast-growing lung nodules in CT lung cancer screening reduces false-positive referrals.

Authors:  Marjolein A Heuvelmans; Matthijs Oudkerk; Geertruida H de Bock; Harry J de Koning; Xueqian Xie; Peter M A van Ooijen; Marcel J W Greuter; Pim A de Jong; Harry J M Groen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Accuracy of lung nodule volumetry in low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction: an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom study.

Authors:  K W Doo; E-Y Kang; H S Yong; O H Woo; K Y Lee; Y-W Oh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Computerized segmentation of pulmonary nodules depicted in CT examinations using freehand sketches.

Authors:  Yongqian Qiang; Qiuping Wang; Guiping Xu; Hongxia Ma; Lei Deng; Lei Zhang; Jiantao Pu; Youmin Guo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Indolent, Potentially Inconsequential Lung Cancers in the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study.

Authors:  Prashanth M Thalanayar; Nejat Altintas; Joel L Weissfeld; Carl R Fuhrman; David O Wilson
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-08

Review 8.  Radiomics of pulmonary nodules and lung cancer.

Authors:  Ryan Wilson; Anand Devaraj
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-02

9.  Comparison of ABC/2 estimation and a volumetric computerized method for measurement of meningiomas using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Charles F Opalak; Matthew Parry; Andrew K Rock; Adam P Sima; Matthew T Carr; Vyshak Chandra; Kathryn G Workman; Aravind Somasundaram; William C Broaddus
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Genomic Underpinnings of Tumor Behavior in In Situ and Early Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Qian; Shilin Zhao; Yong Zou; S M Jamshedur Rahman; Maria-Fernanda Senosain; Thomas Stricker; Heidi Chen; Charles A Powell; Alain C Borczuk; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 21.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.