PURPOSE: To determine the range of growth rates of stage I lung cancers prior to treatment by using volumetric measurement at serial chest computed tomographic (CT) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 50 patients who underwent two CT examinations at 25-day or greater intervals. Tumor craniocaudal length and cross-sectional diameters and perimeters were used to volumetrically model each tumor in three ways (spherical, elliptical, perimeter). Volumes were compared by determining Pearson correlation coefficients. By using these volumes, tumor doubling time was determined for each patient. RESULTS: Volumes measured with all three methods were highly correlated. With the perimeter method, median doubling time was 181 days, with a very wide range. Eleven (22%) of 50 tumors had doubling times of 465 days or more. There was considerable overlap in doubling time between histologic subtypes. Assuming constant growth, only three (6%) of the 50 tumors would have been the size of a stage IA tumor for less than 1 year. CONCLUSION: Comparison of tumor volumes at serial CT examinations reveals a very wide range of growth rates. Some tumors grow so slowly that biopsy is required to prove they are malignant.
PURPOSE: To determine the range of growth rates of stage I lung cancers prior to treatment by using volumetric measurement at serial chest computed tomographic (CT) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 50 patients who underwent two CT examinations at 25-day or greater intervals. Tumor craniocaudal length and cross-sectional diameters and perimeters were used to volumetrically model each tumor in three ways (spherical, elliptical, perimeter). Volumes were compared by determining Pearson correlation coefficients. By using these volumes, tumor doubling time was determined for each patient. RESULTS: Volumes measured with all three methods were highly correlated. With the perimeter method, median doubling time was 181 days, with a very wide range. Eleven (22%) of 50 tumors had doubling times of 465 days or more. There was considerable overlap in doubling time between histologic subtypes. Assuming constant growth, only three (6%) of the 50 tumors would have been the size of a stage IA tumor for less than 1 year. CONCLUSION: Comparison of tumor volumes at serial CT examinations reveals a very wide range of growth rates. Some tumors grow so slowly that biopsy is required to prove they are malignant.
Authors: Dag Wormanns; Gerhard Kohl; Ernst Klotz; Anke Marheine; Florian Beyer; Walter Heindel; Stefan Diederich Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-11-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael M Slattery; Claire Foley; Dermot Kenny; Richard W Costello; P Mark Logan; Michael J Lee Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Daniel Forsberg; Amit Gupta; Christopher Mills; Brett MacAdam; Beverly Rosipko; Barbara A Bangert; Michael D Coffey; Christos Kosmas; Jeffrey L Sunshine Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-11-26 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Marjolein A Heuvelmans; Matthijs Oudkerk; Geertruida H de Bock; Harry J de Koning; Xueqian Xie; Peter M A van Ooijen; Marcel J W Greuter; Pim A de Jong; Harry J M Groen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jingbo Wang; Pawinee Mahasittiwat; Ka Kit Wong; Leslie E Quint; Feng-Ming Spring Kong Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2012-07-28 Impact factor: 5.705